肉毒杆菌毒素对网球肘的疗效:随机临床试验荟萃分析。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1007/s00264-024-06339-6
Eduardo Silva Reis Barreto, César Romero Antunes Júnior, Vinícius Borges Alencar, Márcio Passos Leandro, Luiz Marcelo Bastos Leite, Liliane Elze Falcão Lins-Kusterer, Durval Campos Kraychete
{"title":"肉毒杆菌毒素对网球肘的疗效:随机临床试验荟萃分析。","authors":"Eduardo Silva Reis Barreto, César Romero Antunes Júnior, Vinícius Borges Alencar, Márcio Passos Leandro, Luiz Marcelo Bastos Leite, Liliane Elze Falcão Lins-Kusterer, Durval Campos Kraychete","doi":"10.1007/s00264-024-06339-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to assess the efficacy of botulinum toxin type A (BT-A) in treating tennis elbow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed the literature and included full-text randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published until June 2024, available in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Eligible studies involved patients with tennis elbow and compared BT-A with placebo or other injectable treatments. Primary outcomes included pain relief, while secondary outcomes assessed quality of life, adverse effects, and grip strength. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs with a total of 381 patients were included. The participants were predominantly middle-aged (mean age 46.64 ± 7.72 years) and diagnosed with chronic tennis elbow. BT-A doses ranged from 20U to 60U. Compared to placebo, BT-A effectively reduced pain at two to four weeks (MD = -1.37; 95% CI = -2.18 to -0.57) and at eight to 12 weeks (MD = -1.13; 95% CI = -1.62 to -0.65). Grip strength was comparable between the BT-A and placebo groups at both time points (2 to 4 weeks: SMD = -0.86; 95% CI -1.78 to 0.05; 8 to 12 weeks: SMD = 0.00; 95% CI = -0.95 to 0.95).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests that BT-A reduces pain in tennis elbow within two to 12 weeks compared to placebo. Findings are limited by study size, and further research is needed to confirm its efficacy and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of Botulinum Toxin in Tennis Elbow: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Silva Reis Barreto, César Romero Antunes Júnior, Vinícius Borges Alencar, Márcio Passos Leandro, Luiz Marcelo Bastos Leite, Liliane Elze Falcão Lins-Kusterer, Durval Campos Kraychete\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00264-024-06339-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to assess the efficacy of botulinum toxin type A (BT-A) in treating tennis elbow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed the literature and included full-text randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published until June 2024, available in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Eligible studies involved patients with tennis elbow and compared BT-A with placebo or other injectable treatments. Primary outcomes included pain relief, while secondary outcomes assessed quality of life, adverse effects, and grip strength. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs with a total of 381 patients were included. The participants were predominantly middle-aged (mean age 46.64 ± 7.72 years) and diagnosed with chronic tennis elbow. BT-A doses ranged from 20U to 60U. Compared to placebo, BT-A effectively reduced pain at two to four weeks (MD = -1.37; 95% CI = -2.18 to -0.57) and at eight to 12 weeks (MD = -1.13; 95% CI = -1.62 to -0.65). Grip strength was comparable between the BT-A and placebo groups at both time points (2 to 4 weeks: SMD = -0.86; 95% CI -1.78 to 0.05; 8 to 12 weeks: SMD = 0.00; 95% CI = -0.95 to 0.95).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests that BT-A reduces pain in tennis elbow within two to 12 weeks compared to placebo. Findings are limited by study size, and further research is needed to confirm its efficacy and safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06339-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06339-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估 A 型肉毒毒素(BT-A)治疗网球肘的疗效:我们系统地查阅了相关文献,并纳入了截至 2024 年 6 月发表在 PubMed、Scopus、Embase 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 数据库中的全文随机临床试验(RCT)。符合条件的研究涉及网球肘患者,并对 BT-A 与安慰剂或其他注射疗法进行了比较。主要结果包括疼痛缓解,次要结果包括生活质量、不良反应和握力。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具对偏倚风险进行了评估:结果:共纳入了七项 RCT,共有 381 名患者。参与者主要为中年人(平均年龄为 46.64 ± 7.72 岁),被诊断为慢性网球肘。BT-A 剂量从 20U 到 60U 不等。与安慰剂相比,BT-A能有效减轻2至4周的疼痛(MD = -1.37; 95% CI = -2.18 to -0.57)和8至12周的疼痛(MD = -1.13; 95% CI = -1.62 to -0.65)。在两个时间点,BT-A 组和安慰剂组的握力相当(2 至 4 周:SMD = -0.86;95% CI -1.78 至 0.05;8 至 12 周:结论:这项荟萃分析表明,与安慰剂相比,BT-A 可在 2 至 12 周内减轻网球肘患者的疼痛。研究结果受研究规模的限制,还需要进一步的研究来确认其疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The efficacy of Botulinum Toxin in Tennis Elbow: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Purpose: This study aims to assess the efficacy of botulinum toxin type A (BT-A) in treating tennis elbow.

Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature and included full-text randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published until June 2024, available in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Eligible studies involved patients with tennis elbow and compared BT-A with placebo or other injectable treatments. Primary outcomes included pain relief, while secondary outcomes assessed quality of life, adverse effects, and grip strength. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.

Results: Seven RCTs with a total of 381 patients were included. The participants were predominantly middle-aged (mean age 46.64 ± 7.72 years) and diagnosed with chronic tennis elbow. BT-A doses ranged from 20U to 60U. Compared to placebo, BT-A effectively reduced pain at two to four weeks (MD = -1.37; 95% CI = -2.18 to -0.57) and at eight to 12 weeks (MD = -1.13; 95% CI = -1.62 to -0.65). Grip strength was comparable between the BT-A and placebo groups at both time points (2 to 4 weeks: SMD = -0.86; 95% CI -1.78 to 0.05; 8 to 12 weeks: SMD = 0.00; 95% CI = -0.95 to 0.95).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that BT-A reduces pain in tennis elbow within two to 12 weeks compared to placebo. Findings are limited by study size, and further research is needed to confirm its efficacy and safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信