评估单次根管治疗与多次根管治疗的术后疼痛和愈合情况

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_278_24
Mubashir Baig Mirza, Prasanthi Cherukuri, Tony Mathew, Nagaratna Bagewadi, Vamshi V Krishna, Hitesh Chohan, Radhika Thakkar
{"title":"评估单次根管治疗与多次根管治疗的术后疼痛和愈合情况","authors":"Mubashir Baig Mirza, Prasanthi Cherukuri, Tony Mathew, Nagaratna Bagewadi, Vamshi V Krishna, Hitesh Chohan, Radhika Thakkar","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_278_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>\"<i>Root canal therapy</i> (RCT)\" is a common endodontic procedure targeted at preserving teeth compromised by pulp infection. The debate over the optimal number of visits for RCT remains inconclusive, with single- and multiple-visit approaches both being advocated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective research was conducted on 100 subjects undergoing RCT at a tertiary care center. Subjects were randomly ascribed to the single-/multiple-visit group. Post-operative pain was assessed using a \"visual analog scale,\" and healing outcomes were evaluated through peri-apical radiographs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-operative pain levels were comparable between the single- and multiple-visit clusters at all time points. However, healing outcomes differed significantly, with a higher percentage of healed cases observed in the single-visit group compared to the multiple-visit group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While both single-visit and multiple-visit RCT protocols resulted in similar post-operative pain levels, the single-visit approach demonstrated superior healing outcomes. These findings emphasize the need for personalized treatment approaches based on patient characteristics and clinical considerations in endodontic practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"16 Suppl 3","pages":"S2381-S2384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Post-Operative Pain and Healing in Single-Visit versus Multiple-Visit Root Canal Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Mubashir Baig Mirza, Prasanthi Cherukuri, Tony Mathew, Nagaratna Bagewadi, Vamshi V Krishna, Hitesh Chohan, Radhika Thakkar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_278_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>\\\"<i>Root canal therapy</i> (RCT)\\\" is a common endodontic procedure targeted at preserving teeth compromised by pulp infection. The debate over the optimal number of visits for RCT remains inconclusive, with single- and multiple-visit approaches both being advocated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective research was conducted on 100 subjects undergoing RCT at a tertiary care center. Subjects were randomly ascribed to the single-/multiple-visit group. Post-operative pain was assessed using a \\\"visual analog scale,\\\" and healing outcomes were evaluated through peri-apical radiographs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-operative pain levels were comparable between the single- and multiple-visit clusters at all time points. However, healing outcomes differed significantly, with a higher percentage of healed cases observed in the single-visit group compared to the multiple-visit group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While both single-visit and multiple-visit RCT protocols resulted in similar post-operative pain levels, the single-visit approach demonstrated superior healing outcomes. These findings emphasize the need for personalized treatment approaches based on patient characteristics and clinical considerations in endodontic practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences\",\"volume\":\"16 Suppl 3\",\"pages\":\"S2381-S2384\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426807/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_278_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_278_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:"根管治疗 (RCT) "是一种常见的牙髓治疗方法,旨在保护因牙髓感染而受损的牙齿。关于根管治疗最佳就诊次数的争论仍无定论,单次就诊和多次就诊两种方法均被提倡:方法:在一家三级医疗中心对 100 名接受 RCT 的受试者进行了前瞻性研究。受试者被随机分配到单次/多次就诊组。使用 "视觉模拟量表 "评估术后疼痛,并通过根尖周X光片评估愈合效果:结果:在所有时间点,单次就诊组和多次就诊组的术后疼痛程度相当。然而,愈合结果却有显著差异,与多次就诊组相比,单次就诊组的愈合率更高:结论:虽然单次就诊和多次就诊的 RCT 方案导致的术后疼痛程度相似,但单次就诊方法的愈合效果更好。这些发现强调了在牙髓治疗实践中根据患者特征和临床考虑因素采取个性化治疗方法的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Post-Operative Pain and Healing in Single-Visit versus Multiple-Visit Root Canal Therapy.

Background: "Root canal therapy (RCT)" is a common endodontic procedure targeted at preserving teeth compromised by pulp infection. The debate over the optimal number of visits for RCT remains inconclusive, with single- and multiple-visit approaches both being advocated.

Methods: A prospective research was conducted on 100 subjects undergoing RCT at a tertiary care center. Subjects were randomly ascribed to the single-/multiple-visit group. Post-operative pain was assessed using a "visual analog scale," and healing outcomes were evaluated through peri-apical radiographs.

Results: Post-operative pain levels were comparable between the single- and multiple-visit clusters at all time points. However, healing outcomes differed significantly, with a higher percentage of healed cases observed in the single-visit group compared to the multiple-visit group.

Conclusion: While both single-visit and multiple-visit RCT protocols resulted in similar post-operative pain levels, the single-visit approach demonstrated superior healing outcomes. These findings emphasize the need for personalized treatment approaches based on patient characteristics and clinical considerations in endodontic practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信