The Schroth Method for Pediatric Scoliosis: A Systematic and Critical Analysis Review.

Background: The Schroth method is the most commonly used patient scoliosis-specific exercise paradigm for treating pediatric scoliosis. The aim of this study is to systematically and critically examine the evidence for the Schroth method for pediatric scoliosis.

Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched through April 5, 2024, for articles examining the Schroth method for pediatric scoliosis (<18 years old). Thirteen review questions were created spanning the study aim. Each included article was independently assessed for the level of evidence (I-IV). Research questions were given a grade of recommendation (A, B, C, and I [insufficient]).

Results: A total of 29 articles (41.4% Level I, 31.0% Level II, 13.8% Level II, and 13.8% Level IV) met inclusion criteria out of 845 initially retrieved, describing 1,555 patients with scoliosis aged 4 to 18 years. There was grade A evidence that the Schroth method is most commonly used for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), can improve the angle of trunk rotation, and is safe; grade B evidence for improvement in posture; and grade I evidence for improvement in Cobb angle, cosmetic deformity, quality of life, ideal treatment parameters, economic value, utility in delaying/preventing surgery, effectiveness in relation to patient characteristics (e.g., skeletal maturity or curve size), and comparative effectiveness to other conservative interventions.

Conclusion: While there is good evidence that the Schroth method is commonly and safely used in AIS and can minimally improve the angle of trunk rotation and fair evidence of improvement in posture, there is insufficient evidence regarding multiple important clinical and economic outcomes, such as comparative effectiveness to other conservative interventions and improvement of Cobb angle. Although clinicians may consider the Schroth method as 1 option of several conservative strategies, clinical benefit may be limited, and further high-quality research is needed to evaluate its performance in areas of insufficient evidence.