生物制剂时代回肠直肠吻合术治疗克罗恩病的命运:法国一项回顾性多中心队列研究的结果。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Juba Ait Mohand, Arnaud Alves, Antoine Brouquet, Adeline Germain, Valerie Bridoux, Bertrand Trilling, Etienne Buscail, Caroline Valibouze, Maxime Leroy, Pierre Desreumaux, Philippe Zerbib
{"title":"生物制剂时代回肠直肠吻合术治疗克罗恩病的命运:法国一项回顾性多中心队列研究的结果。","authors":"Juba Ait Mohand,&nbsp;Arnaud Alves,&nbsp;Antoine Brouquet,&nbsp;Adeline Germain,&nbsp;Valerie Bridoux,&nbsp;Bertrand Trilling,&nbsp;Etienne Buscail,&nbsp;Caroline Valibouze,&nbsp;Maxime Leroy,&nbsp;Pierre Desreumaux,&nbsp;Philippe Zerbib","doi":"10.1111/codi.17185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The rate of surgical recurrence following ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) remains poorly understood. Most studies were conducted before the advent of biologics. Our aim was to assess the fate of IRA in patients with CD during the biologics era and identify risk factors for endoscopic, clinical, and surgical recurrence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective multicentre cohort study included patients with CD who underwent IRA between 2006 and 2022. The association of patient characteristics and postoperative measures with each type of postoperative recurrence and need for a definitive stoma was investigated using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>During a median follow-up period of 60 months, the rates of endoscopic, clinical, and surgical postoperative recurrence were 70%, 59%, and 35%, respectively. The rate of perianal lesions was higher in patients who underwent a definitive stoma (70% vs. 35%, <i>p</i> = 0.007) and with endoscopic (50% vs. 25%, <i>p</i> = 0.038), clinical (54% vs. 24%, <i>p</i> = 0.006), and surgical (63% vs. 34%, <i>p</i> = 0.015) recurrence. The incidence of residual microscopic disease at the rectal margin was higher in patients with endoscopic recurrence (<i>p</i> = 0.047). Biologics were identified as protective factors against the need for a definitive stoma (<i>p</i> = 0.044).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>IRA is a good treatment option for extensive colitis in patients with CD. However, its consideration should be weighed in the presence of perianal lesions, which have been shown to be a risk factor for delayed proctectomy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"26 11","pages":"1941-1949"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/codi.17185","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fate of ileorectal anastomosis for treating Crohn's disease in the era of biologics: Results from a French retrospective multicentre cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Juba Ait Mohand,&nbsp;Arnaud Alves,&nbsp;Antoine Brouquet,&nbsp;Adeline Germain,&nbsp;Valerie Bridoux,&nbsp;Bertrand Trilling,&nbsp;Etienne Buscail,&nbsp;Caroline Valibouze,&nbsp;Maxime Leroy,&nbsp;Pierre Desreumaux,&nbsp;Philippe Zerbib\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/codi.17185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>The rate of surgical recurrence following ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) remains poorly understood. Most studies were conducted before the advent of biologics. Our aim was to assess the fate of IRA in patients with CD during the biologics era and identify risk factors for endoscopic, clinical, and surgical recurrence.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This retrospective multicentre cohort study included patients with CD who underwent IRA between 2006 and 2022. The association of patient characteristics and postoperative measures with each type of postoperative recurrence and need for a definitive stoma was investigated using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>During a median follow-up period of 60 months, the rates of endoscopic, clinical, and surgical postoperative recurrence were 70%, 59%, and 35%, respectively. The rate of perianal lesions was higher in patients who underwent a definitive stoma (70% vs. 35%, <i>p</i> = 0.007) and with endoscopic (50% vs. 25%, <i>p</i> = 0.038), clinical (54% vs. 24%, <i>p</i> = 0.006), and surgical (63% vs. 34%, <i>p</i> = 0.015) recurrence. The incidence of residual microscopic disease at the rectal margin was higher in patients with endoscopic recurrence (<i>p</i> = 0.047). Biologics were identified as protective factors against the need for a definitive stoma (<i>p</i> = 0.044).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>IRA is a good treatment option for extensive colitis in patients with CD. However, its consideration should be weighed in the presence of perianal lesions, which have been shown to be a risk factor for delayed proctectomy.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Colorectal Disease\",\"volume\":\"26 11\",\"pages\":\"1941-1949\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/codi.17185\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Colorectal Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/codi.17185\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/codi.17185","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:人们对克罗恩病(CD)患者进行回肠直肠吻合术(IRA)后的手术复发率仍然知之甚少。大多数研究都是在生物制剂出现之前进行的。我们的目的是评估生物制剂时代克罗恩病患者IRA的命运,并确定内镜、临床和手术复发的风险因素:这项回顾性多中心队列研究纳入了 2006 年至 2022 年间接受过 IRA 的 CD 患者。采用卡方检验或费雪精确检验法研究了患者特征和术后措施与各类术后复发以及是否需要最终造口的关系:中位随访期为60个月,内镜、临床和手术术后复发率分别为70%、59%和35%。肛周病变率在接受明确造口术(70% 对 35%,P = 0.007)和内镜(50% 对 25%,P = 0.038)、临床(54% 对 24%,P = 0.006)和手术(63% 对 34%,P = 0.015)复发的患者中更高。内镜复发患者直肠边缘残留微小病变的发生率更高(p = 0.047)。生物制剂被认为是不需要最终造口的保护因素(p = 0.044):结论:IRA 是 CD 患者广泛性结肠炎的良好治疗选择。结论:IRA 是 CD 患者广泛性结肠炎的良好治疗选择,但应权衡是否存在肛周病变,因为肛周病变已被证明是直肠切除术延迟的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fate of ileorectal anastomosis for treating Crohn's disease in the era of biologics: Results from a French retrospective multicentre cohort study

