利用机器学习预测疑似胃痉挛患者对神经调节剂或促动剂的反应:BMI、感染性前驱症状、延迟 GES 和无糖尿病 "模型。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Will Takakura, Brian Surjanhata, Linda Anh Bui Nguyen, Henry P Parkman, Satish S C Rao, Richard W McCallum, Michael Schulman, John Man-Ho Wo, Irene Sarosiek, Baha Moshiree, Braden Kuo, William L Hasler, Allen A Lee
{"title":"利用机器学习预测疑似胃痉挛患者对神经调节剂或促动剂的反应:BMI、感染性前驱症状、延迟 GES 和无糖尿病 \"模型。","authors":"Will Takakura, Brian Surjanhata, Linda Anh Bui Nguyen, Henry P Parkman, Satish S C Rao, Richard W McCallum, Michael Schulman, John Man-Ho Wo, Irene Sarosiek, Baha Moshiree, Braden Kuo, William L Hasler, Allen A Lee","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pharmacologic therapies for symptoms of gastroparesis (GP) have limited efficacy, and it is difficult to predict which patients will respond. In this study, we implemented a machine learning model to predict the response to prokinetics and/or neuromodulators in patients with GP-like symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects with suspected GP underwent simultaneous gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) and wireless motility capsule and were followed for 6 months. Subjects were included if they were started on neuromodulators and/or prokinetics. Subjects were considered responders if their GP Cardinal Symptom Index at 6 months decreased by ≥1 from baseline. A machine learning model was trained using lasso regression, ridge regression, or random forest. Five-fold cross-validation was used to train the models, and the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) was calculated using the test set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 150 patients enrolled, 123 patients received either a prokinetic and/or a neuromodulator. Of the 123, 45 were considered responders and 78 were nonresponders. A ridge regression model with the variables, such as body mass index, infectious prodrome, delayed gastric emptying scintigraphy, no diabetes, had the highest AUC-ROC of 0.72. The model performed well for subjects on prokinetics without neuromodulators (AUC-ROC of 0.83) but poorly for those on neuromodulators without prokinetics. A separate model with gastric emptying time, duodenal motility index, no diabetes, and functional dyspepsia performed better (AUC-ROC of 0.75).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This machine learning model has an acceptable accuracy in predicting those who will respond to neuromodulators and/or prokinetics. If validated, our model provides valuable data in predicting treatment outcomes in patients with GP-like symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":"15 9","pages":"e1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11421729/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Response to Neuromodulators or Prokinetics in Patients With Suspected Gastroparesis Using Machine Learning: The \\\"BMI, Infectious Prodrome, Delayed GES, and No Diabetes\\\" Model.\",\"authors\":\"Will Takakura, Brian Surjanhata, Linda Anh Bui Nguyen, Henry P Parkman, Satish S C Rao, Richard W McCallum, Michael Schulman, John Man-Ho Wo, Irene Sarosiek, Baha Moshiree, Braden Kuo, William L Hasler, Allen A Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pharmacologic therapies for symptoms of gastroparesis (GP) have limited efficacy, and it is difficult to predict which patients will respond. In this study, we implemented a machine learning model to predict the response to prokinetics and/or neuromodulators in patients with GP-like symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects with suspected GP underwent simultaneous gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) and wireless motility capsule and were followed for 6 months. Subjects were included if they were started on neuromodulators and/or prokinetics. Subjects were considered responders if their GP Cardinal Symptom Index at 6 months decreased by ≥1 from baseline. A machine learning model was trained using lasso regression, ridge regression, or random forest. Five-fold cross-validation was used to train the models, and the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) was calculated using the test set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 150 patients enrolled, 123 patients received either a prokinetic and/or a neuromodulator. Of the 123, 45 were considered responders and 78 were nonresponders. A ridge regression model with the variables, such as body mass index, infectious prodrome, delayed gastric emptying scintigraphy, no diabetes, had the highest AUC-ROC of 0.72. The model performed well for subjects on prokinetics without neuromodulators (AUC-ROC of 0.83) but poorly for those on neuromodulators without prokinetics. A separate model with gastric emptying time, duodenal motility index, no diabetes, and functional dyspepsia performed better (AUC-ROC of 0.75).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This machine learning model has an acceptable accuracy in predicting those who will respond to neuromodulators and/or prokinetics. If validated, our model provides valuable data in predicting treatment outcomes in patients with GP-like symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"15 9\",\"pages\":\"e1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11421729/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000743\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000743","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:针对胃轻瘫(GP)症状的药物疗法疗效有限,而且很难预测哪些患者会产生反应。在这项研究中,我们采用了一种机器学习模型来预测具有类似GP症状的患者对促动剂和/或神经调节剂的反应:方法:对疑似 GP 患者同时进行胃排空闪烁成像(GES)和无线运动胶囊检查,并随访 6 个月。如果受试者开始使用神经调节剂和/或促动力药,则将其纳入研究范围。如果受试者的 GP Cardinal 症状指数在 6 个月后比基线下降≥1,则视为应答者。使用套索回归、脊回归或随机森林训练机器学习模型。使用五倍交叉验证来训练模型,并使用测试集计算接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC-ROC):在入组的 150 名患者中,123 名患者接受了促激剂和/或神经调节剂治疗。在这 123 名患者中,45 人被认为是应答者,78 人是非应答者。包含体重指数、感染前驱症状、胃排空延迟闪烁扫描、无糖尿病等变量的脊回归模型的AUC-ROC最高,为0.72。该模型在使用促动力药但不使用神经调节剂的受试者中表现良好(AUC-ROC 为 0.83),但在使用神经调节剂但不使用促动力药的受试者中表现不佳。一个包含胃排空时间、十二指肠运动指数、无糖尿病和功能性消化不良的单独模型表现较好(AUC-ROC 为 0.75):该机器学习模型在预测对神经调节剂和/或促动力疗法有反应的患者方面具有可接受的准确性。如果得到验证,我们的模型将为预测GP样症状患者的治疗结果提供有价值的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting Response to Neuromodulators or Prokinetics in Patients With Suspected Gastroparesis Using Machine Learning: The "BMI, Infectious Prodrome, Delayed GES, and No Diabetes" Model.

