用新型人工智能技术量化常规冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术患者的冠状动脉炎症和心血管风险的成本效益。

IF 5.4 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Apostolos Tsiachristas, Kenneth Chan, Elizabeth Wahome, Ben Kearns, Parijat Patel, Maria Lyasheva, Nigar Syed, Sam Fry, Thomas Halborg, Henry West, Ed Nicol, David Adlam, Bhavik Modi, Attila Kardos, John P Greenwood, Nikant Sabharwal, Giovanni Luigi De Maria, Shahzad Munir, Elisa McAlindon, Yogesh Sohan, Pete Tomlins, Muhammad Siddique, Cheerag Shirodaria, Ron Blankstein, Milind Desai, Stefan Neubauer, Keith M Channon, John Deanfield, Ron Akehurst, Charalambos Antoniades
{"title":"用新型人工智能技术量化常规冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术患者的冠状动脉炎症和心血管风险的成本效益。","authors":"Apostolos Tsiachristas, Kenneth Chan, Elizabeth Wahome, Ben Kearns, Parijat Patel, Maria Lyasheva, Nigar Syed, Sam Fry, Thomas Halborg, Henry West, Ed Nicol, David Adlam, Bhavik Modi, Attila Kardos, John P Greenwood, Nikant Sabharwal, Giovanni Luigi De Maria, Shahzad Munir, Elisa McAlindon, Yogesh Sohan, Pete Tomlins, Muhammad Siddique, Cheerag Shirodaria, Ron Blankstein, Milind Desai, Stefan Neubauer, Keith M Channon, John Deanfield, Ron Akehurst, Charalambos Antoniades","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) is a first line investigation for chest pain in patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). However, many acute cardiac events occur in the absence of obstructive CAD. We assessed the lifetime cost-effectiveness of integrating a novel artificial intelligence-enhanced image analysis algorithm (AI-Risk) that stratifies the risk of cardiac events by quantifying coronary inflammation, combined with the extent of coronary artery plaque and clinical risk factors, by analysing images from routine CCTA.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A hybrid decision-tree with population cohort Markov model was developed from 3,393 consecutive patients who underwent routine CCTA for suspected obstructive CAD and followed up for major adverse cardiac events over a median(IQR) of 7.7(6.4-9.1) years. In a prospective real-world evaluation survey of 744 consecutive patients undergoing CCTA for chest pain investigation, the availability of AI-Risk assessment led to treatment initiation or intensification in 45% of patients. In a further prospective study of 1,214 consecutive patients with extensive guideline recommended cardiovascular risk profiling, AI-Risk stratification led to treatment initiation or intensification in 39% of patients beyond the current clinical guideline recommendations. Treatment guided by AI-Risk modelled over a lifetime horizon could lead to fewer cardiac events (relative reductions of 4%, 4%, 11%, and 12% for myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, heart failure and cardiac death, respectively). Implementing AI-Risk classification in routine interpretation of CCTA is highly likely to be cost-effective (Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio £1,371-3,244), both in scenarios of current guideline compliance or when applied only to patients without obstructive CAD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with standard care, the addition of AI-Risk assessment in routine CCTA interpretation is cost effective, by refining risk guided medical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-effectiveness of a novel AI technology to quantify coronary inflammation and cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing routine Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.\",\"authors\":\"Apostolos Tsiachristas, Kenneth Chan, Elizabeth Wahome, Ben Kearns, Parijat Patel, Maria Lyasheva, Nigar Syed, Sam Fry, Thomas Halborg, Henry West, Ed Nicol, David Adlam, Bhavik Modi, Attila Kardos, John P Greenwood, Nikant Sabharwal, Giovanni Luigi De Maria, Shahzad Munir, Elisa McAlindon, Yogesh Sohan, Pete Tomlins, Muhammad Siddique, Cheerag Shirodaria, Ron Blankstein, Milind Desai, Stefan Neubauer, Keith M Channon, John Deanfield, Ron Akehurst, Charalambos Antoniades\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) is a first line investigation for chest pain in patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). However, many acute cardiac events occur in the absence of obstructive CAD. We assessed the lifetime cost-effectiveness of integrating a novel artificial intelligence-enhanced image analysis algorithm (AI-Risk) that stratifies the risk of cardiac events by quantifying coronary inflammation, combined with the extent of coronary artery plaque and clinical risk factors, by analysing images from routine CCTA.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A hybrid decision-tree with population cohort Markov model was developed from 3,393 consecutive patients who underwent routine CCTA for suspected obstructive CAD and followed up for major adverse cardiac events over a median(IQR) of 7.7(6.4-9.1) years. In a prospective real-world evaluation survey of 744 consecutive patients undergoing CCTA for chest pain investigation, the availability of AI-Risk assessment led to treatment initiation or intensification in 45% of patients. In a further prospective study of 1,214 consecutive patients with extensive guideline recommended cardiovascular risk profiling, AI-Risk stratification led to treatment initiation or intensification in 39% of patients beyond the current clinical guideline recommendations. Treatment guided by AI-Risk modelled over a lifetime horizon could lead to fewer cardiac events (relative reductions of 4%, 4%, 11%, and 12% for myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, heart failure and cardiac death, respectively). Implementing AI-Risk classification in routine interpretation of CCTA is highly likely to be cost-effective (Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio £1,371-3,244), both in scenarios of current guideline compliance or when applied only to patients without obstructive CAD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with standard care, the addition of AI-Risk assessment in routine CCTA interpretation is cost effective, by refining risk guided medical management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":4,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Energy Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Energy Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae085\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:冠状动脉计算机断层扫描(CCTA)是疑似阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者胸痛的一线检查方法。然而,许多急性心脏事件是在没有阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的情况下发生的。我们评估了整合新型人工智能增强图像分析算法(AI-Risk)的终生成本效益,该算法通过量化冠状动脉炎症,结合冠状动脉斑块范围和临床风险因素,对常规 CCTA 图像进行分析,从而对心脏事件风险进行分层:从连续接受常规 CCTA 检查的 3,393 名疑似阻塞性冠状动脉粥样硬化(CAD)患者中建立了混合决策树和人群队列马尔可夫模型,并对其进行了中位数(IQR)为 7.7(6.4-9.1)年的重大心脏不良事件随访。在一项对 744 名因胸痛接受 CCTA 检查的连续患者进行的前瞻性真实世界评估调查中,45% 的患者在接受 AI 风险评估后开始或加强了治疗。在另一项对 1214 名连续患者进行的前瞻性研究中,根据指南建议进行了广泛的心血管风险分析,AI-风险分层使 39% 的患者开始或加强了治疗,超出了当前临床指南的建议。在AI-风险模型的指导下进行终生治疗可减少心脏事件的发生(心肌梗死、缺血性中风、心力衰竭和心源性死亡的相对减少率分别为4%、4%、11%和12%)。在CCTA常规解读中实施AI-风险分类极有可能具有成本效益(增量成本效益比为1371-3244英镑),无论是在遵守现行指南的情况下,还是在仅适用于无阻塞性CAD患者的情况下:与标准治疗相比,在常规 CCTA 解释中增加 AI 风险评估,通过完善风险指导下的医疗管理,具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-effectiveness of a novel AI technology to quantify coronary inflammation and cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing routine Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.

