炎症性肠病患者转用皮下注射英夫利西单抗与维妥珠单抗:一项前瞻性多中心研究

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1007/s10620-024-08631-2
Mariabeatrice Principi, Irene Vita Brescia, Elisa Stasi, Silvia Mazzuoli, Angela Maria D'Uggento, Elena Equatore, Ilaria Lacavalla, Alfredo Di Leo
{"title":"炎症性肠病患者转用皮下注射英夫利西单抗与维妥珠单抗:一项前瞻性多中心研究","authors":"Mariabeatrice Principi, Irene Vita Brescia, Elisa Stasi, Silvia Mazzuoli, Angela Maria D'Uggento, Elena Equatore, Ilaria Lacavalla, Alfredo Di Leo","doi":"10.1007/s10620-024-08631-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Transition from intravenous (IV) to subcutaneous (SC) administration is an option in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with Infliximab (IFX) or Vedolizumab (VDZ). The aim was to compare the adherence, the persistence in therapy, and quality of life (QoL) at baseline, at 6, at 12 months of SC IFX versus SC VDZ.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, observational, multicenter study on patients with IBD in treatment with IV IFX or VDZ who switched to SC. All patients investigated the QoL by the short IBD Questionnaire (sIBDQ) and the concerns and expectations by a 6-item survey. Any adverse events, local and systemic, were reported. Safety, concerns, and satisfaction were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and eight out of 93 patients were replaced, 51 to SC IFX and 42 to SC VDZ. The majority accepted the SC route. Persistence in therapy was similar between the two groups. The QoL improved after 6 months (p = 0.004), but at T12 both groups show a significant decline in QoL. SC administration has not caused any concern for patients. As safety, both groups reported a similar number of local reactions (IFX 19.60% vs VDZ 19.04%). In the IFX group were reported more systemic reactions (IFX 11.6% vs VDZ 7.14%) without the need for hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The transition from IV to SC administration is an appropriate and safe option for treatment with IFX or VDZ. It is very important to consider the patient's choice and preference. The SC administration led to a significant benefit in QoL, especially in the first 6 months of therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"4458-4466"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transition to Subcutaneous Infliximab vs Vedolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"Mariabeatrice Principi, Irene Vita Brescia, Elisa Stasi, Silvia Mazzuoli, Angela Maria D'Uggento, Elena Equatore, Ilaria Lacavalla, Alfredo Di Leo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10620-024-08631-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Transition from intravenous (IV) to subcutaneous (SC) administration is an option in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with Infliximab (IFX) or Vedolizumab (VDZ). The aim was to compare the adherence, the persistence in therapy, and quality of life (QoL) at baseline, at 6, at 12 months of SC IFX versus SC VDZ.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, observational, multicenter study on patients with IBD in treatment with IV IFX or VDZ who switched to SC. All patients investigated the QoL by the short IBD Questionnaire (sIBDQ) and the concerns and expectations by a 6-item survey. Any adverse events, local and systemic, were reported. Safety, concerns, and satisfaction were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and eight out of 93 patients were replaced, 51 to SC IFX and 42 to SC VDZ. The majority accepted the SC route. Persistence in therapy was similar between the two groups. The QoL improved after 6 months (p = 0.004), but at T12 both groups show a significant decline in QoL. SC administration has not caused any concern for patients. As safety, both groups reported a similar number of local reactions (IFX 19.60% vs VDZ 19.04%). In the IFX group were reported more systemic reactions (IFX 11.6% vs VDZ 7.14%) without the need for hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The transition from IV to SC administration is an appropriate and safe option for treatment with IFX or VDZ. It is very important to consider the patient's choice and preference. The SC administration led to a significant benefit in QoL, especially in the first 6 months of therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4458-4466\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08631-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08631-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:炎症性肠病(IBD)患者在使用英夫利西单抗(IFX)或维多珠单抗(VDZ)治疗时,可以选择从静脉注射(IV)过渡到皮下注射(SC)。该研究旨在比较IFX(SC)与VDZ(SC)在基线、6个月和12个月时的依从性、治疗的持续性和生活质量(QoL):这是一项前瞻性、观察性、多中心研究,研究对象是正在接受静脉注射 IFX 或 VDZ 治疗并转为 SC 治疗的 IBD 患者。所有患者都通过简短的 IBD 问卷(sIBDQ)调查了 QoL,并通过 6 个项目的调查调查了他们的担忧和期望。报告了任何局部和全身不良事件。对安全性、担忧和满意度进行了评估:93名患者中有18人被替换,其中51人被替换为皮下注射IFX,42人被替换为皮下注射VDZ。大多数患者接受了皮下注射途径。两组患者坚持治疗的情况相似。6 个月后,患者的生活质量有所改善(p = 0.004),但在 T12 期,两组患者的生活质量均显著下降。SC 给药并未引起患者的任何担忧。在安全性方面,两组报告的局部反应数量相似(IFX 19.60% vs VDZ 19.04%)。IFX组报告的全身反应较多(IFX 11.6% vs VDZ 7.14%),但无需住院治疗:结论:IFX 或 VDZ 的治疗从静脉给药过渡到皮下注射是一种适当而安全的选择。考虑患者的选择和偏好非常重要。静脉滴注能显著改善患者的生活质量,尤其是在治疗的前 6 个月。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transition to Subcutaneous Infliximab vs Vedolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Background and aims: Transition from intravenous (IV) to subcutaneous (SC) administration is an option in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with Infliximab (IFX) or Vedolizumab (VDZ). The aim was to compare the adherence, the persistence in therapy, and quality of life (QoL) at baseline, at 6, at 12 months of SC IFX versus SC VDZ.

Methods: This was a prospective, observational, multicenter study on patients with IBD in treatment with IV IFX or VDZ who switched to SC. All patients investigated the QoL by the short IBD Questionnaire (sIBDQ) and the concerns and expectations by a 6-item survey. Any adverse events, local and systemic, were reported. Safety, concerns, and satisfaction were evaluated.

Results: One hundred and eight out of 93 patients were replaced, 51 to SC IFX and 42 to SC VDZ. The majority accepted the SC route. Persistence in therapy was similar between the two groups. The QoL improved after 6 months (p = 0.004), but at T12 both groups show a significant decline in QoL. SC administration has not caused any concern for patients. As safety, both groups reported a similar number of local reactions (IFX 19.60% vs VDZ 19.04%). In the IFX group were reported more systemic reactions (IFX 11.6% vs VDZ 7.14%) without the need for hospitalization.

Conclusion: The transition from IV to SC administration is an appropriate and safe option for treatment with IFX or VDZ. It is very important to consider the patient's choice and preference. The SC administration led to a significant benefit in QoL, especially in the first 6 months of therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信