Gongmin Rim, Kwanyong Hyun, Deog Gon Cho, Jaemin Cho
{"title":"内冷却射频导管与局部低温疗法能否消除对肿胀麻醉的需求?一项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究。","authors":"Gongmin Rim, Kwanyong Hyun, Deog Gon Cho, Jaemin Cho","doi":"10.1177/02683555241287074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Tumescent anesthesia not only prolongs the operation time but also induces postoperative pain, bruising, and swelling. This study investigated the effectiveness and safety of tumescentless RFA using an internal cooling system with a VENISTAR catheter and local hypothermia. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed patients who had undergone RFA for above-knee (AK) great saphenous vein (GSV) between March 2023 and November 2023. We compared the efficacy and safety of tumescentless RFA between group T (conventional tumescent group, <i>n</i> = 50) and group N (non-tumescent group, <i>n</i> = 59). <b>Results:</b> The operative time was shorter in group N than in group T (group N: 31.37 min, group T: 42.31 min, <i>p</i> < .01), with no severe adverse events occurred in either group, such as endovenous heat-induced thrombosis or deep vein thrombosis. Postoperative pain (Group N, 0.53% vs Group T, 0.52%; <i>p</i> = .86), postoperative complications such as bruising (Group N, 6.78% vs Group T, 4%; N= .34) and paresthesia (Group N, 1.7% vs Group T, 6%; <i>p</i> = .27) showed no significant difference between the two groups on postoperative day 10. <b>Conclusion:</b> Tumescentless RFA with internal cooling and local hypothermia shows promising results with minimal complications. This novel approach represents a recent advancement in endovenous RFA that omits additional tumescent anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555241287074"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can internal cooling radiofrequency catheters with local hypothermia eliminate the need for tumescent anesthesia? A single-center, retrospective, observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Gongmin Rim, Kwanyong Hyun, Deog Gon Cho, Jaemin Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02683555241287074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Tumescent anesthesia not only prolongs the operation time but also induces postoperative pain, bruising, and swelling. This study investigated the effectiveness and safety of tumescentless RFA using an internal cooling system with a VENISTAR catheter and local hypothermia. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed patients who had undergone RFA for above-knee (AK) great saphenous vein (GSV) between March 2023 and November 2023. We compared the efficacy and safety of tumescentless RFA between group T (conventional tumescent group, <i>n</i> = 50) and group N (non-tumescent group, <i>n</i> = 59). <b>Results:</b> The operative time was shorter in group N than in group T (group N: 31.37 min, group T: 42.31 min, <i>p</i> < .01), with no severe adverse events occurred in either group, such as endovenous heat-induced thrombosis or deep vein thrombosis. Postoperative pain (Group N, 0.53% vs Group T, 0.52%; <i>p</i> = .86), postoperative complications such as bruising (Group N, 6.78% vs Group T, 4%; N= .34) and paresthesia (Group N, 1.7% vs Group T, 6%; <i>p</i> = .27) showed no significant difference between the two groups on postoperative day 10. <b>Conclusion:</b> Tumescentless RFA with internal cooling and local hypothermia shows promising results with minimal complications. This novel approach represents a recent advancement in endovenous RFA that omits additional tumescent anesthesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phlebology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2683555241287074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phlebology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555241287074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555241287074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:膨胀麻醉不仅会延长手术时间,还会引起术后疼痛、瘀伤和肿胀。本研究调查了使用带有 VENISTAR 导管的内部冷却系统和局部低温的无肿胀 RFA 的有效性和安全性。研究方法我们回顾性分析了 2023 年 3 月至 2023 年 11 月期间接受 RFA 治疗膝上 (AK) 大隐静脉 (GSV) 的患者。我们比较了 T 组(传统抽脂组,50 人)和 N 组(非抽脂组,59 人)无抽脂 RFA 的有效性和安全性。结果N 组的手术时间短于 T 组(N 组:31.37 分钟,T 组:42.31 分钟,P < .01),两组均未发生严重不良事件,如静脉内热诱发血栓或深静脉血栓。术后疼痛(N 组:0.53% vs T 组:0.52%;P = .86)、术后并发症如瘀伤(N 组:6.78% vs T 组:4%;N= .34)和麻痹(N 组:1.7% vs T 组:6%;P = .27)在术后第 10 天两组间无显著差异。结论采用内冷却和局部低温的无瘤体 RFA 术效果良好,并发症极少。这种新方法代表了静脉腔内射频消融术的最新进展,省去了额外的肿胀麻醉。
Can internal cooling radiofrequency catheters with local hypothermia eliminate the need for tumescent anesthesia? A single-center, retrospective, observational study.
Background: Tumescent anesthesia not only prolongs the operation time but also induces postoperative pain, bruising, and swelling. This study investigated the effectiveness and safety of tumescentless RFA using an internal cooling system with a VENISTAR catheter and local hypothermia. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who had undergone RFA for above-knee (AK) great saphenous vein (GSV) between March 2023 and November 2023. We compared the efficacy and safety of tumescentless RFA between group T (conventional tumescent group, n = 50) and group N (non-tumescent group, n = 59). Results: The operative time was shorter in group N than in group T (group N: 31.37 min, group T: 42.31 min, p < .01), with no severe adverse events occurred in either group, such as endovenous heat-induced thrombosis or deep vein thrombosis. Postoperative pain (Group N, 0.53% vs Group T, 0.52%; p = .86), postoperative complications such as bruising (Group N, 6.78% vs Group T, 4%; N= .34) and paresthesia (Group N, 1.7% vs Group T, 6%; p = .27) showed no significant difference between the two groups on postoperative day 10. Conclusion: Tumescentless RFA with internal cooling and local hypothermia shows promising results with minimal complications. This novel approach represents a recent advancement in endovenous RFA that omits additional tumescent anesthesia.