根据临床表现确定药物洗脱支架植入术后十年临床疗效--DECADE 合作项目的启示。

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Fabian Starnecker, J J Coughlan, Lisette Okkels Jensen, Sarah Bär, Sebastian Kufner, Salvatore Brugaletta, Lorenz Räber, Michael Maeng, Luis Ortega-Paz, Dik Heg, Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz, Manel Sabaté, Stephan Windecker, Adnan Kastrati, Kevin Kris Warnakula Olesen, Salvatore Cassese
{"title":"根据临床表现确定药物洗脱支架植入术后十年临床疗效--DECADE 合作项目的启示。","authors":"Fabian Starnecker, J J Coughlan, Lisette Okkels Jensen, Sarah Bär, Sebastian Kufner, Salvatore Brugaletta, Lorenz Räber, Michael Maeng, Luis Ortega-Paz, Dik Heg, Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz, Manel Sabaté, Stephan Windecker, Adnan Kastrati, Kevin Kris Warnakula Olesen, Salvatore Cassese","doi":"10.1111/eci.14323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Investigations of very long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) according to clinical presentation are scarce. Here, we investigated the 10-year clinical outcomes of patients undergoing DES-PCI according to clinical presentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient-level data from five randomized trials with 10-year follow-up after DES-PCI were pooled. Patients were dichotomized into acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) groups as per clinical presentation. The primary outcome was all-cause death. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), definite stent thrombosis (ST) and repeat revascularization involving the target lesion (TLR), target vessel (TVR) or non-target vessel (nTVR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 9700 patients included in this analysis, 4557 presented with ACS and 5143 with CCS. Compared with CCS patients, ACS patients had a higher risk of all-cause death and nTVR in the first year, but comparable risk thereafter. In addition, ACS patients had a higher risk of MI [adjusted hazard ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval (1.04-1.41)] and definite ST [adjusted hazard ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval (1.14-1.92)], while the risk of TLR and TVR was not significantly different up to 10-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to CCS patients, ACS patients treated with PCI and DES implantation have an increased risk of all-cause death and repeat revascularization of remote vessels up to 1 year, with no significant differences thereafter and up to 10-year follow-up. ACS patients have a consistently higher risk of MI and definite ST. Whether these differences persist with current antithrombotic and secondary prevention therapies requires further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12013,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"e14323"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ten-year clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stents implantation according to clinical presentation-Insights from the DECADE cooperation.\",\"authors\":\"Fabian Starnecker, J J Coughlan, Lisette Okkels Jensen, Sarah Bär, Sebastian Kufner, Salvatore Brugaletta, Lorenz Räber, Michael Maeng, Luis Ortega-Paz, Dik Heg, Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz, Manel Sabaté, Stephan Windecker, Adnan Kastrati, Kevin Kris Warnakula Olesen, Salvatore Cassese\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eci.14323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Investigations of very long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) according to clinical presentation are scarce. Here, we investigated the 10-year clinical outcomes of patients undergoing DES-PCI according to clinical presentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient-level data from five randomized trials with 10-year follow-up after DES-PCI were pooled. Patients were dichotomized into acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) groups as per clinical presentation. The primary outcome was all-cause death. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), definite stent thrombosis (ST) and repeat revascularization involving the target lesion (TLR), target vessel (TVR) or non-target vessel (nTVR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 9700 patients included in this analysis, 4557 presented with ACS and 5143 with CCS. Compared with CCS patients, ACS patients had a higher risk of all-cause death and nTVR in the first year, but comparable risk thereafter. In addition, ACS patients had a higher risk of MI [adjusted hazard ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval (1.04-1.41)] and definite ST [adjusted hazard ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval (1.14-1.92)], while the risk of TLR and TVR was not significantly different up to 10-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to CCS patients, ACS patients treated with PCI and DES implantation have an increased risk of all-cause death and repeat revascularization of remote vessels up to 1 year, with no significant differences thereafter and up to 10-year follow-up. ACS patients have a consistently higher risk of MI and definite ST. Whether these differences persist with current antithrombotic and secondary prevention therapies requires further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.14323\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.14323","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:根据临床表现对使用药物洗脱支架(DES)进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的长期疗效进行调查的研究很少。在此,我们根据临床表现调查了接受 DES-PCI 患者的 10 年临床预后:方法:汇总了五项随机试验中接受 DES-PCI 术后 10 年随访的患者数据。根据临床表现将患者分为急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)组和慢性冠状动脉综合征(CCS)组。主要结果是全因死亡。次要结果是心血管死亡、心肌梗死(MI)、明确的支架血栓形成(ST)和涉及靶病变(TLR)、靶血管(TVR)或非靶血管(nTVR)的重复血管再通:在纳入本次分析的 9700 名患者中,4557 人患有 ACS,5143 人患有 CCS。与 CCS 患者相比,ACS 患者第一年的全因死亡和 nTVR 风险较高,但之后的风险相当。此外,ACS患者发生心肌梗死[调整后危险比为1.21,95%置信区间为(1.04-1.41)]和明确ST[调整后危险比为1.48,95%置信区间为(1.14-1.92)]的风险较高,而TLR和TVR的风险在10年随访期间没有显著差异:结论:与CCS患者相比,接受PCI和DES植入治疗的ACS患者全因死亡和远端血管重复血运重建的风险在1年内会增加,但在1年后和10年随访期间无明显差异。ACS 患者发生 MI 和明确 ST 的风险一直较高。这些差异在目前的抗血栓和二级预防疗法中是否仍然存在,还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ten-year clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stents implantation according to clinical presentation-Insights from the DECADE cooperation.

Background: Investigations of very long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) according to clinical presentation are scarce. Here, we investigated the 10-year clinical outcomes of patients undergoing DES-PCI according to clinical presentation.

Methods: Patient-level data from five randomized trials with 10-year follow-up after DES-PCI were pooled. Patients were dichotomized into acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) groups as per clinical presentation. The primary outcome was all-cause death. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), definite stent thrombosis (ST) and repeat revascularization involving the target lesion (TLR), target vessel (TVR) or non-target vessel (nTVR).

Results: Of the 9700 patients included in this analysis, 4557 presented with ACS and 5143 with CCS. Compared with CCS patients, ACS patients had a higher risk of all-cause death and nTVR in the first year, but comparable risk thereafter. In addition, ACS patients had a higher risk of MI [adjusted hazard ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval (1.04-1.41)] and definite ST [adjusted hazard ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval (1.14-1.92)], while the risk of TLR and TVR was not significantly different up to 10-year follow-up.

Conclusions: Compared to CCS patients, ACS patients treated with PCI and DES implantation have an increased risk of all-cause death and repeat revascularization of remote vessels up to 1 year, with no significant differences thereafter and up to 10-year follow-up. ACS patients have a consistently higher risk of MI and definite ST. Whether these differences persist with current antithrombotic and secondary prevention therapies requires further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.60%
发文量
192
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJCI considers any original contribution from the most sophisticated basic molecular sciences to applied clinical and translational research and evidence-based medicine across a broad range of subspecialties. The EJCI publishes reports of high-quality research that pertain to the genetic, molecular, cellular, or physiological basis of human biology and disease, as well as research that addresses prevalence, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of disease. We are primarily interested in studies directly pertinent to humans, but submission of robust in vitro and animal work is also encouraged. Interdisciplinary work and research using innovative methods and combinations of laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological methodologies and techniques is of great interest to the journal. Several categories of manuscripts (for detailed description see below) are considered: editorials, original articles (also including randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses), reviews (narrative reviews), opinion articles (including debates, perspectives and commentaries); and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信