运动计划与饮食建议相结合对避免妊娠糖尿病妇女使用胰岛素的影响:随机对照试验。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Michel Boulvain, Véronique Othenin-Girard, François R Jornayvaz, Bengt Kayser
{"title":"运动计划与饮食建议相结合对避免妊娠糖尿病妇女使用胰岛素的影响:随机对照试验。","authors":"Michel Boulvain, Véronique Othenin-Girard, François R Jornayvaz, Bengt Kayser","doi":"10.1186/s13098-024-01470-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of an exercise intervention, in addition to standard care, in preventing or delaying insulin prescription in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University hospital.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Pregnant women at 25-35 weeks of gestation diagnosed with GDM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women in the intervention group participated in weekly, supervised, 30-45 min exercise sessions and were encouraged to accumulate more than 5000 steps per day, tracked by a pedometer, in addition to receiving usual care. The control group received standard care only.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Insulin prescription.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From February 2008 through April 2013, 109 women were randomized into the intervention group (n = 57) or the usual care group (n = 52). Two women in the intervention group were excluded from the analysis (one was randomised in error and one was lost to follow-up). Six women never attended the exercise sessions, and two attended fewer than two sessions. However, two-third of women were considered as compliant to the intervention (attended more than 50% of sessions and/or averaged more than 5000 steps/day). The incidence of insulin prescription did not differ between the groups: 31 women (56%) in the intervention group versus 24 women (46%) in the control group (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.78). The median time from randomization to insulin prescription was also similar between groups (14 days in the intervention group and 13 days in the control group).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study did not demonstrate that an exercise program reduces or delays insulin prescription in women with GDM. Low adherence to the intervention, a small sample size, and the short duration of the program may explain the lack of observed benefit.</p><p><strong>Registered: </strong>At clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03174340, 02/06/2017.</p>","PeriodicalId":11106,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","volume":"16 1","pages":"238"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440678/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of an exercise program combined with dietary advice on avoiding insulin prescription in women with gestational diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Michel Boulvain, Véronique Othenin-Girard, François R Jornayvaz, Bengt Kayser\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13098-024-01470-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of an exercise intervention, in addition to standard care, in preventing or delaying insulin prescription in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University hospital.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Pregnant women at 25-35 weeks of gestation diagnosed with GDM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women in the intervention group participated in weekly, supervised, 30-45 min exercise sessions and were encouraged to accumulate more than 5000 steps per day, tracked by a pedometer, in addition to receiving usual care. The control group received standard care only.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Insulin prescription.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From February 2008 through April 2013, 109 women were randomized into the intervention group (n = 57) or the usual care group (n = 52). Two women in the intervention group were excluded from the analysis (one was randomised in error and one was lost to follow-up). Six women never attended the exercise sessions, and two attended fewer than two sessions. However, two-third of women were considered as compliant to the intervention (attended more than 50% of sessions and/or averaged more than 5000 steps/day). The incidence of insulin prescription did not differ between the groups: 31 women (56%) in the intervention group versus 24 women (46%) in the control group (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.78). The median time from randomization to insulin prescription was also similar between groups (14 days in the intervention group and 13 days in the control group).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study did not demonstrate that an exercise program reduces or delays insulin prescription in women with GDM. Low adherence to the intervention, a small sample size, and the short duration of the program may explain the lack of observed benefit.</p><p><strong>Registered: </strong>At clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03174340, 02/06/2017.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440678/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-024-01470-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-024-01470-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估除标准护理外,运动干预对预防或延迟妊娠糖尿病(GDM)妇女使用胰岛素的有效性:随机对照试验:人群: 怀孕 25-35 周的孕妇方法:干预组的妇女每周参加一次胰岛素治疗:干预组的孕妇每周参加 30-45 分钟有监督的运动课程,除了接受常规护理外,还鼓励她们通过计步器记录每天累积的步数超过 5000 步。对照组只接受标准护理。主要结果指标:胰岛素处方:从 2008 年 2 月到 2013 年 4 月,109 名妇女被随机分为干预组(57 人)或常规护理组(52 人)。干预组中有两名妇女被排除在分析之外(一名被错误随机,一名失去随访)。六名妇女从未参加过运动课程,两名妇女参加的课程少于两次。不过,有三分之二的妇女被认为遵守了干预措施(参加了50%以上的课程和/或平均每天走5000步以上)。胰岛素处方的发生率在两组之间没有差异:干预组 31 名妇女(56%),对照组 24 名妇女(46%)(RR 1.22,95% CI 0.84 至 1.78)。各组从随机分配到开具胰岛素处方的中位时间也相似(干预组为 14 天,对照组为 13 天):本研究并未证明运动项目可减少或延迟 GDM 女性患者的胰岛素处方。干预的依从性低、样本量小以及计划持续时间短可能是缺乏观察到的益处的原因:在 clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03174340, 02/06/2017.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of an exercise program combined with dietary advice on avoiding insulin prescription in women with gestational diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of an exercise intervention, in addition to standard care, in preventing or delaying insulin prescription in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Setting: University hospital.

Population: Pregnant women at 25-35 weeks of gestation diagnosed with GDM.

Methods: Women in the intervention group participated in weekly, supervised, 30-45 min exercise sessions and were encouraged to accumulate more than 5000 steps per day, tracked by a pedometer, in addition to receiving usual care. The control group received standard care only.

Main outcome measure: Insulin prescription.

Results: From February 2008 through April 2013, 109 women were randomized into the intervention group (n = 57) or the usual care group (n = 52). Two women in the intervention group were excluded from the analysis (one was randomised in error and one was lost to follow-up). Six women never attended the exercise sessions, and two attended fewer than two sessions. However, two-third of women were considered as compliant to the intervention (attended more than 50% of sessions and/or averaged more than 5000 steps/day). The incidence of insulin prescription did not differ between the groups: 31 women (56%) in the intervention group versus 24 women (46%) in the control group (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.78). The median time from randomization to insulin prescription was also similar between groups (14 days in the intervention group and 13 days in the control group).

Conclusion: This study did not demonstrate that an exercise program reduces or delays insulin prescription in women with GDM. Low adherence to the intervention, a small sample size, and the short duration of the program may explain the lack of observed benefit.

Registered: At clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03174340, 02/06/2017.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome publishes articles on all aspects of the pathophysiology of diabetes and metabolic syndrome. By publishing original material exploring any area of laboratory, animal or clinical research into diabetes and metabolic syndrome, the journal offers a high-visibility forum for new insights and discussions into the issues of importance to the relevant community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信