Aim

The rate of surgical recurrence following ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) remains poorly understood. Most studies were conducted before the advent of biologics. Our aim was to assess the fate of IRA in patients with CD during the biologics era and identify risk factors for endoscopic, clinical, and surgical recurrence.

Methods

This retrospective multicentre cohort study included patients with CD who underwent IRA between 2006 and 2022. The association of patient characteristics and postoperative measures with each type of postoperative recurrence and need for a definitive stoma was investigated using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.

Results

During a median follow-up period of 60 months, the rates of endoscopic, clinical, and surgical postoperative recurrence were 70%, 59%, and 35%, respectively. The rate of perianal lesions was higher in patients who underwent a definitive stoma (70% vs. 35%, p = 0.007) and with endoscopic (50% vs. 25%, p = 0.038), clinical (54% vs. 24%, p = 0.006), and surgical (63% vs. 34%, p = 0.015) recurrence. The incidence of residual microscopic disease at the rectal margin was higher in patients with endoscopic recurrence (p = 0.047). Biologics were identified as protective factors against the need for a definitive stoma (p = 0.044).

Conclusion

IRA is a good treatment option for extensive colitis in patients with CD. However, its consideration should be weighed in the presence of perianal lesions, which have been shown to be a risk factor for delayed proctectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Colorectal Disease
Colorectal Disease 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
406
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Diseases of the colon and rectum are common and offer a number of exciting challenges. Clinical, diagnostic and basic science research is expanding rapidly. There is increasing demand from purchasers of health care and patients for clinicians to keep abreast of the latest research and developments, and to translate these into routine practice. Technological advances in diagnosis, surgical technique, new pharmaceuticals, molecular genetics and other basic sciences have transformed many aspects of how these diseases are managed. Such progress will accelerate. Colorectal Disease offers a real benefit to subscribers and authors. It is first and foremost a vehicle for publishing original research relating to the demanding, rapidly expanding field of colorectal diseases. Essential for surgeons, pathologists, oncologists, gastroenterologists and health professionals caring for patients with a disease of the lower GI tract, Colorectal Disease furthers education and inter-professional development by including regular review articles and discussions of current controversies. Note that the journal does not usually accept paediatric surgical papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信