Heidi T May, Jeffrey L Anderson, Michael Butzner, Punag H Divanji, Joseph B Muhlestein
{"title":"入院后射血分数严重降低的心衰患者的临床经济负担:HF-RESTORE。","authors":"Heidi T May, Jeffrey L Anderson, Michael Butzner, Punag H Divanji, Joseph B Muhlestein","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An estimated two-thirds of heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) hospitalized in the United States have a severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <30%). Few studies have categorized patients according to their severity of left ventricular dysfunction beyond an LVEF of <30%.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Intermountain Health patients (≥18 years) with a primary HF diagnosis, more than or equal to 1 inpatient hospitalization with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF, a documented LVEF of <30%, and a B-type natriuretic peptide >100 pg/mL within 1 year of hospitalization were studied. Patients were stratified by LVEF levels (≤15%, 16-25%, and 26-29%) and evaluated for death, HF hospitalization, healthcare resource utilization, and medical costs. Overall, 2184 patients (mean age 64.2 ± 15.5 years, 72.5% male) were stratified by LVEF [≤15%, n = 468 (21.4%); 16-25%, n = 1399 (64.1%); and 26-29%, n = 317 (14.5%)]. Lower LVEF was associated with younger age, male sex, and fewer comorbidities. Although 1-year mortality differed significantly between LVEF stratifications, which remained after adjustment by risk factors [vs. LVEF 26-29% (referent): ≤15%, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.92, P < 0.0001; and 16-25%, HR = 1.42, P = 0.01], mortality was similar by 3 years. HF hospitalizations at 1 and 3 years were similar among LVEF groups. Total HF costs-driven by increased HF outpatient costs-were significantly higher among LVEF of ≤15%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with an LVEF of ≤15% had a modestly increased risk of 1-year mortality, as well as significantly higher total HF costs. Patients with HFrEF and a severely reduced LVEF continue to face an increased clinicoeconomic burden, and novel therapies to treat this unmet medical need are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"149-159"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinicoeconomic burden among heart failure patients with severely reduced ejection fraction after hospital admission: HF-RESTORE.\",\"authors\":\"Heidi T May, Jeffrey L Anderson, Michael Butzner, Punag H Divanji, Joseph B Muhlestein\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An estimated two-thirds of heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) hospitalized in the United States have a severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <30%). Few studies have categorized patients according to their severity of left ventricular dysfunction beyond an LVEF of <30%.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Intermountain Health patients (≥18 years) with a primary HF diagnosis, more than or equal to 1 inpatient hospitalization with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF, a documented LVEF of <30%, and a B-type natriuretic peptide >100 pg/mL within 1 year of hospitalization were studied. Patients were stratified by LVEF levels (≤15%, 16-25%, and 26-29%) and evaluated for death, HF hospitalization, healthcare resource utilization, and medical costs. Overall, 2184 patients (mean age 64.2 ± 15.5 years, 72.5% male) were stratified by LVEF [≤15%, n = 468 (21.4%); 16-25%, n = 1399 (64.1%); and 26-29%, n = 317 (14.5%)]. Lower LVEF was associated with younger age, male sex, and fewer comorbidities. Although 1-year mortality differed significantly between LVEF stratifications, which remained after adjustment by risk factors [vs. LVEF 26-29% (referent): ≤15%, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.92, P < 0.0001; and 16-25%, HR = 1.42, P = 0.01], mortality was similar by 3 years. HF hospitalizations at 1 and 3 years were similar among LVEF groups. Total HF costs-driven by increased HF outpatient costs-were significantly higher among LVEF of ≤15%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with an LVEF of ≤15% had a modestly increased risk of 1-year mortality, as well as significantly higher total HF costs. Patients with HFrEF and a severely reduced LVEF continue to face an increased clinicoeconomic burden, and novel therapies to treat this unmet medical need are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"149-159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae081\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinicoeconomic burden among heart failure patients with severely reduced ejection fraction after hospital admission: HF-RESTORE.
Background: An estimated two-thirds of heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) hospitalized in the United States have a severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <30%). Few studies have categorized patients according to their severity of left ventricular dysfunction beyond an LVEF of <30%.
Methods and results: Intermountain Health patients (≥18 years) with a primary HF diagnosis, more than or equal to 1 inpatient hospitalization with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF, a documented LVEF of <30%, and a B-type natriuretic peptide >100 pg/mL within 1 year of hospitalization were studied. Patients were stratified by LVEF levels (≤15%, 16-25%, and 26-29%) and evaluated for death, HF hospitalization, healthcare resource utilization, and medical costs. Overall, 2184 patients (mean age 64.2 ± 15.5 years, 72.5% male) were stratified by LVEF [≤15%, n = 468 (21.4%); 16-25%, n = 1399 (64.1%); and 26-29%, n = 317 (14.5%)]. Lower LVEF was associated with younger age, male sex, and fewer comorbidities. Although 1-year mortality differed significantly between LVEF stratifications, which remained after adjustment by risk factors [vs. LVEF 26-29% (referent): ≤15%, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.92, P < 0.0001; and 16-25%, HR = 1.42, P = 0.01], mortality was similar by 3 years. HF hospitalizations at 1 and 3 years were similar among LVEF groups. Total HF costs-driven by increased HF outpatient costs-were significantly higher among LVEF of ≤15%.
Conclusion: Patients with an LVEF of ≤15% had a modestly increased risk of 1-year mortality, as well as significantly higher total HF costs. Patients with HFrEF and a severely reduced LVEF continue to face an increased clinicoeconomic burden, and novel therapies to treat this unmet medical need are warranted.
期刊介绍:
European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.