通过假体螺钉的应力和阻力比较不同的植入系统:原创研究

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_381_24
Pramod Punchiri Sadan
{"title":"通过假体螺钉的应力和阻力比较不同的植入系统:原创研究","authors":"Pramod Punchiri Sadan","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_381_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>For the best possible clinical results, dental implant systems must have their biomechanical characteristics thoroughly evaluated. These systems are essential to restorative dentistry. The purpose of this study was to analyze the resistance and stress distribution of prosthetic screws across five distinct implant systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The stress distribution on prosthesis screws was evaluated, and loading conditions were simulated using finite element analysis (FEA). To assess the screws' resistance to torque forces, mechanical testing was done.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among the implant systems, there were notable differences in torque resistance and stress distribution. System A had the least amount of stress and the most torque resistance, whereas System E displayed the most stress and the least torque resistance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results emphasize the significance of taking biomechanical characteristics into account when choosing implant systems for clinical usage, which has ramifications for patient care and treatment planning. Additional investigation concentrating on thorough clinical assessments is necessary to confirm these results and enhance treatment plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"16 Suppl 3","pages":"S2652-S2654"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Different Implant Systems by Stress and Resistance of Prosthetic Screws: An Original Research.\",\"authors\":\"Pramod Punchiri Sadan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_381_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>For the best possible clinical results, dental implant systems must have their biomechanical characteristics thoroughly evaluated. These systems are essential to restorative dentistry. The purpose of this study was to analyze the resistance and stress distribution of prosthetic screws across five distinct implant systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The stress distribution on prosthesis screws was evaluated, and loading conditions were simulated using finite element analysis (FEA). To assess the screws' resistance to torque forces, mechanical testing was done.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among the implant systems, there were notable differences in torque resistance and stress distribution. System A had the least amount of stress and the most torque resistance, whereas System E displayed the most stress and the least torque resistance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results emphasize the significance of taking biomechanical characteristics into account when choosing implant systems for clinical usage, which has ramifications for patient care and treatment planning. Additional investigation concentrating on thorough clinical assessments is necessary to confirm these results and enhance treatment plans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences\",\"volume\":\"16 Suppl 3\",\"pages\":\"S2652-S2654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426735/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_381_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_381_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介为了获得最佳的临床效果,必须对牙科种植系统的生物力学特性进行全面评估。这些系统对牙科修复至关重要。本研究的目的是分析五种不同种植系统的修复螺钉的阻力和应力分布:方法:评估修复螺钉的应力分布,并使用有限元分析(FEA)模拟加载条件。为了评估螺钉对扭矩力的抵抗力,进行了机械测试:在不同的种植体系统中,抗扭力和应力分布存在明显差异。系统 A 的应力最小,抗扭力最大,而系统 E 的应力最大,抗扭力最小:结果强调了在临床使用中选择种植系统时考虑生物力学特性的重要性,这对患者护理和治疗计划都有影响。为了证实这些结果并改进治疗计划,有必要进行更多的调查,并集中于全面的临床评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Different Implant Systems by Stress and Resistance of Prosthetic Screws: An Original Research.

Introduction: For the best possible clinical results, dental implant systems must have their biomechanical characteristics thoroughly evaluated. These systems are essential to restorative dentistry. The purpose of this study was to analyze the resistance and stress distribution of prosthetic screws across five distinct implant systems.

Methods: The stress distribution on prosthesis screws was evaluated, and loading conditions were simulated using finite element analysis (FEA). To assess the screws' resistance to torque forces, mechanical testing was done.

Findings: Among the implant systems, there were notable differences in torque resistance and stress distribution. System A had the least amount of stress and the most torque resistance, whereas System E displayed the most stress and the least torque resistance.

Conclusion: The results emphasize the significance of taking biomechanical characteristics into account when choosing implant systems for clinical usage, which has ramifications for patient care and treatment planning. Additional investigation concentrating on thorough clinical assessments is necessary to confirm these results and enhance treatment plans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信