编制老年人体育活动简明问卷。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Koutatsu Nagai, Ryota Matsuzawa, Hiroyuki Sasai, Kayoko Tamaki, Hiroshi Kusunoki, Yosuke Wada, Shotaro Tsuji, Kana Hashimoto, Takara Mori, Ken Shinmura
{"title":"编制老年人体育活动简明问卷。","authors":"Koutatsu Nagai, Ryota Matsuzawa, Hiroyuki Sasai, Kayoko Tamaki, Hiroshi Kusunoki, Yosuke Wada, Shotaro Tsuji, Kana Hashimoto, Takara Mori, Ken Shinmura","doi":"10.1111/ggi.14986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to develop and evaluate the Brief Older Adults' Physical Activity Questionnaire (BOPAQ), which was designed to quickly assess moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in community-dwelling older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a cross-sectional study design involving 165 older participants. The BOPAQ calculated weekly MVPA duration based on two questions regarding the number of days per week engaged in MVPA and the daily duration of activity. Validity was assessed by correlating the MVPA durations derived from the BOPAQ with those obtained from the ActiGraph and International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form. Reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient, and measurement errors were analyzed using Bland-Altman plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BOPAQ reasonably correlated with accelerometer-based MVPA (rho = 0.297) and showed good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.87). In contrast, the correlation between the International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form and accelerometer-based MVPA was poor (rho = 0.139). The cut-off value for the BOPAQ was set to identify participants engaging in <150 min of objectively measured physical activity per week, corresponding to the 150-min threshold. However, the area under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic analyses was not significantly high (0.601, 95% CI 0.514-0.688). The Bland-Altman plots showed an underestimation bias of 51.72 min/week (95% CI 1.61-101.84) and showed heteroscedasticity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite some measurement errors, the BOPAQ is an available tool for assessing MVPA in community-dwelling older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; ••: ••-••.</p>","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a brief older adults' physical activity questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Koutatsu Nagai, Ryota Matsuzawa, Hiroyuki Sasai, Kayoko Tamaki, Hiroshi Kusunoki, Yosuke Wada, Shotaro Tsuji, Kana Hashimoto, Takara Mori, Ken Shinmura\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ggi.14986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to develop and evaluate the Brief Older Adults' Physical Activity Questionnaire (BOPAQ), which was designed to quickly assess moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in community-dwelling older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a cross-sectional study design involving 165 older participants. The BOPAQ calculated weekly MVPA duration based on two questions regarding the number of days per week engaged in MVPA and the daily duration of activity. Validity was assessed by correlating the MVPA durations derived from the BOPAQ with those obtained from the ActiGraph and International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form. Reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient, and measurement errors were analyzed using Bland-Altman plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BOPAQ reasonably correlated with accelerometer-based MVPA (rho = 0.297) and showed good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.87). In contrast, the correlation between the International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form and accelerometer-based MVPA was poor (rho = 0.139). The cut-off value for the BOPAQ was set to identify participants engaging in <150 min of objectively measured physical activity per week, corresponding to the 150-min threshold. However, the area under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic analyses was not significantly high (0.601, 95% CI 0.514-0.688). The Bland-Altman plots showed an underestimation bias of 51.72 min/week (95% CI 1.61-101.84) and showed heteroscedasticity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite some measurement errors, the BOPAQ is an available tool for assessing MVPA in community-dwelling older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; ••: ••-••.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geriatrics & Gerontology International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geriatrics & Gerontology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.14986\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.14986","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在开发和评估 "简明老年人体力活动问卷"(BOPAQ),该问卷旨在快速评估社区老年人的中强度体力活动(MVPA):我们采用横断面研究设计,共有 165 名老年人参与。BOPAQ 根据每周进行 MVPA 的天数和每天活动的持续时间这两个问题计算每周 MVPA 的持续时间。通过将 BOPAQ 得出的 MVPA 持续时间与 ActiGraph 和国际体力活动问卷简表得出的 MVPA 持续时间相关联,对其有效性进行了评估。可靠性采用类内相关系数进行评估,测量误差采用 Bland-Altman 图进行分析:结果:BOPAQ 与基于加速度计的 MVPA 有合理的相关性(rho = 0.297),并显示出良好的测试-再测试可靠性(类内相关系数为 0.78,95% CI 为 0.64-0.87)。相比之下,国际体力活动问卷简表与加速度计 MVPA 之间的相关性较差(rho = 0.139)。设定 BOPAQ 的临界值是为了识别参与结论的参与者:尽管存在一些测量误差,但 BOPAQ 是评估社区老年人 MVPA 的可用工具。Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; --:-----.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a brief older adults' physical activity questionnaire.

Aim: This study aimed to develop and evaluate the Brief Older Adults' Physical Activity Questionnaire (BOPAQ), which was designed to quickly assess moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in community-dwelling older adults.

Methods: We used a cross-sectional study design involving 165 older participants. The BOPAQ calculated weekly MVPA duration based on two questions regarding the number of days per week engaged in MVPA and the daily duration of activity. Validity was assessed by correlating the MVPA durations derived from the BOPAQ with those obtained from the ActiGraph and International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form. Reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient, and measurement errors were analyzed using Bland-Altman plots.

Results: The BOPAQ reasonably correlated with accelerometer-based MVPA (rho = 0.297) and showed good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.87). In contrast, the correlation between the International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form and accelerometer-based MVPA was poor (rho = 0.139). The cut-off value for the BOPAQ was set to identify participants engaging in <150 min of objectively measured physical activity per week, corresponding to the 150-min threshold. However, the area under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic analyses was not significantly high (0.601, 95% CI 0.514-0.688). The Bland-Altman plots showed an underestimation bias of 51.72 min/week (95% CI 1.61-101.84) and showed heteroscedasticity.

Conclusion: Despite some measurement errors, the BOPAQ is an available tool for assessing MVPA in community-dwelling older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; ••: ••-••.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatrics & Gerontology International is the official Journal of the Japan Geriatrics Society, reflecting the growing importance of the subject area in developed economies and their particular significance to a country like Japan with a large aging population. Geriatrics & Gerontology International is now an international publication with contributions from around the world and published four times per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信