{"title":"一项关于社会风险与使用肿瘤支持性护理的医疗服务之间关系的描述性研究。","authors":"Rebecca Cammy, Joshua Banks, Celeste Vaughan-Briggs, Gregory Garber, Steven Pantilat, Brooke Worster","doi":"10.1080/07347332.2024.2404560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study utilized social risk data in the electronic heath record collected as part of routine clinical practice and examined relationships with supportive oncology care contacts and healthcare utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2,807 cancer patients were screened for four social determinants of health (SDOH) domains (financial resource strain, housing instability, food insecurity, and transportation need) and categorized to low or high risk SDOH groups. The number of patient contacts with supportive oncology was compared amongst the groups. The data were analyzed for demographic and outcome differences including emergency department visits, inpatient admissions, and appointment adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Heightened social risk was associated with more total contacts with supportive oncology care. Patients with high SDOH risk had more contacts across all outcomes examined including emergency department visits (<i>M</i> = 13), inpatient admissions (<i>M</i> = 14), and missed appointments (<i>M</i> = 11).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with both greater social risks and acute care utilization are associated with more psychosocial interventions in supportive oncology follow-up. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive action to respond to social risk factors identified in SDOH screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":47451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A descriptive study of the connections between social risk and healthcare utilization with supportive oncology care.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Cammy, Joshua Banks, Celeste Vaughan-Briggs, Gregory Garber, Steven Pantilat, Brooke Worster\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07347332.2024.2404560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study utilized social risk data in the electronic heath record collected as part of routine clinical practice and examined relationships with supportive oncology care contacts and healthcare utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2,807 cancer patients were screened for four social determinants of health (SDOH) domains (financial resource strain, housing instability, food insecurity, and transportation need) and categorized to low or high risk SDOH groups. The number of patient contacts with supportive oncology was compared amongst the groups. The data were analyzed for demographic and outcome differences including emergency department visits, inpatient admissions, and appointment adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Heightened social risk was associated with more total contacts with supportive oncology care. Patients with high SDOH risk had more contacts across all outcomes examined including emergency department visits (<i>M</i> = 13), inpatient admissions (<i>M</i> = 14), and missed appointments (<i>M</i> = 11).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with both greater social risks and acute care utilization are associated with more psychosocial interventions in supportive oncology follow-up. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive action to respond to social risk factors identified in SDOH screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2024.2404560\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2024.2404560","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A descriptive study of the connections between social risk and healthcare utilization with supportive oncology care.
Objective: This study utilized social risk data in the electronic heath record collected as part of routine clinical practice and examined relationships with supportive oncology care contacts and healthcare utilization.
Methods: A total of 2,807 cancer patients were screened for four social determinants of health (SDOH) domains (financial resource strain, housing instability, food insecurity, and transportation need) and categorized to low or high risk SDOH groups. The number of patient contacts with supportive oncology was compared amongst the groups. The data were analyzed for demographic and outcome differences including emergency department visits, inpatient admissions, and appointment adherence.
Results: Heightened social risk was associated with more total contacts with supportive oncology care. Patients with high SDOH risk had more contacts across all outcomes examined including emergency department visits (M = 13), inpatient admissions (M = 14), and missed appointments (M = 11).
Conclusions: Patients with both greater social risks and acute care utilization are associated with more psychosocial interventions in supportive oncology follow-up. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive action to respond to social risk factors identified in SDOH screening.
期刊介绍:
Here is your single source of integrated information on providing the best psychosocial care possible from the knowledge available from many disciplines.The Journal of Psychosocial Oncology is an essential source for up-to-date clinical and research material geared toward health professionals who provide psychosocial services to cancer patients, their families, and their caregivers. The journal—the first interdisciplinary resource of its kind—is in its third decade of examining exploratory and hypothesis testing and presenting program evaluation research on critical areas, including: the stigma of cancer; employment and personal problems facing cancer patients; patient education.