Aims: Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) is a first line investigation for chest pain in patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). However, many acute cardiac events occur in the absence of obstructive CAD. We assessed the lifetime cost-effectiveness of integrating a novel artificial intelligence-enhanced image analysis algorithm (AI-Risk) that stratifies the risk of cardiac events by quantifying coronary inflammation, combined with the extent of coronary artery plaque and clinical risk factors, by analysing images from routine CCTA.

Methods and results: A hybrid decision-tree with population cohort Markov model was developed from 3,393 consecutive patients who underwent routine CCTA for suspected obstructive CAD and followed up for major adverse cardiac events over a median(IQR) of 7.7(6.4-9.1) years. In a prospective real-world evaluation survey of 744 consecutive patients undergoing CCTA for chest pain investigation, the availability of AI-Risk assessment led to treatment initiation or intensification in 45% of patients. In a further prospective study of 1,214 consecutive patients with extensive guideline recommended cardiovascular risk profiling, AI-Risk stratification led to treatment initiation or intensification in 39% of patients beyond the current clinical guideline recommendations. Treatment guided by AI-Risk modelled over a lifetime horizon could lead to fewer cardiac events (relative reductions of 4%, 4%, 11%, and 12% for myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, heart failure and cardiac death, respectively). Implementing AI-Risk classification in routine interpretation of CCTA is highly likely to be cost-effective (Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio £1,371-3,244), both in scenarios of current guideline compliance or when applied only to patients without obstructive CAD.

Conclusions: Compared with standard care, the addition of AI-Risk assessment in routine CCTA interpretation is cost effective, by refining risk guided medical management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Energy Materials
ACS Applied Energy Materials Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1368
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信