{"title":"评估牙周敷料的生物相容性:体外研究","authors":"Fatema Akhter","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_335_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periodontal dressings play a crucial role in post-operative management of periodontal surgeries by protecting surgical sites and promoting wound healing. Biocompatibility evaluation is essential to ensure the safety and effectiveness of these materials. This study aims to assess the biocompatibility of periodontal dressings through an <i>in vitro</i> approach.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this <i>in vitro</i> study, three commercially available periodontal dressings were evaluated for their biocompatibility. The Dressings were Dressing A: Coe-Pak<sup>™</sup> Dressing B: Barricaid<sup>®</sup> and Dressing C: PeriAcryl<sup>®</sup>. Human gingival fibroblast cells were cultured and exposed to extracts of the dressings using the MTT assay to assess cell viability. Additionally, cell morphology and attachment were observed under a microscope. The experiment was conducted in triplicate for each dressing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MTT assay revealed that Dressing A exhibited the highest cell viability with an absorbance value of 0.8 ± 0.1, followed by Dressing B with a value of 0.6 ± 0.2 and Dressing C with a value of 0.5 ± 0.1. Microscopic analysis showed normal cell morphology and attachment in cells exposed to Dressing A and Dressing B extracts, while cells exposed to Dressing C exhibited slight detachment and irregular morphology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that Dressing A and Dressing B demonstrate favorable biocompatibility profiles, as evidenced by higher cell viability and normal cell morphology.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"16 Suppl 3","pages":"S2500-S2502"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Biocompatibility of Periodontal Dressings: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.\",\"authors\":\"Fatema Akhter\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_335_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periodontal dressings play a crucial role in post-operative management of periodontal surgeries by protecting surgical sites and promoting wound healing. Biocompatibility evaluation is essential to ensure the safety and effectiveness of these materials. This study aims to assess the biocompatibility of periodontal dressings through an <i>in vitro</i> approach.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this <i>in vitro</i> study, three commercially available periodontal dressings were evaluated for their biocompatibility. The Dressings were Dressing A: Coe-Pak<sup>™</sup> Dressing B: Barricaid<sup>®</sup> and Dressing C: PeriAcryl<sup>®</sup>. Human gingival fibroblast cells were cultured and exposed to extracts of the dressings using the MTT assay to assess cell viability. Additionally, cell morphology and attachment were observed under a microscope. The experiment was conducted in triplicate for each dressing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MTT assay revealed that Dressing A exhibited the highest cell viability with an absorbance value of 0.8 ± 0.1, followed by Dressing B with a value of 0.6 ± 0.2 and Dressing C with a value of 0.5 ± 0.1. Microscopic analysis showed normal cell morphology and attachment in cells exposed to Dressing A and Dressing B extracts, while cells exposed to Dressing C exhibited slight detachment and irregular morphology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that Dressing A and Dressing B demonstrate favorable biocompatibility profiles, as evidenced by higher cell viability and normal cell morphology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences\",\"volume\":\"16 Suppl 3\",\"pages\":\"S2500-S2502\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426820/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_335_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_335_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:牙周敷料通过保护手术部位和促进伤口愈合,在牙周手术的术后管理中发挥着至关重要的作用。生物相容性评估对于确保这些材料的安全性和有效性至关重要。本研究旨在通过体外方法评估牙周敷料的生物相容性:在这项体外研究中,对三种市售牙周敷料的生物相容性进行了评估。敷料 A:Coe-Pak™ 敷料 B:Barricaid® 和敷料 C:PeriAcryl® 。培养人牙龈成纤维细胞并将其暴露在敷料提取物中,使用 MTT 法评估细胞活力。此外,还在显微镜下观察了细胞形态和附着情况。每种敷料的实验均一式三份:MTT 检测显示,敷料 A 的细胞存活率最高,吸光度值为 0.8 ± 0.1,其次是敷料 B(0.6 ± 0.2)和敷料 C(0.5 ± 0.1)。显微镜分析表明,暴露于敷料 A 和敷料 B 提取物的细胞形态和附着力正常,而暴露于敷料 C 的细胞则表现出轻微脱落和不规则形态:我们的研究结果表明,敷料 A 和敷料 B 具有良好的生物相容性,细胞存活率较高,细胞形态正常。
Evaluation of the Biocompatibility of Periodontal Dressings: An In Vitro Study.
Background: Periodontal dressings play a crucial role in post-operative management of periodontal surgeries by protecting surgical sites and promoting wound healing. Biocompatibility evaluation is essential to ensure the safety and effectiveness of these materials. This study aims to assess the biocompatibility of periodontal dressings through an in vitro approach.
Materials and methods: In this in vitro study, three commercially available periodontal dressings were evaluated for their biocompatibility. The Dressings were Dressing A: Coe-Pak™ Dressing B: Barricaid® and Dressing C: PeriAcryl®. Human gingival fibroblast cells were cultured and exposed to extracts of the dressings using the MTT assay to assess cell viability. Additionally, cell morphology and attachment were observed under a microscope. The experiment was conducted in triplicate for each dressing.
Results: The MTT assay revealed that Dressing A exhibited the highest cell viability with an absorbance value of 0.8 ± 0.1, followed by Dressing B with a value of 0.6 ± 0.2 and Dressing C with a value of 0.5 ± 0.1. Microscopic analysis showed normal cell morphology and attachment in cells exposed to Dressing A and Dressing B extracts, while cells exposed to Dressing C exhibited slight detachment and irregular morphology.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that Dressing A and Dressing B demonstrate favorable biocompatibility profiles, as evidenced by higher cell viability and normal cell morphology.