采取蜱传疾病预防措施的障碍:康涅狄格州、马里兰州 2016-2017 年。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
AmberJean P Hansen, Melanie M Wilkinson, Sara Niesobecki, Heather Rutz, James I Meek, Linda Niccolai, Alison F Hinckley, Sarah Hook
{"title":"采取蜱传疾病预防措施的障碍:康涅狄格州、马里兰州 2016-2017 年。","authors":"AmberJean P Hansen, Melanie M Wilkinson, Sara Niesobecki, Heather Rutz, James I Meek, Linda Niccolai, Alison F Hinckley, Sarah Hook","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Public health programs promote numerous tickborne disease (TBD) prevention measures. However, measures are not frequently or consistently performed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe barriers to consistent use of 4 commonly promoted TBD prevention measures.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted an online survey (n = 1883) evaluating behaviors regarding TBD prevention measures including conducting tick checks, applying insect repellents, showering/bathing, and applying chemical or natural pesticides to residential yards. Respondents could select reasons for never, rarely, or sometimes performing these measures. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression modeling evaluated associations between the 3 most cited barriers for each measure and select demographic variables.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The survey was administered to residents in high Lyme disease incidence counties of Connecticut and Maryland, 2016-2017.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For tick checks (n = 800), the most cited barriers were forgetting (63%), not spending time in tick habitat (28%), and too much trouble (11%). For applying insect repellents (n = 1303), the most cited barriers were forgetting (38%), personal safety concerns (24%), and too much trouble (19%). For showering/bathing 2 hours after outdoor activity in tick habitat (n = 1080), the most cited barriers were being unaware of the prevention measure (51%), too much trouble (18%), and forgetting (18%). For applying chemical pesticides to yards (n = 1320), the most cited barriers were having environmental (45%), pet safety (31%), and personal safety concerns (28%). Lastly, for applying natural pesticides to yards (n = 1357), the most cited barriers were being unaware of natural pesticides (31%), having cost concerns (23%), and not being concerned about ticks on property (16%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Forgetting, too much trouble, unawareness, and safety concerns were primary barriers to using several TBD prevention measures. Education regarding effectiveness, safety, and timing may increase uptake of certain measures. These challenges can be difficult to address, highlighting the need for passive TBD prevention measures, such as a Lyme disease vaccine.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to the Uptake of Tickborne Disease Prevention Measures: Connecticut, Maryland 2016-2017.\",\"authors\":\"AmberJean P Hansen, Melanie M Wilkinson, Sara Niesobecki, Heather Rutz, James I Meek, Linda Niccolai, Alison F Hinckley, Sarah Hook\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Public health programs promote numerous tickborne disease (TBD) prevention measures. However, measures are not frequently or consistently performed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe barriers to consistent use of 4 commonly promoted TBD prevention measures.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted an online survey (n = 1883) evaluating behaviors regarding TBD prevention measures including conducting tick checks, applying insect repellents, showering/bathing, and applying chemical or natural pesticides to residential yards. Respondents could select reasons for never, rarely, or sometimes performing these measures. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression modeling evaluated associations between the 3 most cited barriers for each measure and select demographic variables.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The survey was administered to residents in high Lyme disease incidence counties of Connecticut and Maryland, 2016-2017.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For tick checks (n = 800), the most cited barriers were forgetting (63%), not spending time in tick habitat (28%), and too much trouble (11%). For applying insect repellents (n = 1303), the most cited barriers were forgetting (38%), personal safety concerns (24%), and too much trouble (19%). For showering/bathing 2 hours after outdoor activity in tick habitat (n = 1080), the most cited barriers were being unaware of the prevention measure (51%), too much trouble (18%), and forgetting (18%). For applying chemical pesticides to yards (n = 1320), the most cited barriers were having environmental (45%), pet safety (31%), and personal safety concerns (28%). Lastly, for applying natural pesticides to yards (n = 1357), the most cited barriers were being unaware of natural pesticides (31%), having cost concerns (23%), and not being concerned about ticks on property (16%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Forgetting, too much trouble, unawareness, and safety concerns were primary barriers to using several TBD prevention measures. Education regarding effectiveness, safety, and timing may increase uptake of certain measures. These challenges can be difficult to address, highlighting the need for passive TBD prevention measures, such as a Lyme disease vaccine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002033\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:公共卫生计划推广了许多蜱传疾病 (TBD) 预防措施。然而,这些措施并没有得到经常或一致的执行:描述持续使用 4 种普遍推广的 TBD 预防措施的障碍:我们进行了一项在线调查(n = 1883),评估有关 TBD 预防措施的行为,包括进行蜱虫检查、使用驱虫剂、淋浴/沐浴以及在住宅院子中使用化学或天然杀虫剂。受访者可以选择从不、很少或有时采取这些措施的原因。描述性分析和逻辑回归模型评估了每项措施的 3 个最常见障碍与选定人口统计学变量之间的关联:调查对象为康涅狄格州和马里兰州莱姆病高发县的居民,时间为 2016 年至 2017 年:对于蜱虫检查(n = 800),提到最多的障碍是忘记(63%)、没有时间在蜱虫栖息地(28%)和太麻烦(11%)。在使用驱虫剂方面(n = 1303),最多人提到的障碍是忘记(38%)、个人安全问题(24%)和太麻烦(19%)。对于在蜱虫栖息地进行户外活动 2 小时后淋浴/洗澡(n = 1080),最多人提到的障碍是不知道预防措施(51%)、太麻烦(18%)和忘记(18%)。至于在院子里施用化学杀虫剂(n = 1320),最多人提到的障碍是对环境(45%)、宠物安全(31%)和个人安全(28%)的担忧。最后,对于在院子里施用天然杀虫剂(n = 1357),最多人提到的障碍是不了解天然杀虫剂(31%)、有成本顾虑(23%)和不担心财产上的蜱虫(16%):结论:忘记、太麻烦、不了解和安全顾虑是使用几种 TBD 预防措施的主要障碍。有关有效性、安全性和时机的教育可能会提高某些措施的使用率。这些问题可能难以解决,因此需要采取被动的 TBD 预防措施,如莱姆病疫苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers to the Uptake of Tickborne Disease Prevention Measures: Connecticut, Maryland 2016-2017.

