在资源有限的公立医疗机构加强透析感染控制:透析水和透析液微生物质量评估横断面研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Swathi Suravaram , Shreya Sri Gopikonda , Imran Ahmed Siddiqui , Harika Kanugula , Dhanalakshmi Gorakanti , Lakshmi Vaddanapu
{"title":"在资源有限的公立医疗机构加强透析感染控制:透析水和透析液微生物质量评估横断面研究。","authors":"Swathi Suravaram ,&nbsp;Shreya Sri Gopikonda ,&nbsp;Imran Ahmed Siddiqui ,&nbsp;Harika Kanugula ,&nbsp;Dhanalakshmi Gorakanti ,&nbsp;Lakshmi Vaddanapu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmmb.2024.100734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the microbiological quality of dialysis water and dialysate samples from hemodialysis units at a tertiary care government hospital and to assess the use of culture, endotoxin and periodicity of testing these assays to guide the actions of monitoring the quality of hemodialysis fluids, implement preventive and corrective actions, and improve the safety and outcomes of the dialysis process.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted at a 250-bedded super-specialty government hospital with a 24/7 hemodialysis unit equipped with 40 dialysis machines. Dialysis water and dialysate samples were collected monthly and analysed for microbial contamination and endotoxin levels as per AAMI guidelines. Bacterial cultures were done using Reasoner's Agar plates, and endotoxin analysis was performed using gel clot assay. Interpretation of results was based on predefined thresholds.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 740 samples processed for microbial culture 19.6 % and 80.4% were unacceptable and acceptable respectively.Among the acceptable samples 10.5 % were at action level. At the end of 2 days of incubation, 15.2%dialysis water samples and 5.1%dialysate samples had unacceptable levels of bacterial colonies and at 5days additional 10.6 % dialysis water samples and 7.7%dialysate samples were unacceptable. 21.5 % of the samples tested for endotoxin had unacceptable levels.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Regular monitoring of water quality in government healthcare hemodialysis units is crucial for quality of care, timely preventive and corrective actions for mitigating adverse outcomes. Processing cultures for 5–7 days is essential for detecting all contaminated specimens. While there might be a link between endotoxin levels and bacterial contamination, both endotoxin testing and bacterial culture independently are vital for evaluating water quality in dialysis settings. A comprehensive approach integrating various testing methods is necessary to uphold patient safety and enable necessary improvements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13284,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing infection control in dialysis at a resource limited public healthcare institute: A cross-sectional study on microbiological quality assessment of dialysis water and dialysate\",\"authors\":\"Swathi Suravaram ,&nbsp;Shreya Sri Gopikonda ,&nbsp;Imran Ahmed Siddiqui ,&nbsp;Harika Kanugula ,&nbsp;Dhanalakshmi Gorakanti ,&nbsp;Lakshmi Vaddanapu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijmmb.2024.100734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the microbiological quality of dialysis water and dialysate samples from hemodialysis units at a tertiary care government hospital and to assess the use of culture, endotoxin and periodicity of testing these assays to guide the actions of monitoring the quality of hemodialysis fluids, implement preventive and corrective actions, and improve the safety and outcomes of the dialysis process.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted at a 250-bedded super-specialty government hospital with a 24/7 hemodialysis unit equipped with 40 dialysis machines. Dialysis water and dialysate samples were collected monthly and analysed for microbial contamination and endotoxin levels as per AAMI guidelines. Bacterial cultures were done using Reasoner's Agar plates, and endotoxin analysis was performed using gel clot assay. Interpretation of results was based on predefined thresholds.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 740 samples processed for microbial culture 19.6 % and 80.4% were unacceptable and acceptable respectively.Among the acceptable samples 10.5 % were at action level. At the end of 2 days of incubation, 15.2%dialysis water samples and 5.1%dialysate samples had unacceptable levels of bacterial colonies and at 5days additional 10.6 % dialysis water samples and 7.7%dialysate samples were unacceptable. 21.5 % of the samples tested for endotoxin had unacceptable levels.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Regular monitoring of water quality in government healthcare hemodialysis units is crucial for quality of care, timely preventive and corrective actions for mitigating adverse outcomes. Processing cultures for 5–7 days is essential for detecting all contaminated specimens. While there might be a link between endotoxin levels and bacterial contamination, both endotoxin testing and bacterial culture independently are vital for evaluating water quality in dialysis settings. A comprehensive approach integrating various testing methods is necessary to uphold patient safety and enable necessary improvements.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0255085724002093\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0255085724002093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估一家三级护理政府医院血液透析室透析水和透析液样本的微生物质量,并评估培养、内毒素和检测周期的使用情况,以指导监测血液透析液质量的行动,实施预防和纠正措施,提高透析过程的安全性和效果:在一家拥有 250 张床位的政府超级专科医院开展了一项横断面研究,该医院的血液透析室全天候配备了 40 台透析机。每月收集透析用水和透析液样本,并根据美国血液透析学会(AAMI)指南分析微生物污染和内毒素水平。细菌培养采用 Reasoner's 琼脂平板,内毒素分析采用凝胶凝块测定法。结果根据预先确定的阈值进行解释:在 740 个微生物培养样本中,分别有 19.6% 和 80.4% 的样本不合格和合格。在培养 2 天后,15.2% 的透析水样本和 5.1%的透析液样本中的细菌菌落数量达到了不可接受的水平;在培养 5 天后,又有 10.6% 的透析水样本和 7.7% 的透析液样本中的细菌菌落数量达到了不可接受的水平。21.5%的内毒素检测样本达到不可接受的水平:结论:定期监测政府医疗机构血液透析室的水质对提高医疗质量、及时采取预防和纠正措施以减轻不良后果至关重要。将培养物处理 5-7 天对于检测所有受污染标本至关重要。虽然内毒素水平与细菌污染之间可能存在联系,但独立的内毒素检测和细菌培养对于评估透析环境中的水质至关重要。要维护患者安全并进行必要的改进,就必须采用综合各种检测方法的综合方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing infection control in dialysis at a resource limited public healthcare institute: A cross-sectional study on microbiological quality assessment of dialysis water and dialysate

