Raj Chovatiya, Meredith T. Polaskey, Lakshi Aldredge, Candrice Heath, Moises Acevedo, David H. Chu, Diane Hanna, Melissa S. Seal, Matthew Zirwas
{"title":"美国患者和医护人员对脂溢性皮炎诊断途径的看法。","authors":"Raj Chovatiya, Meredith T. Polaskey, Lakshi Aldredge, Candrice Heath, Moises Acevedo, David H. Chu, Diane Hanna, Melissa S. Seal, Matthew Zirwas","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-02986-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Seborrheic dermatitis (SD) is a common, chronic inflammatory skin condition associated with significant impact on quality of life, yet its etiology and pathophysiology are not well understood. With significant impact on patients’ quality of life, understanding the diagnostic pathway from the perspectives of patient and healthcare providers (HCPs) is crucial.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>An online survey was developed and administered in conjunction with the Harris Poll to gain insight into patient and HCP perspectives about SD diagnosis and management from December 2021 to January 2022.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Most patients were unaware of SD before their diagnosis (71%) and experienced difficulty finding information online (56%). Patients delayed seeking medical attention for SD by an average of 3.6 years, with most patients feeling their symptoms did not require medical attention (63%), a perception that HCPs correctly anticipated. Additionally, most patients (58%) reported embarrassment discussing their SD symptoms with HCPs, a factor HCPs underestimated. HCPs also underestimated the percentage of patients self-reporting moderate-severity SD. Patients preferred dermatology HCPs for SD treatment (79%), and reported visiting an average of 2.3 different HCPs, with 75% of patients seeing more than one provider.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These insights highlight the complexities in the diagnostic and management pathways of SD and underscore the need for a more nuanced understanding and approach in addressing the condition.</p><p>Infographic available for this article.</p><h3>Infographic</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"41 12","pages":"4433 - 4445"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-024-02986-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient and Healthcare Provider Perspectives on the Pathway to Diagnosis of Seborrheic Dermatitis in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Raj Chovatiya, Meredith T. Polaskey, Lakshi Aldredge, Candrice Heath, Moises Acevedo, David H. Chu, Diane Hanna, Melissa S. Seal, Matthew Zirwas\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12325-024-02986-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Seborrheic dermatitis (SD) is a common, chronic inflammatory skin condition associated with significant impact on quality of life, yet its etiology and pathophysiology are not well understood. With significant impact on patients’ quality of life, understanding the diagnostic pathway from the perspectives of patient and healthcare providers (HCPs) is crucial.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>An online survey was developed and administered in conjunction with the Harris Poll to gain insight into patient and HCP perspectives about SD diagnosis and management from December 2021 to January 2022.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Most patients were unaware of SD before their diagnosis (71%) and experienced difficulty finding information online (56%). Patients delayed seeking medical attention for SD by an average of 3.6 years, with most patients feeling their symptoms did not require medical attention (63%), a perception that HCPs correctly anticipated. Additionally, most patients (58%) reported embarrassment discussing their SD symptoms with HCPs, a factor HCPs underestimated. HCPs also underestimated the percentage of patients self-reporting moderate-severity SD. Patients preferred dermatology HCPs for SD treatment (79%), and reported visiting an average of 2.3 different HCPs, with 75% of patients seeing more than one provider.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These insights highlight the complexities in the diagnostic and management pathways of SD and underscore the need for a more nuanced understanding and approach in addressing the condition.</p><p>Infographic available for this article.</p><h3>Infographic</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"volume\":\"41 12\",\"pages\":\"4433 - 4445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-024-02986-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-02986-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-02986-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient and Healthcare Provider Perspectives on the Pathway to Diagnosis of Seborrheic Dermatitis in the United States
Introduction
Seborrheic dermatitis (SD) is a common, chronic inflammatory skin condition associated with significant impact on quality of life, yet its etiology and pathophysiology are not well understood. With significant impact on patients’ quality of life, understanding the diagnostic pathway from the perspectives of patient and healthcare providers (HCPs) is crucial.
Methods
An online survey was developed and administered in conjunction with the Harris Poll to gain insight into patient and HCP perspectives about SD diagnosis and management from December 2021 to January 2022.
Results
Most patients were unaware of SD before their diagnosis (71%) and experienced difficulty finding information online (56%). Patients delayed seeking medical attention for SD by an average of 3.6 years, with most patients feeling their symptoms did not require medical attention (63%), a perception that HCPs correctly anticipated. Additionally, most patients (58%) reported embarrassment discussing their SD symptoms with HCPs, a factor HCPs underestimated. HCPs also underestimated the percentage of patients self-reporting moderate-severity SD. Patients preferred dermatology HCPs for SD treatment (79%), and reported visiting an average of 2.3 different HCPs, with 75% of patients seeing more than one provider.
Conclusion
These insights highlight the complexities in the diagnostic and management pathways of SD and underscore the need for a more nuanced understanding and approach in addressing the condition.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.