Lucy Collins, Alec Ronan, Evelyn Hutcheon, Peter R Ebeling, Vivian Grill, Hanh H Nguyen
{"title":"与抗还原疗法相关的非典型部位骨折：系统综述。","authors":"Lucy Collins, Alec Ronan, Evelyn Hutcheon, Peter R Ebeling, Vivian Grill, Hanh H Nguyen","doi":"10.1093/jbmr/zjae159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoporosis is common, affecting more than 20% of women and 6% of men globally over the age of 50 (1). Anti-resorptive drugs, bisphosphonates and denosumab, have been effective treatments for osteoporosis for more than 30 years. Rare complications of anti-resorptive therapy include medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femur fractures (AFF). The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) proposed a case definition for these atypical femoral fractures in 2010, which was updated in 2013. However, atypical fractures at non-classical sites have been increasingly described.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to systematically identify atypical fracture cases, excluded from the ASBMR AFF case definition in patients receiving anti-resorptive medication for longer than three years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane and Web of Sciences, and hand-searching of conference abstracts was undertaken. All full-text articles written in English describing an atypical fracture in patients (aged >18 years) and receiving anti-resorptive medication for >3 years were included, with data extracted and analysed by two independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six articles were identified, describing 151 cases of atypical fractures in 114 individuals. The most frequent fracture site was the ulna, followed by the tibia. All patients were taking anti-resorptive treatment prior to or at the time of fracture, most frequently alendronate monotherapy (44%). Most commonly, fractures were transverse in nature (95%), following minimal or no trauma (96%), non-comminuted (98%) with cortical thickening of the surrounding bone (69%). Anti-resorptive treatment was ceased following atypical fracture in the majority (89%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Atypical fractures are rare and should not deter physicians from appropriate anti-resorptive therapy for osteoporosis. However, clinicians should be alert to their presence, at additional sites to the femur. An update of the current ASBMR AFF case definition to include other skeletal sites could be timely.</p>","PeriodicalId":185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atypical fractures at non-classical sites associated with anti-resorptive therapy: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Lucy Collins, Alec Ronan, Evelyn Hutcheon, Peter R Ebeling, Vivian Grill, Hanh H Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbmr/zjae159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoporosis is common, affecting more than 20% of women and 6% of men globally over the age of 50 (1). Anti-resorptive drugs, bisphosphonates and denosumab, have been effective treatments for osteoporosis for more than 30 years. Rare complications of anti-resorptive therapy include medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femur fractures (AFF). The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) proposed a case definition for these atypical femoral fractures in 2010, which was updated in 2013. However, atypical fractures at non-classical sites have been increasingly described.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to systematically identify atypical fracture cases, excluded from the ASBMR AFF case definition in patients receiving anti-resorptive medication for longer than three years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane and Web of Sciences, and hand-searching of conference abstracts was undertaken. All full-text articles written in English describing an atypical fracture in patients (aged >18 years) and receiving anti-resorptive medication for >3 years were included, with data extracted and analysed by two independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six articles were identified, describing 151 cases of atypical fractures in 114 individuals. The most frequent fracture site was the ulna, followed by the tibia. All patients were taking anti-resorptive treatment prior to or at the time of fracture, most frequently alendronate monotherapy (44%). Most commonly, fractures were transverse in nature (95%), following minimal or no trauma (96%), non-comminuted (98%) with cortical thickening of the surrounding bone (69%). Anti-resorptive treatment was ceased following atypical fracture in the majority (89%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Atypical fractures are rare and should not deter physicians from appropriate anti-resorptive therapy for osteoporosis. However, clinicians should be alert to their presence, at additional sites to the femur. An update of the current ASBMR AFF case definition to include other skeletal sites could be timely.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmr/zjae159\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmr/zjae159","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Atypical fractures at non-classical sites associated with anti-resorptive therapy: A Systematic Review.
Background: Osteoporosis is common, affecting more than 20% of women and 6% of men globally over the age of 50 (1). Anti-resorptive drugs, bisphosphonates and denosumab, have been effective treatments for osteoporosis for more than 30 years. Rare complications of anti-resorptive therapy include medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femur fractures (AFF). The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) proposed a case definition for these atypical femoral fractures in 2010, which was updated in 2013. However, atypical fractures at non-classical sites have been increasingly described.
Aims: We aimed to systematically identify atypical fracture cases, excluded from the ASBMR AFF case definition in patients receiving anti-resorptive medication for longer than three years.
Methods: A structured search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane and Web of Sciences, and hand-searching of conference abstracts was undertaken. All full-text articles written in English describing an atypical fracture in patients (aged >18 years) and receiving anti-resorptive medication for >3 years were included, with data extracted and analysed by two independent reviewers.
Results: Sixty-six articles were identified, describing 151 cases of atypical fractures in 114 individuals. The most frequent fracture site was the ulna, followed by the tibia. All patients were taking anti-resorptive treatment prior to or at the time of fracture, most frequently alendronate monotherapy (44%). Most commonly, fractures were transverse in nature (95%), following minimal or no trauma (96%), non-comminuted (98%) with cortical thickening of the surrounding bone (69%). Anti-resorptive treatment was ceased following atypical fracture in the majority (89%).
Conclusions: Atypical fractures are rare and should not deter physicians from appropriate anti-resorptive therapy for osteoporosis. However, clinicians should be alert to their presence, at additional sites to the femur. An update of the current ASBMR AFF case definition to include other skeletal sites could be timely.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (JBMR) publishes highly impactful original manuscripts, reviews, and special articles on basic, translational and clinical investigations relevant to the musculoskeletal system and mineral metabolism. Specifically, the journal is interested in original research on the biology and physiology of skeletal tissues, interdisciplinary research spanning the musculoskeletal and other systems, including but not limited to immunology, hematology, energy metabolism, cancer biology, and neurology, and systems biology topics using large scale “-omics” approaches. The journal welcomes clinical research on the pathophysiology, treatment and prevention of osteoporosis and fractures, as well as sarcopenia, disorders of bone and mineral metabolism, and rare or genetically determined bone diseases.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
