Yuta Yoshino, Naoko Fudaka, Yumiko Shibasaki, Miyuki Ogawa, Yoshimasa Watanabe
{"title":"标准化催眠药束对住院期间失眠和降低跌倒率的影响:单中心回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Yuta Yoshino, Naoko Fudaka, Yumiko Shibasaki, Miyuki Ogawa, Yoshimasa Watanabe","doi":"10.1111/ggi.14985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Although the use of benzodiazepine receptor agonists is a risk factor for falls and fractures, whether benzodiazepine-avoiding hypnotic bundles are beneficial in clinical settings remains unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A new hospital-wide standardized hypnotic bundle for insomnia, with suvorexant as the first choice, was created for clinical purposes. This single-center retrospective cohort study involved a pre-post design and adult inpatients who had had falls. The primary outcome was the total fall rate in the pre-post groups. Additionally, the level change in the fall-rate trend for each month at standardization of the new hypnotic bundle was analyzed. The numbers of hypnotic-related falls and injuries requiring treatment were evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups, except for patients with COVID-19. Overall, 31 736 patients were included in this study. The total number of falls was 924 (3.42‰) in the pre-standardization group and 837 (3.31‰) in the post-standardization group, with no significant difference. An interrupted time-series analysis of the level change in the fall rate revealed that the gap in trend at standardization was –11%, with no significance. Hypnotic-related falls were 300 (1.11‰) versus 213 (0.84‰), and the injury incidences were 251 (0.93‰) versus 181 (0.71‰) in the pre and post groups, respectively, showing a significant reduction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The standardization of the new hypnotic bundle for insomnia did not help achieve a significant reduction in total falls. However, our findings suggest that this bundle has the potential to reduce hypnotic-related falls and injuries in inpatients who have had falls. <b>Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 1144–1149</b>.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of standardized hypnotic bundles on insomnia during hospitalization and reducing fall rate: A single-center retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Yuta Yoshino, Naoko Fudaka, Yumiko Shibasaki, Miyuki Ogawa, Yoshimasa Watanabe\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ggi.14985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although the use of benzodiazepine receptor agonists is a risk factor for falls and fractures, whether benzodiazepine-avoiding hypnotic bundles are beneficial in clinical settings remains unclear.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A new hospital-wide standardized hypnotic bundle for insomnia, with suvorexant as the first choice, was created for clinical purposes. This single-center retrospective cohort study involved a pre-post design and adult inpatients who had had falls. The primary outcome was the total fall rate in the pre-post groups. Additionally, the level change in the fall-rate trend for each month at standardization of the new hypnotic bundle was analyzed. The numbers of hypnotic-related falls and injuries requiring treatment were evaluated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups, except for patients with COVID-19. Overall, 31 736 patients were included in this study. The total number of falls was 924 (3.42‰) in the pre-standardization group and 837 (3.31‰) in the post-standardization group, with no significant difference. An interrupted time-series analysis of the level change in the fall rate revealed that the gap in trend at standardization was –11%, with no significance. Hypnotic-related falls were 300 (1.11‰) versus 213 (0.84‰), and the injury incidences were 251 (0.93‰) versus 181 (0.71‰) in the pre and post groups, respectively, showing a significant reduction.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The standardization of the new hypnotic bundle for insomnia did not help achieve a significant reduction in total falls. However, our findings suggest that this bundle has the potential to reduce hypnotic-related falls and injuries in inpatients who have had falls. <b>Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 1144–1149</b>.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geriatrics & Gerontology International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geriatrics & Gerontology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggi.14985\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggi.14985","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of standardized hypnotic bundles on insomnia during hospitalization and reducing fall rate: A single-center retrospective cohort study
Aim
Although the use of benzodiazepine receptor agonists is a risk factor for falls and fractures, whether benzodiazepine-avoiding hypnotic bundles are beneficial in clinical settings remains unclear.
Methods
A new hospital-wide standardized hypnotic bundle for insomnia, with suvorexant as the first choice, was created for clinical purposes. This single-center retrospective cohort study involved a pre-post design and adult inpatients who had had falls. The primary outcome was the total fall rate in the pre-post groups. Additionally, the level change in the fall-rate trend for each month at standardization of the new hypnotic bundle was analyzed. The numbers of hypnotic-related falls and injuries requiring treatment were evaluated.
Results
There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups, except for patients with COVID-19. Overall, 31 736 patients were included in this study. The total number of falls was 924 (3.42‰) in the pre-standardization group and 837 (3.31‰) in the post-standardization group, with no significant difference. An interrupted time-series analysis of the level change in the fall rate revealed that the gap in trend at standardization was –11%, with no significance. Hypnotic-related falls were 300 (1.11‰) versus 213 (0.84‰), and the injury incidences were 251 (0.93‰) versus 181 (0.71‰) in the pre and post groups, respectively, showing a significant reduction.
Conclusions
The standardization of the new hypnotic bundle for insomnia did not help achieve a significant reduction in total falls. However, our findings suggest that this bundle has the potential to reduce hypnotic-related falls and injuries in inpatients who have had falls. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 1144–1149.
期刊介绍:
Geriatrics & Gerontology International is the official Journal of the Japan Geriatrics Society, reflecting the growing importance of the subject area in developed economies and their particular significance to a country like Japan with a large aging population. Geriatrics & Gerontology International is now an international publication with contributions from around the world and published four times per year.