自体软骨细胞移植的商业保险承保标准未能很好地反映当前的研究成果。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Jacob L Kotlier, Eric H Lin, Amir Fathi, Avinash S Iyer, Sahil S Telang, Ioanna K Bolia, Aamir Ahmad, Frank A Petrigliano, Joseph N Liu
{"title":"自体软骨细胞移植的商业保险承保标准未能很好地反映当前的研究成果。","authors":"Jacob L Kotlier, Eric H Lin, Amir Fathi, Avinash S Iyer, Sahil S Telang, Ioanna K Bolia, Aamir Ahmad, Frank A Petrigliano, Joseph N Liu","doi":"10.1177/19476035241276930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to both quantify and qualify the way insurance companies justify their coverage policies for autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and determine whether these policies align with recent research on the subject.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The top 11 national commercial health insurance payers for ACI were identified. Coverage policy documents were recovered for 8 payers. These documents were examined, and the type of reference and the level of evidence (LOE) were recorded for each applicable reference. Specific coverage criteria for each individual payer were then extracted and assessed for similarities among commercial payers. Finally, all references cited by each payer were examined to determine whether they mentioned the specific payer criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study found that the majority of cited references were primary journal articles (86, 58.1%) and that only 30 (20.2%) references were level I or level II evidence. This study also found significant homogeneity among payer coverage criteria. Cited sources inconsistently mentioned specific payer coverage criteria. In addition, payer criteria tended to be poorly supported by current evidence on ACI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that commercial insurance payers' coverage policies for ACI poorly cite references, cite a majority of references with low LOE, and cite references which infrequently mention their specific coverage criteria. In addition, payer coverage policies have a high degree of homogeneity and many of their specific criteria are poorly supported by current research on ACI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9626,"journal":{"name":"CARTILAGE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556559/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commercial Insurance Coverage Criteria for Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Poorly Reflect Current Research.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob L Kotlier, Eric H Lin, Amir Fathi, Avinash S Iyer, Sahil S Telang, Ioanna K Bolia, Aamir Ahmad, Frank A Petrigliano, Joseph N Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19476035241276930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to both quantify and qualify the way insurance companies justify their coverage policies for autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and determine whether these policies align with recent research on the subject.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The top 11 national commercial health insurance payers for ACI were identified. Coverage policy documents were recovered for 8 payers. These documents were examined, and the type of reference and the level of evidence (LOE) were recorded for each applicable reference. Specific coverage criteria for each individual payer were then extracted and assessed for similarities among commercial payers. Finally, all references cited by each payer were examined to determine whether they mentioned the specific payer criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study found that the majority of cited references were primary journal articles (86, 58.1%) and that only 30 (20.2%) references were level I or level II evidence. This study also found significant homogeneity among payer coverage criteria. Cited sources inconsistently mentioned specific payer coverage criteria. In addition, payer criteria tended to be poorly supported by current evidence on ACI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that commercial insurance payers' coverage policies for ACI poorly cite references, cite a majority of references with low LOE, and cite references which infrequently mention their specific coverage criteria. In addition, payer coverage policies have a high degree of homogeneity and many of their specific criteria are poorly supported by current research on ACI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CARTILAGE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556559/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CARTILAGE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19476035241276930\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CARTILAGE","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19476035241276930","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在对保险公司自体软骨细胞植入术(ACI)的承保政策进行量化和定性,并确定这些政策是否与近期的相关研究相一致:设计:确定了自体软骨细胞移植(ACI)的 11 家最大的全国性商业医疗保险支付方。设计:确定了 11 家支付 ACI 费用最多的全国性商业健康保险支付机构,并恢复了 8 家支付机构的承保政策文件。对这些文件进行了检查,并记录了每个适用参考文献的参考类型和证据级别 (LOE)。然后提取每个支付方的具体承保标准,并评估各商业支付方之间的相似性。最后,检查每个支付方引用的所有参考文献,以确定它们是否提到了特定的支付方标准:本研究发现,大部分被引用的参考文献都是主要期刊论文(86 篇,占 58.1%),只有 30 篇(20.2%)属于一级或二级证据。本研究还发现支付方覆盖标准之间存在明显的同质性。所引用的资料来源不一致地提到了具体的支付方覆盖标准。此外,支付方标准往往缺乏 ACI 现有证据的支持:本研究表明,商业保险支付方的 ACI 承保政策很少引用参考文献,引用的大多数参考文献 LOE 较低,而且引用的参考文献很少提及其特定的承保标准。此外,支付方的承保政策具有高度的同质性,而且其许多具体标准缺乏目前 ACI 研究的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Commercial Insurance Coverage Criteria for Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Poorly Reflect Current Research.

Objective: The aim of this study is to both quantify and qualify the way insurance companies justify their coverage policies for autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and determine whether these policies align with recent research on the subject.

Design: The top 11 national commercial health insurance payers for ACI were identified. Coverage policy documents were recovered for 8 payers. These documents were examined, and the type of reference and the level of evidence (LOE) were recorded for each applicable reference. Specific coverage criteria for each individual payer were then extracted and assessed for similarities among commercial payers. Finally, all references cited by each payer were examined to determine whether they mentioned the specific payer criteria.

Results: This study found that the majority of cited references were primary journal articles (86, 58.1%) and that only 30 (20.2%) references were level I or level II evidence. This study also found significant homogeneity among payer coverage criteria. Cited sources inconsistently mentioned specific payer coverage criteria. In addition, payer criteria tended to be poorly supported by current evidence on ACI.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that commercial insurance payers' coverage policies for ACI poorly cite references, cite a majority of references with low LOE, and cite references which infrequently mention their specific coverage criteria. In addition, payer coverage policies have a high degree of homogeneity and many of their specific criteria are poorly supported by current research on ACI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CARTILAGE
CARTILAGE ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: CARTILAGE publishes articles related to the musculoskeletal system with particular attention to cartilage repair, development, function, degeneration, transplantation, and rehabilitation. The journal is a forum for the exchange of ideas for the many types of researchers and clinicians involved in cartilage biology and repair. A primary objective of CARTILAGE is to foster the cross-fertilization of the findings between clinical and basic sciences throughout the various disciplines involved in cartilage repair. The journal publishes full length original manuscripts on all types of cartilage including articular, nasal, auricular, tracheal/bronchial, and intervertebral disc fibrocartilage. Manuscripts on clinical and laboratory research are welcome. Review articles, editorials, and letters are also encouraged. The ICRS envisages CARTILAGE as a forum for the exchange of knowledge among clinicians, scientists, patients, and researchers. The International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) is dedicated to promotion, encouragement, and distribution of fundamental and applied research of cartilage in order to permit a better knowledge of function and dysfunction of articular cartilage and its repair.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信