在啮齿动物水迷宫范例的虚拟改编中评估社区生活老年人的快速空间工作记忆能力

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Eileen H.J. Wang , Frank H.Y. Lai , Wing Man Leung , Tsz Yan Shiu , Hiuyan Wong , Yingxia Tao , Xinlei Zhao , Tina Y.T. Zhang , Benjamin K. Yee
{"title":"在啮齿动物水迷宫范例的虚拟改编中评估社区生活老年人的快速空间工作记忆能力","authors":"Eileen H.J. Wang ,&nbsp;Frank H.Y. Lai ,&nbsp;Wing Man Leung ,&nbsp;Tsz Yan Shiu ,&nbsp;Hiuyan Wong ,&nbsp;Yingxia Tao ,&nbsp;Xinlei Zhao ,&nbsp;Tina Y.T. Zhang ,&nbsp;Benjamin K. Yee","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aging often leads to a decline in various cognitive domains, potentially contributing to spatial navigation challenges among older individuals. While the Morris water maze is a common tool in rodents research for evaluating allocentric spatial memory function, its translation to studying aging in humans, particularly its association with hippocampal dysfunction, has predominantly focused on spatial reference memory assessments. This study expanded the adaptation of the Morris water maze for older adults to assess flexible, rapid, one-trial working memory. This adaptation involved a spatial search task guided by allocentric cues within a 3-D virtual reality (VR) environment. The sensitivity of this approach to aging was examined in 146 community-living adults from three Chinese cities, categorized into three age groups. Significant performance deficits were observed in participants over 60 years old compared to younger adults aged between 18 and 43. However, interpreting these findings was complicated by factors such as psychomotor slowness and potential variations in task engagement, except during the probe tests. Notably, the transition from the 60 s to the 70 s was not associated with a substantial deterioration of performance. A distinction only emerged when the pattern of spatial search over the entire maze was examined in the probe tests when the target location was never revealed. The VR task's sensitivity to overall cognitive function in older adults was reinforced by the correlation between Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores and probe test performance, demonstrating up to 17 % shared variance beyond that predicted by chronological age alone. In conclusion, while implementing a VR-based adaptation of rodent water maze paradigms in older adults was feasible, our experience highlighted specific interpretative challenges that must be addressed before such a test can effectively supplement traditional cognitive assessment tools in evaluating age-related cognitive decline.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing rapid spatial working memory in community-living older adults in a virtual adaptation of the rodent water maze paradigm\",\"authors\":\"Eileen H.J. Wang ,&nbsp;Frank H.Y. Lai ,&nbsp;Wing Man Leung ,&nbsp;Tsz Yan Shiu ,&nbsp;Hiuyan Wong ,&nbsp;Yingxia Tao ,&nbsp;Xinlei Zhao ,&nbsp;Tina Y.T. Zhang ,&nbsp;Benjamin K. Yee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Aging often leads to a decline in various cognitive domains, potentially contributing to spatial navigation challenges among older individuals. While the Morris water maze is a common tool in rodents research for evaluating allocentric spatial memory function, its translation to studying aging in humans, particularly its association with hippocampal dysfunction, has predominantly focused on spatial reference memory assessments. This study expanded the adaptation of the Morris water maze for older adults to assess flexible, rapid, one-trial working memory. This adaptation involved a spatial search task guided by allocentric cues within a 3-D virtual reality (VR) environment. The sensitivity of this approach to aging was examined in 146 community-living adults from three Chinese cities, categorized into three age groups. Significant performance deficits were observed in participants over 60 years old compared to younger adults aged between 18 and 43. However, interpreting these findings was complicated by factors such as psychomotor slowness and potential variations in task engagement, except during the probe tests. Notably, the transition from the 60 s to the 70 s was not associated with a substantial deterioration of performance. A distinction only emerged when the pattern of spatial search over the entire maze was examined in the probe tests when the target location was never revealed. The VR task's sensitivity to overall cognitive function in older adults was reinforced by the correlation between Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores and probe test performance, demonstrating up to 17 % shared variance beyond that predicted by chronological age alone. In conclusion, while implementing a VR-based adaptation of rodent water maze paradigms in older adults was feasible, our experience highlighted specific interpretative challenges that must be addressed before such a test can effectively supplement traditional cognitive assessment tools in evaluating age-related cognitive decline.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioural Brain Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioural Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432824004224\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432824004224","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

衰老往往会导致各种认知领域的功能下降,这可能是老年人面临空间导航挑战的原因之一。虽然莫里斯水迷宫是啮齿类动物研究中评估分配中心空间记忆功能的常用工具,但将其应用于研究人类衰老,特别是其与海马功能障碍的关联,主要侧重于空间参照记忆评估。本研究扩大了莫里斯水迷宫对老年人的适应性,以评估灵活、快速、一试工作记忆。这种调整涉及在三维虚拟现实(VR)环境中以分配中心线索为指导的空间搜索任务。来自中国三个城市的 146 名社区生活成年人被分为三个年龄组,对这种方法的老龄化敏感性进行了研究。与年龄在 18 至 43 岁之间的年轻人相比,60 岁以上的参与者表现出明显的缺陷。然而,除了探究测试外,心理运动迟缓和任务参与度的潜在变化等因素使解释这些结果变得复杂。值得注意的是,从 60 多岁到 70 多岁的转变与成绩的大幅下降无关。只有在探究测试中对整个迷宫的空间搜索模式进行检查时,当目标位置从未被揭示时,才会出现差异。蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)得分与探究测试成绩之间的相关性加强了 VR 任务对老年人整体认知功能的敏感性,显示出多达 17% 的共同差异,超出了仅由年代年龄预测的水平。总之,虽然在老年人中实施基于 VR 的啮齿动物水迷宫范例改编是可行的,但我们的经验凸显了在此类测试有效补充传统认知评估工具以评估与年龄相关的认知衰退之前必须解决的特定解释性挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing rapid spatial working memory in community-living older adults in a virtual adaptation of the rodent water maze paradigm
Aging often leads to a decline in various cognitive domains, potentially contributing to spatial navigation challenges among older individuals. While the Morris water maze is a common tool in rodents research for evaluating allocentric spatial memory function, its translation to studying aging in humans, particularly its association with hippocampal dysfunction, has predominantly focused on spatial reference memory assessments. This study expanded the adaptation of the Morris water maze for older adults to assess flexible, rapid, one-trial working memory. This adaptation involved a spatial search task guided by allocentric cues within a 3-D virtual reality (VR) environment. The sensitivity of this approach to aging was examined in 146 community-living adults from three Chinese cities, categorized into three age groups. Significant performance deficits were observed in participants over 60 years old compared to younger adults aged between 18 and 43. However, interpreting these findings was complicated by factors such as psychomotor slowness and potential variations in task engagement, except during the probe tests. Notably, the transition from the 60 s to the 70 s was not associated with a substantial deterioration of performance. A distinction only emerged when the pattern of spatial search over the entire maze was examined in the probe tests when the target location was never revealed. The VR task's sensitivity to overall cognitive function in older adults was reinforced by the correlation between Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores and probe test performance, demonstrating up to 17 % shared variance beyond that predicted by chronological age alone. In conclusion, while implementing a VR-based adaptation of rodent water maze paradigms in older adults was feasible, our experience highlighted specific interpretative challenges that must be addressed before such a test can effectively supplement traditional cognitive assessment tools in evaluating age-related cognitive decline.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Brain Research
Behavioural Brain Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
383
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信