针对老年人轻度认知障碍和痴呆症的计算机认知评估的最新进展:系统性综述。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cornelia Henkel, Susan Seibert, Catherine Nichols Widmann
{"title":"针对老年人轻度认知障碍和痴呆症的计算机认知评估的最新进展:系统性综述。","authors":"Cornelia Henkel, Susan Seibert, Catherine Nichols Widmann","doi":"10.1159/000541627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Timely detection of cognitive impairment such as mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia is pivotal in initiating early interventions to improve patients' quality of life. Conventional paper-pencil tests, though common, have limited sensitivity in detecting subtle cognitive changes. Computerised assessments offer promising alternatives, overcoming time and manual scoring constraints while potentially providing greater sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search yielded 26 eligible articles (2020-2023). The articles were reviewed according to PRISMA guidelines and the computerised tools were categorised by diagnostic outcome (MCI, dementia, combined).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The subjects included in the studies were aged 55 to 77 years. The overall gender distribution comprised 60% females and 40% males. The sample sizes varied considerably from 22 to 4486. Convergent validity assessments in 20 studies demonstrated strong positive correlations with traditional tests. Overall classification accuracy in detecting MCI or dementia, distinguishing from normal cognition (NC), reached up to 91%. Impressively, 46% of the studies received high-quality ratings, underscoring the reliability and validity of the findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The review highlights the advancements in computerised cognitive assessments for assessing MCI and dementia. This shift toward technology-based assessments could enhance detection capabilities and facilitate timely interventions for better patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Advances in Computerised Cognitive Assessment for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in Older Adults: A systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Cornelia Henkel, Susan Seibert, Catherine Nichols Widmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000541627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Timely detection of cognitive impairment such as mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia is pivotal in initiating early interventions to improve patients' quality of life. Conventional paper-pencil tests, though common, have limited sensitivity in detecting subtle cognitive changes. Computerised assessments offer promising alternatives, overcoming time and manual scoring constraints while potentially providing greater sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search yielded 26 eligible articles (2020-2023). The articles were reviewed according to PRISMA guidelines and the computerised tools were categorised by diagnostic outcome (MCI, dementia, combined).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The subjects included in the studies were aged 55 to 77 years. The overall gender distribution comprised 60% females and 40% males. The sample sizes varied considerably from 22 to 4486. Convergent validity assessments in 20 studies demonstrated strong positive correlations with traditional tests. Overall classification accuracy in detecting MCI or dementia, distinguishing from normal cognition (NC), reached up to 91%. Impressively, 46% of the studies received high-quality ratings, underscoring the reliability and validity of the findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The review highlights the advancements in computerised cognitive assessments for assessing MCI and dementia. This shift toward technology-based assessments could enhance detection capabilities and facilitate timely interventions for better patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541627\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541627","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介及时发现轻度认知功能障碍(MCI)或痴呆症等认知功能障碍,对于启动早期干预措施以改善患者的生活质量至关重要。传统的纸笔测试虽然常见,但在检测细微的认知变化方面灵敏度有限。计算机化评估克服了时间和人工评分的限制,同时可能提供更高的灵敏度,是一种很有前景的替代方法:方法:通过文献检索获得了 26 篇符合条件的文章(2020-2023 年)。根据PRISMA指南对这些文章进行了审查,并按照诊断结果(MCI、痴呆、合并)对计算机化工具进行了分类:研究对象的年龄在 55 岁至 77 岁之间。总体性别分布为女性占 60%,男性占 40%。样本量差别很大,从 22 个到 4486 个不等。20项研究的收敛有效性评估表明,该方法与传统测试具有很强的正相关性。在检测 MCI 或痴呆症以及区分正常认知(NC)方面,总体分类准确率高达 91%。令人印象深刻的是,46%的研究获得了高质量评级,这凸显了研究结果的可靠性和有效性:综述强调了用于评估 MCI 和痴呆症的计算机化认知评估的进步。向基于技术的评估转变可提高检测能力,促进及时干预,从而改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current Advances in Computerised Cognitive Assessment for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in Older Adults: A systematic Review.

Introduction: Timely detection of cognitive impairment such as mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia is pivotal in initiating early interventions to improve patients' quality of life. Conventional paper-pencil tests, though common, have limited sensitivity in detecting subtle cognitive changes. Computerised assessments offer promising alternatives, overcoming time and manual scoring constraints while potentially providing greater sensitivity.

Methods: A literature search yielded 26 eligible articles (2020-2023). The articles were reviewed according to PRISMA guidelines and the computerised tools were categorised by diagnostic outcome (MCI, dementia, combined).

Results: The subjects included in the studies were aged 55 to 77 years. The overall gender distribution comprised 60% females and 40% males. The sample sizes varied considerably from 22 to 4486. Convergent validity assessments in 20 studies demonstrated strong positive correlations with traditional tests. Overall classification accuracy in detecting MCI or dementia, distinguishing from normal cognition (NC), reached up to 91%. Impressively, 46% of the studies received high-quality ratings, underscoring the reliability and validity of the findings.

Conclusion: The review highlights the advancements in computerised cognitive assessments for assessing MCI and dementia. This shift toward technology-based assessments could enhance detection capabilities and facilitate timely interventions for better patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: As a unique forum devoted exclusively to the study of cognitive dysfunction, ''Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders'' concentrates on Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea and other neurodegenerative diseases. The journal draws from diverse related research disciplines such as psychogeriatrics, neuropsychology, clinical neurology, morphology, physiology, genetic molecular biology, pathology, biochemistry, immunology, pharmacology and pharmaceutics. Strong emphasis is placed on the publication of research findings from animal studies which are complemented by clinical and therapeutic experience to give an overall appreciation of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信