在治疗眶下粘液瘤病例时进行有针对性的眼眶干预。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-27 DOI:10.4103/IJO.IJO_18_24
Rachna Meel, Mandeep S Bajaj, Neelam Pushker, Sahil Agrawal, Parag Tyagi, Alok Thakkar, Sanjay Sharma, Shuchita S Pachaury, Navneet Wig
{"title":"在治疗眶下粘液瘤病例时进行有针对性的眼眶干预。","authors":"Rachna Meel, Mandeep S Bajaj, Neelam Pushker, Sahil Agrawal, Parag Tyagi, Alok Thakkar, Sanjay Sharma, Shuchita S Pachaury, Navneet Wig","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_18_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many countries from South-East Asia reported an epidemic of sino-orbital mucormycosis (SOM), otherwise a rare disease, during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. SOM, a potentially fatal disease, is typically treated with orbital exenteration and systemic antifungals after metabolic stabilization. There is no clear evidence of survival benefit of exenteration in the literature, and thus, there have been attempts at globe conserving treatments like orbital infusion after limited debridement and intraorbital injections with Amphotericin B (IOAB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective comparative interventional study at a tertiary eye care hospital to evaluate treatment outcomes with the use of adjunctive IOAB in cases of SOM with mild to moderate orbital disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six patients of SOM with mild to moderate orbital disease were recruited in the study. In the intervention group, 23/26 (885%) eyes had stable orbital disease at the end of treatment (4-6 weeks). No deterioration in visual acuity was noted as a result of treatment. In 8/26 (30.77%) patients, inflammation was noted as a side effect of IOAB requiring temporary discontinuation of injections. The mean follow-up for cases was 14.2 months (range 12-15 months). 1/23 (4.35%) patients had relapse of orbital disease at 3 months. Twenty-one patients are alive on last follow-up. Of the patients who refused treatment (controls), 2/9 (22.22%) patients relapsed. One of these patients with relapse underwent exenteration, while the other was managed with IOAB. At a follow-up of 14 months (range 12-15 months), eight patients are alive. On evaluating the ocular parameters in salvaged eyes, improvement in extraocular movements was noted in 75-80% cases. The degree of proptosis and resistance to retropulsion did not change significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the current study, an improvement in the globe salvage rates was noted in cases of SOM with mild to moderate orbital disease treated with adjunctive IOAB as compared to controls at a mean follow-up of 14 months, although it did not achieve statistical significance. The study supports the inclusion of IOAB in routine management of mild to moderate orbital disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Targeted orbital intervention in the management of sino-orbital mucormycosis cases.\",\"authors\":\"Rachna Meel, Mandeep S Bajaj, Neelam Pushker, Sahil Agrawal, Parag Tyagi, Alok Thakkar, Sanjay Sharma, Shuchita S Pachaury, Navneet Wig\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/IJO.IJO_18_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many countries from South-East Asia reported an epidemic of sino-orbital mucormycosis (SOM), otherwise a rare disease, during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. SOM, a potentially fatal disease, is typically treated with orbital exenteration and systemic antifungals after metabolic stabilization. There is no clear evidence of survival benefit of exenteration in the literature, and thus, there have been attempts at globe conserving treatments like orbital infusion after limited debridement and intraorbital injections with Amphotericin B (IOAB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective comparative interventional study at a tertiary eye care hospital to evaluate treatment outcomes with the use of adjunctive IOAB in cases of SOM with mild to moderate orbital disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six patients of SOM with mild to moderate orbital disease were recruited in the study. In the intervention group, 23/26 (885%) eyes had stable orbital disease at the end of treatment (4-6 weeks). No deterioration in visual acuity was noted as a result of treatment. In 8/26 (30.77%) patients, inflammation was noted as a side effect of IOAB requiring temporary discontinuation of injections. The mean follow-up for cases was 14.2 months (range 12-15 months). 1/23 (4.35%) patients had relapse of orbital disease at 3 months. Twenty-one patients are alive on last follow-up. Of the patients who refused treatment (controls), 2/9 (22.22%) patients relapsed. One of these patients with relapse underwent exenteration, while the other was managed with IOAB. At a follow-up of 14 months (range 12-15 months), eight patients are alive. On evaluating the ocular parameters in salvaged eyes, improvement in extraocular movements was noted in 75-80% cases. The degree of proptosis and resistance to retropulsion did not change significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the current study, an improvement in the globe salvage rates was noted in cases of SOM with mild to moderate orbital disease treated with adjunctive IOAB as compared to controls at a mean follow-up of 14 months, although it did not achieve statistical significance. The study supports the inclusion of IOAB in routine management of mild to moderate orbital disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_18_24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_18_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在 2019 年冠状病毒疾病大流行期间,东南亚许多国家都报告了眶内粘孢子菌病(SOM)的流行,而这种疾病原本是一种罕见疾病。SOM是一种可能致命的疾病,通常在代谢稳定后采用眼眶外扩张和全身抗真菌药物治疗。文献中没有明确的证据表明外展术对患者的生存有益,因此,人们尝试了一些保球治疗方法,如有限清创后的眶内输液和眶内注射两性霉素 B(IOAB):我们在一家三级眼科医院开展了一项前瞻性比较干预研究,以评估对伴有轻度至中度眼眶病变的SOM病例辅助使用IOAB的治疗效果:研究共招募了36名轻中度眼眶病变的SOM患者。在干预组中,23/26(885%)只眼在治疗结束时(4-6周)眼眶病变稳定。治疗后未发现视力下降。8/26(30.77%)名患者出现了 IOAB 副作用,需要暂时停止注射。病例的平均随访时间为 14.2 个月(12-15 个月)。1/23(4.35%)的患者在 3 个月后眼眶疾病复发。21 名患者在最后一次随访时仍然存活。在拒绝治疗的患者(对照组)中,2/9(22.22%)的患者复发。其中一名复发患者接受了眼眶外扩张术,另一名则接受了 IOAB 治疗。在 14 个月(12-15 个月)的随访中,有 8 名患者存活。对抢救眼的眼部参数进行评估后发现,75%-80%的病例眼球外运动有所改善。结论:在本研究中,与对照组相比,轻度至中度眼眶病变的 SOM 病例在接受辅助 IOAB 治疗后,在平均 14 个月的随访中,眼球挽救率有所提高,但未达到统计学意义。该研究支持将 IOAB 纳入轻度至中度眼眶疾病的常规治疗中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Targeted orbital intervention in the management of sino-orbital mucormycosis cases.

