比较完全无管和无管经皮肾镜碎石术与标准技术。

Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ Pub Date : 2024-10-01
F H Siddique, M I Ali, M A Amin, P P Chowdhury, N Alam
{"title":"比较完全无管和无管经皮肾镜碎石术与标准技术。","authors":"F H Siddique, M I Ali, M A Amin, P P Chowdhury, N Alam","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditionally, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) includes placing a nephrostomy tube and a Double J (DJ) stent to drain the kidney and operative tract following the procedure. However, more recent techniques, such as tubeless or totally tubeless PCNL, eliminate these drainage methods. The objective was to assess the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of performing tubeless or totally tubeless PCNL in comparison to standard PCNL a retrospective analysis was performed on 156 patients who underwent PCNL treatment From September 2022 to September 2023. Of these, 78 patients received traditional nephrostomy PCNL, while 46 patients underwent the tubeless procedure and the remaining 32 received the totally tubeless procedure. The three groups showed no significant differences in preoperative patient characteristics. The operation time, analgesic requirements and hospital stay were lower in the tubeless and totally tubeless PCNL group than in the standard PCNL group (p<0.05). No significant differences were found in the mean stone size, stone-free status or the occurrence of major complications. The overall complications (Grade-1, 2 and 3) rate was 14.2% in the standard PCNL group, 8.7% in the tubeless PCNL and 9.4% in the totally tubeless PCNL group. The tubeless and totally tubeless PCNL techniques have proven to be safe and effective, even for patients with incomplete staghorn stones and a moderate pelvic stone burden. These approaches are associated with reduced pain, lower analgesic needs, shorter operative times, and decreased hospital stays, making them more cost- effective and less likely to result in complications, while also improving patient satisfaction. Further research is essential to validate the safety of these techniques, encouraging urologists to adopt them in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94148,"journal":{"name":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Totally Tubeless and Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Standard Techniques.\",\"authors\":\"F H Siddique, M I Ali, M A Amin, P P Chowdhury, N Alam\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Traditionally, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) includes placing a nephrostomy tube and a Double J (DJ) stent to drain the kidney and operative tract following the procedure. However, more recent techniques, such as tubeless or totally tubeless PCNL, eliminate these drainage methods. The objective was to assess the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of performing tubeless or totally tubeless PCNL in comparison to standard PCNL a retrospective analysis was performed on 156 patients who underwent PCNL treatment From September 2022 to September 2023. Of these, 78 patients received traditional nephrostomy PCNL, while 46 patients underwent the tubeless procedure and the remaining 32 received the totally tubeless procedure. The three groups showed no significant differences in preoperative patient characteristics. The operation time, analgesic requirements and hospital stay were lower in the tubeless and totally tubeless PCNL group than in the standard PCNL group (p<0.05). No significant differences were found in the mean stone size, stone-free status or the occurrence of major complications. The overall complications (Grade-1, 2 and 3) rate was 14.2% in the standard PCNL group, 8.7% in the tubeless PCNL and 9.4% in the totally tubeless PCNL group. The tubeless and totally tubeless PCNL techniques have proven to be safe and effective, even for patients with incomplete staghorn stones and a moderate pelvic stone burden. These approaches are associated with reduced pain, lower analgesic needs, shorter operative times, and decreased hospital stays, making them more cost- effective and less likely to result in complications, while also improving patient satisfaction. Further research is essential to validate the safety of these techniques, encouraging urologists to adopt them in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统上,经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)包括放置肾造瘘管和双J(DJ)支架,以便在手术后引流肾脏和手术道。然而,无管或完全无管 PCNL 等最新技术取消了这些引流方法。我们对 2022 年 9 月至 2023 年 9 月期间接受 PCNL 治疗的 156 名患者进行了回顾性分析,目的是评估无管或完全无管 PCNL 与标准 PCNL 相比的可行性、安全性和有效性。其中,78 名患者接受了传统肾造瘘 PCNL,46 名患者接受了无管手术,其余 32 名患者接受了完全无管手术。三组患者术前特征无明显差异。无管和完全无管 PCNL 组的手术时间、镇痛要求和住院时间均低于标准 PCNL 组(P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Totally Tubeless and Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Standard Techniques.

Traditionally, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) includes placing a nephrostomy tube and a Double J (DJ) stent to drain the kidney and operative tract following the procedure. However, more recent techniques, such as tubeless or totally tubeless PCNL, eliminate these drainage methods. The objective was to assess the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of performing tubeless or totally tubeless PCNL in comparison to standard PCNL a retrospective analysis was performed on 156 patients who underwent PCNL treatment From September 2022 to September 2023. Of these, 78 patients received traditional nephrostomy PCNL, while 46 patients underwent the tubeless procedure and the remaining 32 received the totally tubeless procedure. The three groups showed no significant differences in preoperative patient characteristics. The operation time, analgesic requirements and hospital stay were lower in the tubeless and totally tubeless PCNL group than in the standard PCNL group (p<0.05). No significant differences were found in the mean stone size, stone-free status or the occurrence of major complications. The overall complications (Grade-1, 2 and 3) rate was 14.2% in the standard PCNL group, 8.7% in the tubeless PCNL and 9.4% in the totally tubeless PCNL group. The tubeless and totally tubeless PCNL techniques have proven to be safe and effective, even for patients with incomplete staghorn stones and a moderate pelvic stone burden. These approaches are associated with reduced pain, lower analgesic needs, shorter operative times, and decreased hospital stays, making them more cost- effective and less likely to result in complications, while also improving patient satisfaction. Further research is essential to validate the safety of these techniques, encouraging urologists to adopt them in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信