评价椎管内地塞米松插入剂治疗过敏性结膜炎的随机、多中心 3 期临床试验。

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2024-09-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S476419
Kenneth Kenyon, Eugene B McLaurin, Steven M Silverstein, John C Meyer, Erik Anderson, Ravi H Patel, Paul J Gomes, Erin Reilly, Srilatha Vantipalli, Matthew W Cheung, Michael H Goldstein
{"title":"评价椎管内地塞米松插入剂治疗过敏性结膜炎的随机、多中心 3 期临床试验。","authors":"Kenneth Kenyon, Eugene B McLaurin, Steven M Silverstein, John C Meyer, Erik Anderson, Ravi H Patel, Paul J Gomes, Erin Reilly, Srilatha Vantipalli, Matthew W Cheung, Michael H Goldstein","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S476419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a dexamethasone intracanalicular insert (DEX) for treatment of allergic conjunctivitis (AC).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled phase 3 study, adults (≥18 years) with AC were randomized 1:1 to DEX or placebo insert (PBO) placed bilaterally. Subjects underwent repetitive conjunctival allergen challenges (CAC) across 30 days and were assessed for changes in AC signs and symptoms. The primary endpoint was ocular itching score at 3, 5, and 7 minutes post-CAC at Day 8 (7 days post-insertion). This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04050865).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-six subjects were randomized (n=48 DEX, n=48 PBO). Compared to PBO, there were statistically significant treatment differences favoring DEX for the primary endpoint of mean ocular itching score at Day 8 (-0.86, -0.98, -0.96 at 3, 5, and 7 minutes post-CAC respectively; <i>P</i><0.0001 for all). Treatment differences favored DEX for all 24 time points across 6 visits and were statistically significant (<i>P</i><0.05) except for the first post-insertion (Day 7, 3 minutes). For the 18 time points at which conjunctival redness was assessed, DEX had lower scores than PBO (<i>P</i><0.05 for all). The most common ocular adverse events (AEs) in DEX subjects were eye discharge and irritation. No serious AEs, elevated intraocular pressure, dacryocanaliculitis, or use of rescue medications were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results of this study support the potential use of dexamethasone insert as a physician-administered, preservative-free treatment for AC, with significant improvements in ocular itching and conjunctival redness compared with placebo. The dexamethasone insert was generally safe with a favorable safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized, Multicenter Phase 3 Clinical Trial Evaluating Intracanalicular Dexamethasone Insert for the Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis.\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth Kenyon, Eugene B McLaurin, Steven M Silverstein, John C Meyer, Erik Anderson, Ravi H Patel, Paul J Gomes, Erin Reilly, Srilatha Vantipalli, Matthew W Cheung, Michael H Goldstein\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTH.S476419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a dexamethasone intracanalicular insert (DEX) for treatment of allergic conjunctivitis (AC).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled phase 3 study, adults (≥18 years) with AC were randomized 1:1 to DEX or placebo insert (PBO) placed bilaterally. Subjects underwent repetitive conjunctival allergen challenges (CAC) across 30 days and were assessed for changes in AC signs and symptoms. The primary endpoint was ocular itching score at 3, 5, and 7 minutes post-CAC at Day 8 (7 days post-insertion). This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04050865).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-six subjects were randomized (n=48 DEX, n=48 PBO). Compared to PBO, there were statistically significant treatment differences favoring DEX for the primary endpoint of mean ocular itching score at Day 8 (-0.86, -0.98, -0.96 at 3, 5, and 7 minutes post-CAC respectively; <i>P</i><0.0001 for all). Treatment differences favored DEX for all 24 time points across 6 visits and were statistically significant (<i>P</i><0.05) except for the first post-insertion (Day 7, 3 minutes). For the 18 time points at which conjunctival redness was assessed, DEX had lower scores than PBO (<i>P</i><0.05 for all). The most common ocular adverse events (AEs) in DEX subjects were eye discharge and irritation. No serious AEs, elevated intraocular pressure, dacryocanaliculitis, or use of rescue medications were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results of this study support the potential use of dexamethasone insert as a physician-administered, preservative-free treatment for AC, with significant improvements in ocular itching and conjunctival redness compared with placebo. The dexamethasone insert was generally safe with a favorable safety profile.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424686/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S476419\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S476419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估地塞米松关节腔内植入物(DEX)治疗过敏性结膜炎(AC)的有效性和安全性:在这项多中心、随机、双掩蔽、安慰剂对照的3期研究中,患有过敏性结膜炎的成人(≥18岁)按1:1的比例随机接受双侧放置地塞米松或安慰剂插入物(PBO)。受试者在30天内反复接受结膜过敏原挑战(CAC),并评估过敏体征和症状的变化。主要终点是第 8 天(放置后 7 天)CAC 后 3、5 和 7 分钟的眼部瘙痒评分。该试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04050865) 上注册:96名受试者接受了随机试验(DEX 48人,PBO 48人)。与 PBO 相比,在第 8 天的主要终点(CAC 后 3、5 和 7 分钟的平均眼部瘙痒评分分别为-0.86、-0.98、-0.96;PPP)上,DEX 的治疗差异具有统计学意义:与安慰剂相比,地塞米松插件能显著改善眼部瘙痒和结膜发红症状。地塞米松插件总体安全,安全性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Randomized, Multicenter Phase 3 Clinical Trial Evaluating Intracanalicular Dexamethasone Insert for the Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a dexamethasone intracanalicular insert (DEX) for treatment of allergic conjunctivitis (AC).

Patients and methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled phase 3 study, adults (≥18 years) with AC were randomized 1:1 to DEX or placebo insert (PBO) placed bilaterally. Subjects underwent repetitive conjunctival allergen challenges (CAC) across 30 days and were assessed for changes in AC signs and symptoms. The primary endpoint was ocular itching score at 3, 5, and 7 minutes post-CAC at Day 8 (7 days post-insertion). This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04050865).

Results: Ninety-six subjects were randomized (n=48 DEX, n=48 PBO). Compared to PBO, there were statistically significant treatment differences favoring DEX for the primary endpoint of mean ocular itching score at Day 8 (-0.86, -0.98, -0.96 at 3, 5, and 7 minutes post-CAC respectively; P<0.0001 for all). Treatment differences favored DEX for all 24 time points across 6 visits and were statistically significant (P<0.05) except for the first post-insertion (Day 7, 3 minutes). For the 18 time points at which conjunctival redness was assessed, DEX had lower scores than PBO (P<0.05 for all). The most common ocular adverse events (AEs) in DEX subjects were eye discharge and irritation. No serious AEs, elevated intraocular pressure, dacryocanaliculitis, or use of rescue medications were reported.

Conclusion: Results of this study support the potential use of dexamethasone insert as a physician-administered, preservative-free treatment for AC, with significant improvements in ocular itching and conjunctival redness compared with placebo. The dexamethasone insert was generally safe with a favorable safety profile.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信