Cesar Rodrigo Zoni, Matthew Dean, Laurel A Copeland, Chittoor B Sai Sudhakar, Yazhini Ravi
{"title":"美国心脏移植死亡率的地区差异。","authors":"Cesar Rodrigo Zoni, Matthew Dean, Laurel A Copeland, Chittoor B Sai Sudhakar, Yazhini Ravi","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mortality after heart transplantation can be influenced by multiple factors. This study analysed its variation across four regions of the USA.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Analyse the differences in mortality among patients receiving a heart transplant across four regions of the USA.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing registry was analysed for adult heart transplant recipients from 1987 to 2023. They were divided into four regions according to heart transplant recipients' residence: the Northeast, Midwest, South, and West. The endpoint was all-cause mortality. A total of 33 482 heart transplant recipients were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics differed by region. The median survival (years) was lower in the South [Northeast 12.9 (6.1-17.9), Midwest 13.1 (6.5-18.1), South 11.6 (5.3-16.8), and West 13.6 (7.0-18.6); P < 0.0001]. Mortality incidence rate was greater in the South. When compared to the Northeast, in the unadjusted analysis, mortality was higher in the South {hazard ratio (HR) 1.13 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.19], P < 0.001} and lower in the West [HR 0.89 (95% CI 0.83-0.94), P < 0.001]. After adjusting for demographic and clinical variables, only the South retained significant differences [HR 1.17 (95% CI 1.10-1.24), P < 0.001]. Mortality significantly increased in all regions after 2018.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mortality of heart transplant recipients varies across region of residence in the USA. A significant increase in adjusted mortality was observed in the South. These findings suggest that there are regional disparities in the mortality rates of heart transplant recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"166-173"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional disparities in heart transplant mortality in the USA.\",\"authors\":\"Cesar Rodrigo Zoni, Matthew Dean, Laurel A Copeland, Chittoor B Sai Sudhakar, Yazhini Ravi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mortality after heart transplantation can be influenced by multiple factors. This study analysed its variation across four regions of the USA.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Analyse the differences in mortality among patients receiving a heart transplant across four regions of the USA.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing registry was analysed for adult heart transplant recipients from 1987 to 2023. They were divided into four regions according to heart transplant recipients' residence: the Northeast, Midwest, South, and West. The endpoint was all-cause mortality. A total of 33 482 heart transplant recipients were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics differed by region. The median survival (years) was lower in the South [Northeast 12.9 (6.1-17.9), Midwest 13.1 (6.5-18.1), South 11.6 (5.3-16.8), and West 13.6 (7.0-18.6); P < 0.0001]. Mortality incidence rate was greater in the South. When compared to the Northeast, in the unadjusted analysis, mortality was higher in the South {hazard ratio (HR) 1.13 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.19], P < 0.001} and lower in the West [HR 0.89 (95% CI 0.83-0.94), P < 0.001]. After adjusting for demographic and clinical variables, only the South retained significant differences [HR 1.17 (95% CI 1.10-1.24), P < 0.001]. Mortality significantly increased in all regions after 2018.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mortality of heart transplant recipients varies across region of residence in the USA. A significant increase in adjusted mortality was observed in the South. These findings suggest that there are regional disparities in the mortality rates of heart transplant recipients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"166-173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae083\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Regional disparities in heart transplant mortality in the USA.
Background: Mortality after heart transplantation can be influenced by multiple factors. This study analysed its variation across four regions of the USA.
Objective: Analyse the differences in mortality among patients receiving a heart transplant across four regions of the USA.
Methods and results: Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing registry was analysed for adult heart transplant recipients from 1987 to 2023. They were divided into four regions according to heart transplant recipients' residence: the Northeast, Midwest, South, and West. The endpoint was all-cause mortality. A total of 33 482 heart transplant recipients were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics differed by region. The median survival (years) was lower in the South [Northeast 12.9 (6.1-17.9), Midwest 13.1 (6.5-18.1), South 11.6 (5.3-16.8), and West 13.6 (7.0-18.6); P < 0.0001]. Mortality incidence rate was greater in the South. When compared to the Northeast, in the unadjusted analysis, mortality was higher in the South {hazard ratio (HR) 1.13 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.19], P < 0.001} and lower in the West [HR 0.89 (95% CI 0.83-0.94), P < 0.001]. After adjusting for demographic and clinical variables, only the South retained significant differences [HR 1.17 (95% CI 1.10-1.24), P < 0.001]. Mortality significantly increased in all regions after 2018.
Conclusion: Mortality of heart transplant recipients varies across region of residence in the USA. A significant increase in adjusted mortality was observed in the South. These findings suggest that there are regional disparities in the mortality rates of heart transplant recipients.
期刊介绍:
European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.