{"title":"大胆尝试,从冷冻开始!冷福尔马林固定结直肠癌标本可为下游分子分析提供优质的 DNA 和 RNA。","authors":"Ennio Nano, Alessandro Gambella, Michele Paudice, Anna Garuti, Simona Pigozzi, Luca Valle, Federica Grillo, Luca Mastracci","doi":"10.1007/s00418-024-02326-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of cold formalin fixation (CFF; i.e., fixating tissue samples with 4 °C precooled formalin) recently attracted further attention owing to its putative improved ability to preserve nucleic acid compared with standard room temperature formalin (SFF). In this study, we aimed to assess the effect of four formalin-based fixation protocols (SFF, CFF, delayed formalin fixation-DFF, and cold formalin hyperfixation; CFH) on both DNA and RNA quality. We collected 97 colorectal cancer (CRC) and analyzed 23 metrics of nucleic acid quantity and quality yield using a multiplatform approach by combining spectrophotometric, fluorimetric, electrophoretic, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. Following confirmation of fixation-protocol-related different effects via clustering analysis, CFF presented best metrics compared with all protocols, specifically positive coefficients of DV1000-60000, DV2/DV1, DNA λ ratio 260/230, and ABL gene expression absolute copies, and negative coefficient of DV150-1000. The SFF subgroup presented a positive coefficient of DV150-1000 and negative coefficients for DV1000-60000, DV2/DV1, RNA λ ratio 260/230, RNA QuBit concentration, DV100/200, RNA electrophoresis concentration and absolute quantity, and ABL copies. Overall, we confirmed the superior yield performances of CFF preservation for both DNA and RNA compared with the other protocols in our series of CRC samples. Pending further validations and clarification of the specific mechanisms behind these findings, our study supports the implementation of CFF in the pathology unit routine specimen management for tumor tissue molecular profiling.</p>","PeriodicalId":13107,"journal":{"name":"Histochemistry and Cell Biology","volume":" ","pages":"541-550"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11455702/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Be bold, start cold! cold formalin fixation of colorectal cancer specimens granted superior DNA and RNA quality for downstream molecular analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ennio Nano, Alessandro Gambella, Michele Paudice, Anna Garuti, Simona Pigozzi, Luca Valle, Federica Grillo, Luca Mastracci\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00418-024-02326-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The use of cold formalin fixation (CFF; i.e., fixating tissue samples with 4 °C precooled formalin) recently attracted further attention owing to its putative improved ability to preserve nucleic acid compared with standard room temperature formalin (SFF). In this study, we aimed to assess the effect of four formalin-based fixation protocols (SFF, CFF, delayed formalin fixation-DFF, and cold formalin hyperfixation; CFH) on both DNA and RNA quality. We collected 97 colorectal cancer (CRC) and analyzed 23 metrics of nucleic acid quantity and quality yield using a multiplatform approach by combining spectrophotometric, fluorimetric, electrophoretic, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. Following confirmation of fixation-protocol-related different effects via clustering analysis, CFF presented best metrics compared with all protocols, specifically positive coefficients of DV1000-60000, DV2/DV1, DNA λ ratio 260/230, and ABL gene expression absolute copies, and negative coefficient of DV150-1000. The SFF subgroup presented a positive coefficient of DV150-1000 and negative coefficients for DV1000-60000, DV2/DV1, RNA λ ratio 260/230, RNA QuBit concentration, DV100/200, RNA electrophoresis concentration and absolute quantity, and ABL copies. Overall, we confirmed the superior yield performances of CFF preservation for both DNA and RNA compared with the other protocols in our series of CRC samples. Pending further validations and clarification of the specific mechanisms behind these findings, our study supports the implementation of CFF in the pathology unit routine specimen management for tumor tissue molecular profiling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Histochemistry and Cell Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"541-550\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11455702/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Histochemistry and Cell Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-024-02326-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Histochemistry and Cell Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-024-02326-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Be bold, start cold! cold formalin fixation of colorectal cancer specimens granted superior DNA and RNA quality for downstream molecular analysis.
The use of cold formalin fixation (CFF; i.e., fixating tissue samples with 4 °C precooled formalin) recently attracted further attention owing to its putative improved ability to preserve nucleic acid compared with standard room temperature formalin (SFF). In this study, we aimed to assess the effect of four formalin-based fixation protocols (SFF, CFF, delayed formalin fixation-DFF, and cold formalin hyperfixation; CFH) on both DNA and RNA quality. We collected 97 colorectal cancer (CRC) and analyzed 23 metrics of nucleic acid quantity and quality yield using a multiplatform approach by combining spectrophotometric, fluorimetric, electrophoretic, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. Following confirmation of fixation-protocol-related different effects via clustering analysis, CFF presented best metrics compared with all protocols, specifically positive coefficients of DV1000-60000, DV2/DV1, DNA λ ratio 260/230, and ABL gene expression absolute copies, and negative coefficient of DV150-1000. The SFF subgroup presented a positive coefficient of DV150-1000 and negative coefficients for DV1000-60000, DV2/DV1, RNA λ ratio 260/230, RNA QuBit concentration, DV100/200, RNA electrophoresis concentration and absolute quantity, and ABL copies. Overall, we confirmed the superior yield performances of CFF preservation for both DNA and RNA compared with the other protocols in our series of CRC samples. Pending further validations and clarification of the specific mechanisms behind these findings, our study supports the implementation of CFF in the pathology unit routine specimen management for tumor tissue molecular profiling.
期刊介绍:
Histochemistry and Cell Biology is devoted to the field of molecular histology and cell biology, publishing original articles dealing with the localization and identification of molecular components, metabolic activities and cell biological aspects of cells and tissues. Coverage extends to the development, application, and/or evaluation of methods and probes that can be used in the entire area of histochemistry and cell biology.