不同粘接剂在微创龋齿预备中的效果

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_285_24
Niladri Maiti, Abhilasha Bhawalkar, Rozina Hussain Ali, Nallamilli Lalitha Sri Roja, Pratik Agrawal, Anshuman Shetty, Shalini Singh
{"title":"不同粘接剂在微创龋齿预备中的效果","authors":"Niladri Maiti, Abhilasha Bhawalkar, Rozina Hussain Ali, Nallamilli Lalitha Sri Roja, Pratik Agrawal, Anshuman Shetty, Shalini Singh","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_285_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This research is meant to evaluate the effectiveness of different bonding agents in minimally invasive cavity preparations at a tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective research was conducted involving patients requiring minimally invasive cavity preparations. Patients were randomly assigned to groups based on the bonding agent used. Standardized cavity preparations were performed, and bonding agent application followed manufacturer instructions. Outcome measures included bond strength and marginal adaptation. Data were analyzed using appropriate statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bonding Agent A exhibited the highest mean bond strength (25.6 MPa) and superior marginal adaptation (mean score: 4.2) compared to Bonding Agents B and C. These differences were statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.001 for bond strength, <i>P</i> < 0.05 for marginal adaptation).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bonding Agent A demonstrated superior performance in achieving durable and esthetically pleasing restorations in minimally invasive cavity preparations. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate bonding agents for conservative dental treatments to optimize treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"16 Suppl 3","pages":"S2394-S2396"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Different Bonding Agents in Minimally Invasive Cavity Preparations.\",\"authors\":\"Niladri Maiti, Abhilasha Bhawalkar, Rozina Hussain Ali, Nallamilli Lalitha Sri Roja, Pratik Agrawal, Anshuman Shetty, Shalini Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_285_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This research is meant to evaluate the effectiveness of different bonding agents in minimally invasive cavity preparations at a tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective research was conducted involving patients requiring minimally invasive cavity preparations. Patients were randomly assigned to groups based on the bonding agent used. Standardized cavity preparations were performed, and bonding agent application followed manufacturer instructions. Outcome measures included bond strength and marginal adaptation. Data were analyzed using appropriate statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bonding Agent A exhibited the highest mean bond strength (25.6 MPa) and superior marginal adaptation (mean score: 4.2) compared to Bonding Agents B and C. These differences were statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.001 for bond strength, <i>P</i> < 0.05 for marginal adaptation).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bonding Agent A demonstrated superior performance in achieving durable and esthetically pleasing restorations in minimally invasive cavity preparations. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate bonding agents for conservative dental treatments to optimize treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences\",\"volume\":\"16 Suppl 3\",\"pages\":\"S2394-S2396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426617/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_285_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_285_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估不同粘接剂在一家三级医疗中心的微创龋齿预备中的有效性:对需要进行微创龋洞预备的患者进行前瞻性研究。根据使用的粘接剂将患者随机分配到不同的组别。进行标准化的龋洞预备,粘接剂的使用遵循生产商的说明。结果测量包括粘接强度和边缘适应性。采用适当的统计方法对数据进行分析:结果:与粘接剂 B 和 C 相比,粘接剂 A 的平均粘接强度最高(25.6 兆帕),边缘适应性更好(平均分:4.2):结论:粘接剂A在微创龋洞预备中实现持久、美观的修复方面表现优异。这些发现强调了在牙科保守治疗中选择适当的粘接剂对优化治疗效果和患者满意度的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Different Bonding Agents in Minimally Invasive Cavity Preparations.

Objective: This research is meant to evaluate the effectiveness of different bonding agents in minimally invasive cavity preparations at a tertiary care center.

Materials and methods: A prospective research was conducted involving patients requiring minimally invasive cavity preparations. Patients were randomly assigned to groups based on the bonding agent used. Standardized cavity preparations were performed, and bonding agent application followed manufacturer instructions. Outcome measures included bond strength and marginal adaptation. Data were analyzed using appropriate statistical methods.

Results: Bonding Agent A exhibited the highest mean bond strength (25.6 MPa) and superior marginal adaptation (mean score: 4.2) compared to Bonding Agents B and C. These differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001 for bond strength, P < 0.05 for marginal adaptation).

Conclusion: Bonding Agent A demonstrated superior performance in achieving durable and esthetically pleasing restorations in minimally invasive cavity preparations. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate bonding agents for conservative dental treatments to optimize treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信