Introduction: Many countries from South-East Asia reported an epidemic of sino-orbital mucormycosis (SOM), otherwise a rare disease, during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. SOM, a potentially fatal disease, is typically treated with orbital exenteration and systemic antifungals after metabolic stabilization. There is no clear evidence of survival benefit of exenteration in the literature, and thus, there have been attempts at globe conserving treatments like orbital infusion after limited debridement and intraorbital injections with Amphotericin B (IOAB).

Methods: We conducted a prospective comparative interventional study at a tertiary eye care hospital to evaluate treatment outcomes with the use of adjunctive IOAB in cases of SOM with mild to moderate orbital disease.

Results: Thirty-six patients of SOM with mild to moderate orbital disease were recruited in the study. In the intervention group, 23/26 (885%) eyes had stable orbital disease at the end of treatment (4-6 weeks). No deterioration in visual acuity was noted as a result of treatment. In 8/26 (30.77%) patients, inflammation was noted as a side effect of IOAB requiring temporary discontinuation of injections. The mean follow-up for cases was 14.2 months (range 12-15 months). 1/23 (4.35%) patients had relapse of orbital disease at 3 months. Twenty-one patients are alive on last follow-up. Of the patients who refused treatment (controls), 2/9 (22.22%) patients relapsed. One of these patients with relapse underwent exenteration, while the other was managed with IOAB. At a follow-up of 14 months (range 12-15 months), eight patients are alive. On evaluating the ocular parameters in salvaged eyes, improvement in extraocular movements was noted in 75-80% cases. The degree of proptosis and resistance to retropulsion did not change significantly.

Conclusion: In the current study, an improvement in the globe salvage rates was noted in cases of SOM with mild to moderate orbital disease treated with adjunctive IOAB as compared to controls at a mean follow-up of 14 months, although it did not achieve statistical significance. The study supports the inclusion of IOAB in routine management of mild to moderate orbital disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.40%
发文量
1963
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Ophthalmology covers clinical, experimental, basic science research and translational research studies related to medical, ethical and social issues in field of ophthalmology and vision science. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信