Anna R Spivak, Marianna Maspero, Rebecca Y Spivak, Jessica Sankovic, Stephanie Norman, Caitlyn Deckard, Scott R Steele, Tracy L Hull
{"title":"直肠脱垂修复术中切除直肠与腹侧网片直肠术后的生活质量、功能效果和复发。","authors":"Anna R Spivak, Marianna Maspero, Rebecca Y Spivak, Jessica Sankovic, Stephanie Norman, Caitlyn Deckard, Scott R Steele, Tracy L Hull","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resection rectopexy and ventral mesh rectopexy are widely accepted surgical options for the treatment of rectal prolapse, however reports on long-term recurrence rates and functional outcomes are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We compared quality of life, long-term functional outcomes and prolapse recurrence after resection rectopexy versus ventral mesh rectopexy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively collected rectal prolapse surgery database.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Patients who underwent resection rectopexy or ventral mesh rectopexy at our center between 2009 and 2016 were included.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Two hundred twenty patients were included, of which 208 (94%) female; 85 (39%) underwent resection rectopexy, 135 (61%) ventral mesh rectopexy.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes measure: </strong>Prolapse recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The resection rectopexy group was younger (median 52 vs 60 years old, p = 0.02) and had more open procedures (20% vs 9%, p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 110 (IQR 94 - 146) months for resection rectopexy and 113 (87 - 137) for ventral mesh rectopexy, recurrences occurred in 21 (26%) in the resection rectopexy and 50 (39%) in the ventral mesh rectopexy group (p = 0.041). Median time to recurrence was 44 (18 - 80) months in the resection rectopexy group and 28.5 (11 - 52.5) in the ventral mesh rectopexy group (p = 0.14). There were no differences in the recurrence rate for primary prolapses in resection rectopexy vs ventral mesh rectopexy. Recurrence rate for re-do prolapses was higher in the ventral mesh rectopexy group 63% at 10 years, versus 25% in resection rectopexy group (p = 0.006). Functional outcomes were similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Retrospective review, recall bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-term quality of life and functional outcomes after resection rectopexy and ventral mesh rectopexy were comparable. Ventral mesh rectopexy was associated with a higher prolapse recurrence rate after recurrent rectal prolapse repair. See Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Life, Functional Outcomes, and Recurrence After Resection Rectopexy Versus Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse Repair.\",\"authors\":\"Anna R Spivak, Marianna Maspero, Rebecca Y Spivak, Jessica Sankovic, Stephanie Norman, Caitlyn Deckard, Scott R Steele, Tracy L Hull\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resection rectopexy and ventral mesh rectopexy are widely accepted surgical options for the treatment of rectal prolapse, however reports on long-term recurrence rates and functional outcomes are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We compared quality of life, long-term functional outcomes and prolapse recurrence after resection rectopexy versus ventral mesh rectopexy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively collected rectal prolapse surgery database.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Patients who underwent resection rectopexy or ventral mesh rectopexy at our center between 2009 and 2016 were included.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Two hundred twenty patients were included, of which 208 (94%) female; 85 (39%) underwent resection rectopexy, 135 (61%) ventral mesh rectopexy.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes measure: </strong>Prolapse recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The resection rectopexy group was younger (median 52 vs 60 years old, p = 0.02) and had more open procedures (20% vs 9%, p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 110 (IQR 94 - 146) months for resection rectopexy and 113 (87 - 137) for ventral mesh rectopexy, recurrences occurred in 21 (26%) in the resection rectopexy and 50 (39%) in the ventral mesh rectopexy group (p = 0.041). Median time to recurrence was 44 (18 - 80) months in the resection rectopexy group and 28.5 (11 - 52.5) in the ventral mesh rectopexy group (p = 0.14). There were no differences in the recurrence rate for primary prolapses in resection rectopexy vs ventral mesh rectopexy. Recurrence rate for re-do prolapses was higher in the ventral mesh rectopexy group 63% at 10 years, versus 25% in resection rectopexy group (p = 0.006). Functional outcomes were similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Retrospective review, recall bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-term quality of life and functional outcomes after resection rectopexy and ventral mesh rectopexy were comparable. Ventral mesh rectopexy was associated with a higher prolapse recurrence rate after recurrent rectal prolapse repair. See Video Abstract.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003467\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003467","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quality of Life, Functional Outcomes, and Recurrence After Resection Rectopexy Versus Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse Repair.
Background: Resection rectopexy and ventral mesh rectopexy are widely accepted surgical options for the treatment of rectal prolapse, however reports on long-term recurrence rates and functional outcomes are lacking.
Objective: We compared quality of life, long-term functional outcomes and prolapse recurrence after resection rectopexy versus ventral mesh rectopexy.
Design: We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively collected rectal prolapse surgery database.
Settings: Patients who underwent resection rectopexy or ventral mesh rectopexy at our center between 2009 and 2016 were included.
Patients: Two hundred twenty patients were included, of which 208 (94%) female; 85 (39%) underwent resection rectopexy, 135 (61%) ventral mesh rectopexy.
Main outcomes measure: Prolapse recurrence.
Results: The resection rectopexy group was younger (median 52 vs 60 years old, p = 0.02) and had more open procedures (20% vs 9%, p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 110 (IQR 94 - 146) months for resection rectopexy and 113 (87 - 137) for ventral mesh rectopexy, recurrences occurred in 21 (26%) in the resection rectopexy and 50 (39%) in the ventral mesh rectopexy group (p = 0.041). Median time to recurrence was 44 (18 - 80) months in the resection rectopexy group and 28.5 (11 - 52.5) in the ventral mesh rectopexy group (p = 0.14). There were no differences in the recurrence rate for primary prolapses in resection rectopexy vs ventral mesh rectopexy. Recurrence rate for re-do prolapses was higher in the ventral mesh rectopexy group 63% at 10 years, versus 25% in resection rectopexy group (p = 0.006). Functional outcomes were similar between the two groups.
Limitations: Retrospective review, recall bias.
Conclusion: Long-term quality of life and functional outcomes after resection rectopexy and ventral mesh rectopexy were comparable. Ventral mesh rectopexy was associated with a higher prolapse recurrence rate after recurrent rectal prolapse repair. See Video Abstract.
期刊介绍:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (DCR) is the official journal of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) dedicated to advancing the knowledge of intestinal disorders by providing a forum for communication amongst their members. The journal features timely editorials, original contributions and technical notes.