达巴万星作为感染性心内膜炎序贯疗法疗效的系统回顾。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Gabriele Maria Leanza, Emanuele Rando, Federico Frondizi, Eleonora Taddei, Francesca Giovannenze, Juan P Horcajada, Giancarlo Scoppettuolo, Carlo Torti
{"title":"达巴万星作为感染性心内膜炎序贯疗法疗效的系统回顾。","authors":"Gabriele Maria Leanza, Emanuele Rando, Federico Frondizi, Eleonora Taddei, Francesca Giovannenze, Juan P Horcajada, Giancarlo Scoppettuolo, Carlo Torti","doi":"10.1007/s15010-024-02393-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dalbavancin is an antibiotic characterized by an extended half-life and efficacy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococci. Currently, there are only narrative reviews summarizing the evidence about the use of dalbavancin for infective endocarditis (IE), many of which are focused primarily on its use as consolidation therapy. For this reason, we conducted a systematic review to describe the clinical efficacy and the safety of dalbavancin in IE treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for available evidence using the MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science libraries, with no restrictions regarding the publication year. The risk of bias was performed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool for the comparative studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for descriptive studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies were included. All of them were observational. Native valve endocarditis was the most common kind of IE found in the studies' populations (128/263, 48.7%), followed by prosthetic valve endocarditis, and cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related endocarditis. Coagulase-negative Staphylococci were the most common pathogens isolated (83/269, 30.1%), followed by S. aureus, Enterococci spp and Streptococci spp. Five out of nine studies documented a clinical failure rate of less than 10%. Dalbavancin showed a favourable safety profile. Dalbavancin appears to be a promising option for the consolidation therapy of IE. However, further studies comparing dalbavancin with standard of care are needed.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42023430032.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of dalbavancin efficacy as a sequential therapy for infective endocarditis.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriele Maria Leanza, Emanuele Rando, Federico Frondizi, Eleonora Taddei, Francesca Giovannenze, Juan P Horcajada, Giancarlo Scoppettuolo, Carlo Torti\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s15010-024-02393-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dalbavancin is an antibiotic characterized by an extended half-life and efficacy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococci. Currently, there are only narrative reviews summarizing the evidence about the use of dalbavancin for infective endocarditis (IE), many of which are focused primarily on its use as consolidation therapy. For this reason, we conducted a systematic review to describe the clinical efficacy and the safety of dalbavancin in IE treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for available evidence using the MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science libraries, with no restrictions regarding the publication year. The risk of bias was performed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool for the comparative studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for descriptive studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies were included. All of them were observational. Native valve endocarditis was the most common kind of IE found in the studies' populations (128/263, 48.7%), followed by prosthetic valve endocarditis, and cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related endocarditis. Coagulase-negative Staphylococci were the most common pathogens isolated (83/269, 30.1%), followed by S. aureus, Enterococci spp and Streptococci spp. Five out of nine studies documented a clinical failure rate of less than 10%. Dalbavancin showed a favourable safety profile. Dalbavancin appears to be a promising option for the consolidation therapy of IE. However, further studies comparing dalbavancin with standard of care are needed.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42023430032.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-024-02393-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-024-02393-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介达巴万星(Dalbavancin)是一种抗生素,半衰期长,对耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌有效。目前,只有叙事性综述总结了有关达巴万星用于感染性心内膜炎(IE)的证据,其中许多综述主要侧重于将其用作巩固治疗。因此,我们进行了一项系统性综述,以描述达巴万星治疗 IE 的临床疗效和安全性:方法:我们使用 MEDLINE (PubMed)、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science 图书馆检索现有证据,对发表年份没有限制。比较性研究采用 Cochrane ROBINS-I 工具进行偏倚风险评估,描述性研究采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行偏倚风险评估:结果:共纳入 9 项研究。结果:共纳入 9 项研究,均为观察性研究。原发瓣膜心内膜炎是研究人群中最常见的 IE 类型(128/263,48.7%),其次是人工瓣膜心内膜炎和心血管植入式电子装置相关心内膜炎。凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌是最常见的病原体(83/269,30.1%),其次是金黄色葡萄球菌、肠球菌属和链球菌属。达尔巴万星具有良好的安全性。达尔巴万星似乎是一种很有前景的 IE 巩固治疗方案。不过,还需要进一步研究达巴万星与标准疗法的比较:CRD42023430032。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review of dalbavancin efficacy as a sequential therapy for infective endocarditis.

Introduction: Dalbavancin is an antibiotic characterized by an extended half-life and efficacy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococci. Currently, there are only narrative reviews summarizing the evidence about the use of dalbavancin for infective endocarditis (IE), many of which are focused primarily on its use as consolidation therapy. For this reason, we conducted a systematic review to describe the clinical efficacy and the safety of dalbavancin in IE treatment.

Methods: We searched for available evidence using the MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science libraries, with no restrictions regarding the publication year. The risk of bias was performed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool for the comparative studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for descriptive studies.

Results: Nine studies were included. All of them were observational. Native valve endocarditis was the most common kind of IE found in the studies' populations (128/263, 48.7%), followed by prosthetic valve endocarditis, and cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related endocarditis. Coagulase-negative Staphylococci were the most common pathogens isolated (83/269, 30.1%), followed by S. aureus, Enterococci spp and Streptococci spp. Five out of nine studies documented a clinical failure rate of less than 10%. Dalbavancin showed a favourable safety profile. Dalbavancin appears to be a promising option for the consolidation therapy of IE. However, further studies comparing dalbavancin with standard of care are needed.

Prospero registration number: CRD42023430032.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infection
Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
224
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases. Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease. Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases. Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases. Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies. Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections. In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信