A comprehensive diagnostic approach to differentiate intrauterine arteriovenous malformation in cases of enhanced myometrial vascularity

Purpose

The differentiation between conditions such as uterine arteriovenous malformation, pseudoaneurysm, gestational trophoblastic disease, and retained trophoblastic tissue can be challenging. Ultrasound imaging and Doppler interrogation are the primary diagnostic tools to assess cases of enhanced myometrial vascularity and differentiate intrauterine vascular anomalies. However, some cases remain of difficult differentiation. This study aims to analyze suspected cases and describe their diagnostic management and outcomes.

Methods

We reviewed post-abortion cases that underwent pelvic transvaginal U/S imaging and Doppler examinations due to suspected uterine vascular anomalies. CT scans were performed in cases in which ultrasound did not reach a diagnosis. Simple follow-up, medical or surgical therapy, or embolization of uterine arteries were performed according to the final diagnosis.

Results

From 2015 to 2022, we retrieved from electronic ultrasound records 22 cases of suspected vascular malformations. In eight cases, first-line U/S at admission excluded the suspected anomaly. In Five of the remaining 14 patients, uterine vascular anomalies were excluded upon a second-level  U/S based on angio-Doppler imaging and Doppler peak velocity interrogation. Nine cases underwent CT scan, and a digital angiography and embolization were performed in eight of these cases, of whom only two had a documented uterine arteriovenous malformation.

Conclusion

Our triage proved that only two out of 22 suspected cases had a uterine arteriovenous malformation. This diagnosis is frequently misused in clinical practice. Our data confirm that enhanced myometrial vascularity should be used to encompass the spectrum of possible differential diagnosis. A precise step-by-step diagnostic method is of paramount importance to prevent unnecessary interventions.