卵巢储备并不影响自然受孕:不孕妇女的启示。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Giulia Galati, Marco Reschini, Alessandra Chine’, Laura Benaglia, Paola Vigano’, Edgardo Somigliana, Paolo Vercellini, Ludovico Muzii
{"title":"卵巢储备并不影响自然受孕:不孕妇女的启示。","authors":"Giulia Galati,&nbsp;Marco Reschini,&nbsp;Alessandra Chine’,&nbsp;Laura Benaglia,&nbsp;Paola Vigano’,&nbsp;Edgardo Somigliana,&nbsp;Paolo Vercellini,&nbsp;Ludovico Muzii","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07741-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>There is several albeit not univocal evidence suggesting that ovarian reserve is not related to the chance of natural pregnancy, provided that the remnant follicular pool is sufficient to ensure regular menstrual cycles. Nevertheless, available studies have some methodological limitations, and the issue cannot be considered definitively ascertained.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>To further address this issue, we retrospectively selected infertile women whose infertility diagnostic work-up was unremarkable (unexplained infertility-cases) and matched them by age and study period to a group of infertile women who were diagnosed with severe male infertility (controls). If ovarian reserve impacts on natural fertility, one had to expect lower ovarian reserve among women with unexplained infertility. Tested biomarkers included AMH, AFC and day 2–3 serum FSH. The primary aim was the frequency of women with serum AMH &lt; 0.7 ng/ml.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Two-hundred fifty-two women with unexplained infertility and 252 women with male infertility were included. All biomarkers of ovarian reserve did not differ between the study groups. AMH levels &lt; 0.7 ng/mL were observed in 26 (10%) women with unexplained infertility and 35 (14%) women with male infertility (<i>p</i> = 0.28). The adjusted OR was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.44–1.33). Significant differences did not also emerge when repeating this dichotomous analysis using other biomarkers and other thresholds for the definition of low-ovarian reserve.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study confirms that ovarian reserve is unremarkable to natural conception. Physicians and patients should be aware of this concept to avoid inappropriate counseling and undue clinical decisions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":"310 5","pages":"2691 - 2696"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-024-07741-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ovarian reserve does not influence natural conception: insights from infertile women\",\"authors\":\"Giulia Galati,&nbsp;Marco Reschini,&nbsp;Alessandra Chine’,&nbsp;Laura Benaglia,&nbsp;Paola Vigano’,&nbsp;Edgardo Somigliana,&nbsp;Paolo Vercellini,&nbsp;Ludovico Muzii\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00404-024-07741-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>There is several albeit not univocal evidence suggesting that ovarian reserve is not related to the chance of natural pregnancy, provided that the remnant follicular pool is sufficient to ensure regular menstrual cycles. Nevertheless, available studies have some methodological limitations, and the issue cannot be considered definitively ascertained.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>To further address this issue, we retrospectively selected infertile women whose infertility diagnostic work-up was unremarkable (unexplained infertility-cases) and matched them by age and study period to a group of infertile women who were diagnosed with severe male infertility (controls). If ovarian reserve impacts on natural fertility, one had to expect lower ovarian reserve among women with unexplained infertility. Tested biomarkers included AMH, AFC and day 2–3 serum FSH. The primary aim was the frequency of women with serum AMH &lt; 0.7 ng/ml.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Two-hundred fifty-two women with unexplained infertility and 252 women with male infertility were included. All biomarkers of ovarian reserve did not differ between the study groups. AMH levels &lt; 0.7 ng/mL were observed in 26 (10%) women with unexplained infertility and 35 (14%) women with male infertility (<i>p</i> = 0.28). The adjusted OR was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.44–1.33). Significant differences did not also emerge when repeating this dichotomous analysis using other biomarkers and other thresholds for the definition of low-ovarian reserve.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study confirms that ovarian reserve is unremarkable to natural conception. Physicians and patients should be aware of this concept to avoid inappropriate counseling and undue clinical decisions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\"310 5\",\"pages\":\"2691 - 2696\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-024-07741-6.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-024-07741-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-024-07741-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:有一些证据表明,卵巢储备与自然怀孕的几率无关,但前提是剩余卵泡库足以确保月经周期规律。然而,现有的研究在方法上存在一定的局限性,因此这一问题还不能被认为是明确的:为了进一步解决这一问题,我们回顾性地选择了不孕症诊断结果无异常的不孕妇女(不明原因不孕症病例),并按年龄和研究时期将她们与一组被诊断为严重男性不育症的不孕妇女(对照组)进行配对。如果卵巢储备对自然生育力有影响,那么我们就必须预期不明原因不孕妇女的卵巢储备较低。测试的生物标志物包括AMH、AFC和第2-3天血清FSH。主要目的是检测血清 AMH 的女性频率:共纳入 252 名不明原因不孕症妇女和 252 名男性不育症妇女。研究组之间卵巢储备的所有生物标志物均无差异。AMH水平 结论:这项研究证实,卵巢储备功能对自然受孕没有显著影响。医生和患者应了解这一概念,以避免不恰当的咨询和不当的临床决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ovarian reserve does not influence natural conception: insights from infertile women

Purpose

There is several albeit not univocal evidence suggesting that ovarian reserve is not related to the chance of natural pregnancy, provided that the remnant follicular pool is sufficient to ensure regular menstrual cycles. Nevertheless, available studies have some methodological limitations, and the issue cannot be considered definitively ascertained.

Methods

To further address this issue, we retrospectively selected infertile women whose infertility diagnostic work-up was unremarkable (unexplained infertility-cases) and matched them by age and study period to a group of infertile women who were diagnosed with severe male infertility (controls). If ovarian reserve impacts on natural fertility, one had to expect lower ovarian reserve among women with unexplained infertility. Tested biomarkers included AMH, AFC and day 2–3 serum FSH. The primary aim was the frequency of women with serum AMH < 0.7 ng/ml.

Results

Two-hundred fifty-two women with unexplained infertility and 252 women with male infertility were included. All biomarkers of ovarian reserve did not differ between the study groups. AMH levels < 0.7 ng/mL were observed in 26 (10%) women with unexplained infertility and 35 (14%) women with male infertility (p = 0.28). The adjusted OR was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.44–1.33). Significant differences did not also emerge when repeating this dichotomous analysis using other biomarkers and other thresholds for the definition of low-ovarian reserve.

Conclusion

This study confirms that ovarian reserve is unremarkable to natural conception. Physicians and patients should be aware of this concept to avoid inappropriate counseling and undue clinical decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信