用于预测血液透析患者全因死亡率和死亡时间的可解释机器学习模型。

Minjie Chen, Youbing Zeng, Mengting Liu, Zhenghui Li, Jiazhen Wu, Xuan Tian, Yunuo Wang, Yuanwen Xu
{"title":"用于预测血液透析患者全因死亡率和死亡时间的可解释机器学习模型。","authors":"Minjie Chen, Youbing Zeng, Mengting Liu, Zhenghui Li, Jiazhen Wu, Xuan Tian, Yunuo Wang, Yuanwen Xu","doi":"10.1111/1744-9987.14212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The elevated mortality and hospitalization rates among hemodialysis (HD) patients underscore the necessity for the development of accurate predictive tools. This study developed two models for predicting all-cause mortality and time to death-one using a comprehensive database and another simpler model based on demographic and clinical data without laboratory tests.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2017 to June 2023. Two models were created: Model A with 85 variables and Model B with 22 variables. We assessed the models using random forest (RF), support vector machine, and logistic regression, comparing their performance via the AU-ROC. The RF regression model was used to predict time to death. To identify the most relevant factors for prediction, the Shapley value method was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 359 HD patients, the RF model provided the most reliable prediction. The optimized Model A showed an AU-ROC of 0.86 ± 0.07, a sensitivity of 0.86, and a specificity of 0.75 for predicting all-cause mortality. It also had an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.59 for predicting time to death. The optimized Model B had an AU-ROC of 0.80 ± 0.06, a sensitivity of 0.81, and a specificity of 0.70 for predicting all-cause mortality. In addition, it had an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.81 for predicting time to death.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Two new interpretable clinical tools have been proposed to predict all-cause mortality and time to death in HD patients using machine learning models. The minimal and readily accessible data on which Model B is based makes it a valuable tool for integrating into clinical decision-making processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94253,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpretable machine learning models for the prediction of all-cause mortality and time to death in hemodialysis patients.\",\"authors\":\"Minjie Chen, Youbing Zeng, Mengting Liu, Zhenghui Li, Jiazhen Wu, Xuan Tian, Yunuo Wang, Yuanwen Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1744-9987.14212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The elevated mortality and hospitalization rates among hemodialysis (HD) patients underscore the necessity for the development of accurate predictive tools. This study developed two models for predicting all-cause mortality and time to death-one using a comprehensive database and another simpler model based on demographic and clinical data without laboratory tests.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2017 to June 2023. Two models were created: Model A with 85 variables and Model B with 22 variables. We assessed the models using random forest (RF), support vector machine, and logistic regression, comparing their performance via the AU-ROC. The RF regression model was used to predict time to death. To identify the most relevant factors for prediction, the Shapley value method was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 359 HD patients, the RF model provided the most reliable prediction. The optimized Model A showed an AU-ROC of 0.86 ± 0.07, a sensitivity of 0.86, and a specificity of 0.75 for predicting all-cause mortality. It also had an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.59 for predicting time to death. The optimized Model B had an AU-ROC of 0.80 ± 0.06, a sensitivity of 0.81, and a specificity of 0.70 for predicting all-cause mortality. In addition, it had an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.81 for predicting time to death.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Two new interpretable clinical tools have been proposed to predict all-cause mortality and time to death in HD patients using machine learning models. The minimal and readily accessible data on which Model B is based makes it a valuable tool for integrating into clinical decision-making processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.14212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.14212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:血液透析(HD)患者死亡率和住院率的升高凸显了开发精确预测工具的必要性。本研究开发了两种预测全因死亡率和死亡时间的模型,一种是使用综合数据库的模型,另一种是基于人口统计学和临床数据的简单模型,无需实验室检测:方法:从 2017 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月进行了一项回顾性队列研究。建立了两个模型:模型 A 包含 85 个变量,模型 B 包含 22 个变量。我们使用随机森林(RF)、支持向量机和逻辑回归对模型进行了评估,并通过 AU-ROC 对其性能进行了比较。RF 回归模型用于预测死亡时间。为了确定最相关的预测因素,采用了夏普利值法:结果:在 359 名 HD 患者中,RF 模型的预测结果最为可靠。优化后的模型 A 预测全因死亡率的 AU-ROC 为 0.86 ± 0.07,灵敏度为 0.86,特异度为 0.75。预测死亡时间的 R2 也为 0.59。优化模型 B 预测全因死亡率的 AU-ROC 为 0.80 ± 0.06,灵敏度为 0.81,特异度为 0.70。此外,该模型预测死亡时间的 R2 为 0.81:结论:利用机器学习模型,我们提出了两种新的可解释的临床工具来预测 HD 患者的全因死亡率和死亡时间。模型 B 所依据的数据极少且易于获取,这使其成为一种有价值的工具,可将其纳入临床决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interpretable machine learning models for the prediction of all-cause mortality and time to death in hemodialysis patients.

Introduction: The elevated mortality and hospitalization rates among hemodialysis (HD) patients underscore the necessity for the development of accurate predictive tools. This study developed two models for predicting all-cause mortality and time to death-one using a comprehensive database and another simpler model based on demographic and clinical data without laboratory tests.

Method: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2017 to June 2023. Two models were created: Model A with 85 variables and Model B with 22 variables. We assessed the models using random forest (RF), support vector machine, and logistic regression, comparing their performance via the AU-ROC. The RF regression model was used to predict time to death. To identify the most relevant factors for prediction, the Shapley value method was used.

Results: Among 359 HD patients, the RF model provided the most reliable prediction. The optimized Model A showed an AU-ROC of 0.86 ± 0.07, a sensitivity of 0.86, and a specificity of 0.75 for predicting all-cause mortality. It also had an R2 of 0.59 for predicting time to death. The optimized Model B had an AU-ROC of 0.80 ± 0.06, a sensitivity of 0.81, and a specificity of 0.70 for predicting all-cause mortality. In addition, it had an R2 of 0.81 for predicting time to death.

Conclusion: Two new interpretable clinical tools have been proposed to predict all-cause mortality and time to death in HD patients using machine learning models. The minimal and readily accessible data on which Model B is based makes it a valuable tool for integrating into clinical decision-making processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信