Purpose

To evaluate the microbiological quality of dialysis water and dialysate samples from hemodialysis units at a tertiary care government hospital and to assess the use of culture, endotoxin and periodicity of testing these assays to guide the actions of monitoring the quality of hemodialysis fluids, implement preventive and corrective actions, and improve the safety and outcomes of the dialysis process.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted at a 250-bedded super-specialty government hospital with a 24/7 hemodialysis unit equipped with 40 dialysis machines. Dialysis water and dialysate samples were collected monthly and analysed for microbial contamination and endotoxin levels as per AAMI guidelines. Bacterial cultures were done using Reasoner's Agar plates, and endotoxin analysis was performed using gel clot assay. Interpretation of results was based on predefined thresholds.

Results

Among the 740 samples processed for microbial culture 19.6 % and 80.4% were unacceptable and acceptable respectively.Among the acceptable samples 10.5 % were at action level. At the end of 2 days of incubation, 15.2%dialysis water samples and 5.1%dialysate samples had unacceptable levels of bacterial colonies and at 5days additional 10.6 % dialysis water samples and 7.7%dialysate samples were unacceptable. 21.5 % of the samples tested for endotoxin had unacceptable levels.

Conclusions

Regular monitoring of water quality in government healthcare hemodialysis units is crucial for quality of care, timely preventive and corrective actions for mitigating adverse outcomes. Processing cultures for 5–7 days is essential for detecting all contaminated specimens. While there might be a link between endotoxin levels and bacterial contamination, both endotoxin testing and bacterial culture independently are vital for evaluating water quality in dialysis settings. A comprehensive approach integrating various testing methods is necessary to uphold patient safety and enable necessary improvements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
73 days
期刊介绍: Manuscripts of high standard in the form of original research, multicentric studies, meta analysis, are accepted. Current reports can be submitted as brief communications. Case reports must include review of current literature, clinical details, outcome and follow up. Letters to the editor must be a comment on or pertain to a manuscript already published in the IJMM or in relation to preliminary communication of a larger study. Review articles, Special Articles or Guest Editorials are accepted on invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信