Context: Public health programs promote numerous tickborne disease (TBD) prevention measures. However, measures are not frequently or consistently performed.

Objective: Describe barriers to consistent use of 4 commonly promoted TBD prevention measures.

Design: We conducted an online survey (n = 1883) evaluating behaviors regarding TBD prevention measures including conducting tick checks, applying insect repellents, showering/bathing, and applying chemical or natural pesticides to residential yards. Respondents could select reasons for never, rarely, or sometimes performing these measures. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression modeling evaluated associations between the 3 most cited barriers for each measure and select demographic variables.

Setting: The survey was administered to residents in high Lyme disease incidence counties of Connecticut and Maryland, 2016-2017.

Results: For tick checks (n = 800), the most cited barriers were forgetting (63%), not spending time in tick habitat (28%), and too much trouble (11%). For applying insect repellents (n = 1303), the most cited barriers were forgetting (38%), personal safety concerns (24%), and too much trouble (19%). For showering/bathing 2 hours after outdoor activity in tick habitat (n = 1080), the most cited barriers were being unaware of the prevention measure (51%), too much trouble (18%), and forgetting (18%). For applying chemical pesticides to yards (n = 1320), the most cited barriers were having environmental (45%), pet safety (31%), and personal safety concerns (28%). Lastly, for applying natural pesticides to yards (n = 1357), the most cited barriers were being unaware of natural pesticides (31%), having cost concerns (23%), and not being concerned about ticks on property (16%).

Conclusions: Forgetting, too much trouble, unawareness, and safety concerns were primary barriers to using several TBD prevention measures. Education regarding effectiveness, safety, and timing may increase uptake of certain measures. These challenges can be difficult to address, highlighting the need for passive TBD prevention measures, such as a Lyme disease vaccine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信