Introduction: Pharmacologic therapies for symptoms of gastroparesis (GP) have limited efficacy, and it is difficult to predict which patients will respond. In this study, we implemented a machine learning model to predict the response to prokinetics and/or neuromodulators in patients with GP-like symptoms.

Methods: Subjects with suspected GP underwent simultaneous gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) and wireless motility capsule and were followed for 6 months. Subjects were included if they were started on neuromodulators and/or prokinetics. Subjects were considered responders if their GP Cardinal Symptom Index at 6 months decreased by ≥1 from baseline. A machine learning model was trained using lasso regression, ridge regression, or random forest. Five-fold cross-validation was used to train the models, and the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) was calculated using the test set.

Results: Of the 150 patients enrolled, 123 patients received either a prokinetic and/or a neuromodulator. Of the 123, 45 were considered responders and 78 were nonresponders. A ridge regression model with the variables, such as body mass index, infectious prodrome, delayed gastric emptying scintigraphy, no diabetes, had the highest AUC-ROC of 0.72. The model performed well for subjects on prokinetics without neuromodulators (AUC-ROC of 0.83) but poorly for those on neuromodulators without prokinetics. A separate model with gastric emptying time, duodenal motility index, no diabetes, and functional dyspepsia performed better (AUC-ROC of 0.75).

Discussion: This machine learning model has an acceptable accuracy in predicting those who will respond to neuromodulators and/or prokinetics. If validated, our model provides valuable data in predicting treatment outcomes in patients with GP-like symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology (CTG), published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), is a peer-reviewed open access online journal dedicated to innovative clinical work in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. CTG hopes to fulfill an unmet need for clinicians and scientists by welcoming novel cohort studies, early-phase clinical trials, qualitative and quantitative epidemiologic research, hypothesis-generating research, studies of novel mechanisms and methodologies including public health interventions, and integration of approaches across organs and disciplines. CTG also welcomes hypothesis-generating small studies, methods papers, and translational research with clear applications to human physiology or disease. Colon and small bowel Endoscopy and novel diagnostics Esophagus Functional GI disorders Immunology of the GI tract Microbiology of the GI tract Inflammatory bowel disease Pancreas and biliary tract Liver Pathology Pediatrics Preventative medicine Nutrition/obesity Stomach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信