关于使用二恶烷作为参照物,通过核磁共振光谱测定流体力学半径。

IF 3.2 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
Emil E Tranchant, Francesco Pesce, Nina L Jacobsen, Catarina B Fernandes, Birthe B Kragelund, Kresten Lindorff-Larsen
{"title":"关于使用二恶烷作为参照物,通过核磁共振光谱测定流体力学半径。","authors":"Emil E Tranchant, Francesco Pesce, Nina L Jacobsen, Catarina B Fernandes, Birthe B Kragelund, Kresten Lindorff-Larsen","doi":"10.1016/j.bpj.2024.09.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measuring the compaction of a protein or complex is key to our understanding of the interactions within and between biomolecules. Experimentally, protein compaction is often probed either by estimating the radius of gyration (R<sub>g</sub>) obtained from small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) experiments or the hydrodynamic radius (R<sub>h</sub>) obtained, for example, by pulsed field gradient NMR (PFG NMR) spectroscopy. PFG NMR experiments generally report on the translational diffusion coefficient, which in turn can be used to estimate R<sub>h</sub> using an internal standard to account for sample viscosity and uncertainty about the gradient strength. 1,4-Dioxane is one such commonly used internal standard, and the reference value of R<sub>h</sub> is therefore important. We have revisited the basis for the commonly used reference value for the R<sub>h</sub> of dioxane (2.12 Å) that is used to convert measured diffusion coefficients into a hydrodynamic radius. We followed the same approach that was used to establish the current reference value by measuring SAXS and PFG NMR data for a set of seven different proteins and using these as standards. Our analysis shows that the current R<sub>h</sub> reference value for dioxane R<sub>h</sub> is underestimated, and we instead suggest a new value of 2.27 ± 0.04 Å. Using this updated reference value results in a ∼7% increase in R<sub>h</sub> values for proteins whose hydrodynamic radii have been measured by PFG NMR. These results are particularly important when the absolute value of R<sub>h</sub> is of interest such as when determining or validating ensemble descriptions of intrinsically disordered proteins.</p>","PeriodicalId":8922,"journal":{"name":"Biophysical journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the use of dioxane as reference for determination of the hydrodynamic radius by NMR spectroscopy.\",\"authors\":\"Emil E Tranchant, Francesco Pesce, Nina L Jacobsen, Catarina B Fernandes, Birthe B Kragelund, Kresten Lindorff-Larsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bpj.2024.09.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Measuring the compaction of a protein or complex is key to our understanding of the interactions within and between biomolecules. Experimentally, protein compaction is often probed either by estimating the radius of gyration (R<sub>g</sub>) obtained from small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) experiments or the hydrodynamic radius (R<sub>h</sub>) obtained, for example, by pulsed field gradient NMR (PFG NMR) spectroscopy. PFG NMR experiments generally report on the translational diffusion coefficient, which in turn can be used to estimate R<sub>h</sub> using an internal standard to account for sample viscosity and uncertainty about the gradient strength. 1,4-Dioxane is one such commonly used internal standard, and the reference value of R<sub>h</sub> is therefore important. We have revisited the basis for the commonly used reference value for the R<sub>h</sub> of dioxane (2.12 Å) that is used to convert measured diffusion coefficients into a hydrodynamic radius. We followed the same approach that was used to establish the current reference value by measuring SAXS and PFG NMR data for a set of seven different proteins and using these as standards. Our analysis shows that the current R<sub>h</sub> reference value for dioxane R<sub>h</sub> is underestimated, and we instead suggest a new value of 2.27 ± 0.04 Å. Using this updated reference value results in a ∼7% increase in R<sub>h</sub> values for proteins whose hydrodynamic radii have been measured by PFG NMR. These results are particularly important when the absolute value of R<sub>h</sub> is of interest such as when determining or validating ensemble descriptions of intrinsically disordered proteins.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biophysical journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biophysical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2024.09.025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysical journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2024.09.025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

测量蛋白质或复合物的压实度是我们了解生物大分子内部和之间相互作用的关键。在实验中,通常通过估算小角 X 射线散射(SAXS)实验获得的回旋半径(Rg)或脉冲场梯度核磁共振(PFG NMR)光谱等获得的流体力学半径(Rh)来探测蛋白质的压实度。脉冲场梯度核磁共振实验通常报告平移扩散系数,而平移扩散系数又可用于使用内标估算 Rh,以考虑样品粘度和梯度强度的不确定性。1,4-二氧六环就是一种常用的内标,因此 Rh 的参考值非常重要。我们重新研究了常用的二氧六环 Rh 参考值(2.12 Å)的基础,该参考值用于将测得的扩散系数转换为流体力学半径。我们采用了与确定当前参考值相同的方法,测量了一组七种不同蛋白质的 SAXS 和 PFG NMR 数据,并以这些数据为标准。我们的分析表明,二恶烷 Rh 的当前 Rh 参考值被低估了,因此我们提出了 2.27 Å ± 0.04 Å 的新值。使用这一更新的参考值可使通过 PFG NMR 测量了流体力学半径的蛋白质的 Rh 值增加 ∼ 7%。当 Rh 的绝对值受到关注时,例如在确定或验证内在无序蛋白质的集合描述时,这些结果尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the use of dioxane as reference for determination of the hydrodynamic radius by NMR spectroscopy.

Measuring the compaction of a protein or complex is key to our understanding of the interactions within and between biomolecules. Experimentally, protein compaction is often probed either by estimating the radius of gyration (Rg) obtained from small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) experiments or the hydrodynamic radius (Rh) obtained, for example, by pulsed field gradient NMR (PFG NMR) spectroscopy. PFG NMR experiments generally report on the translational diffusion coefficient, which in turn can be used to estimate Rh using an internal standard to account for sample viscosity and uncertainty about the gradient strength. 1,4-Dioxane is one such commonly used internal standard, and the reference value of Rh is therefore important. We have revisited the basis for the commonly used reference value for the Rh of dioxane (2.12 Å) that is used to convert measured diffusion coefficients into a hydrodynamic radius. We followed the same approach that was used to establish the current reference value by measuring SAXS and PFG NMR data for a set of seven different proteins and using these as standards. Our analysis shows that the current Rh reference value for dioxane Rh is underestimated, and we instead suggest a new value of 2.27 ± 0.04 Å. Using this updated reference value results in a ∼7% increase in Rh values for proteins whose hydrodynamic radii have been measured by PFG NMR. These results are particularly important when the absolute value of Rh is of interest such as when determining or validating ensemble descriptions of intrinsically disordered proteins.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biophysical journal
Biophysical journal 生物-生物物理
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
3090
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: BJ publishes original articles, letters, and perspectives on important problems in modern biophysics. The papers should be written so as to be of interest to a broad community of biophysicists. BJ welcomes experimental studies that employ quantitative physical approaches for the study of biological systems, including or spanning scales from molecule to whole organism. Experimental studies of a purely descriptive or phenomenological nature, with no theoretical or mechanistic underpinning, are not appropriate for publication in BJ. Theoretical studies should offer new insights into the understanding ofexperimental results or suggest new experimentally testable hypotheses. Articles reporting significant methodological or technological advances, which have potential to open new areas of biophysical investigation, are also suitable for publication in BJ. Papers describing improvements in accuracy or speed of existing methods or extra detail within methods described previously are not suitable for BJ.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信