利用多回波 ICA 对运动任务 fMRI 数据中与任务相关的头部运动进行去噪。

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-05 DOI:10.1162/imag_a_00057
Neha A Reddy, Kristina M Zvolanek, Stefano Moia, César Caballero-Gaudes, Molly G Bright
{"title":"利用多回波 ICA 对运动任务 fMRI 数据中与任务相关的头部运动进行去噪。","authors":"Neha A Reddy, Kristina M Zvolanek, Stefano Moia, César Caballero-Gaudes, Molly G Bright","doi":"10.1162/imag_a_00057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Motor-task functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is crucial in the study of several clinical conditions, including stroke and Parkinson's disease. However, motor-task fMRI is complicated by task-correlated head motion, which can be magnified in clinical populations and confounds motor activation results. One method that may mitigate this issue is multi-echo independent component analysis (ME-ICA), which has been shown to separate the effects of head motion from the desired blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal but has not been tested in motor-task datasets with high amounts of motion. In this study, we collected an fMRI dataset from a healthy population who performed a hand grasp task with and without task-correlated amplified head motion to simulate a motor-impaired population. We analyzed these data using three models: single-echo (SE), multi-echo optimally combined (ME-OC), and ME-ICA. We compared the models' performance in mitigating the effects of head motion on the subject level and group level. On the subject level, ME-ICA better dissociated the effects of head motion from the BOLD signal and reduced noise. Both ME models led to increased t-statistics in brain motor regions. In scans with high levels of motion, ME-ICA additionally mitigated artifacts and increased stability of beta coefficient estimates, compared to SE. On the group level, all three models produced activation clusters in expected motor areas in scans with both low and high motion, indicating that group-level averaging may also sufficiently resolve motion artifacts that vary by subject. These findings demonstrate that ME-ICA is a useful tool for subject-level analysis of motor-task data with high levels of task-correlated head motion. The improvements afforded by ME-ICA are critical to improve reliability of subject-level activation maps for clinical populations in which group-level analysis may not be feasible or appropriate, for example, in a chronic stroke cohort with varying stroke location and degree of tissue damage.</p>","PeriodicalId":73341,"journal":{"name":"Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)","volume":"2 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Denoising task-correlated head motion from motor-task fMRI data with multi-echo ICA.\",\"authors\":\"Neha A Reddy, Kristina M Zvolanek, Stefano Moia, César Caballero-Gaudes, Molly G Bright\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/imag_a_00057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Motor-task functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is crucial in the study of several clinical conditions, including stroke and Parkinson's disease. However, motor-task fMRI is complicated by task-correlated head motion, which can be magnified in clinical populations and confounds motor activation results. One method that may mitigate this issue is multi-echo independent component analysis (ME-ICA), which has been shown to separate the effects of head motion from the desired blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal but has not been tested in motor-task datasets with high amounts of motion. In this study, we collected an fMRI dataset from a healthy population who performed a hand grasp task with and without task-correlated amplified head motion to simulate a motor-impaired population. We analyzed these data using three models: single-echo (SE), multi-echo optimally combined (ME-OC), and ME-ICA. We compared the models' performance in mitigating the effects of head motion on the subject level and group level. On the subject level, ME-ICA better dissociated the effects of head motion from the BOLD signal and reduced noise. Both ME models led to increased t-statistics in brain motor regions. In scans with high levels of motion, ME-ICA additionally mitigated artifacts and increased stability of beta coefficient estimates, compared to SE. On the group level, all three models produced activation clusters in expected motor areas in scans with both low and high motion, indicating that group-level averaging may also sufficiently resolve motion artifacts that vary by subject. These findings demonstrate that ME-ICA is a useful tool for subject-level analysis of motor-task data with high levels of task-correlated head motion. The improvements afforded by ME-ICA are critical to improve reliability of subject-level activation maps for clinical populations in which group-level analysis may not be feasible or appropriate, for example, in a chronic stroke cohort with varying stroke location and degree of tissue damage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426116/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/imag_a_00057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/imag_a_00057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

运动任务功能磁共振成像(fMRI)对中风和帕金森病等多种临床疾病的研究至关重要。然而,运动任务 fMRI 因与任务相关的头部运动而变得复杂,这种运动在临床人群中会被放大,并干扰运动激活结果。多回波独立分量分析(ME-ICA)是一种可以缓解这一问题的方法,该方法已被证明可以将头部运动的影响从所需的血氧饱和度依赖(BOLD)信号中分离出来,但尚未在具有大量运动的运动任务数据集中进行过测试。在这项研究中,我们从健康人群中收集了一个 fMRI 数据集,这些人在执行手部抓握任务时,头部会发生和不发生与任务相关的放大运动,以模拟运动受损人群。我们使用三种模型分析了这些数据:单回波(SE)、多回波优化组合(ME-OC)和 ME-ICA。我们比较了这些模型在减轻受试者和群体头部运动影响方面的性能。在受试者层面,ME-ICA 更好地将头部运动的影响从 BOLD 信号中分离出来,并减少了噪音。两种 ME 模型都提高了大脑运动区域的 t 统计量。与 SE 相比,在高运动扫描中,ME-ICA 还能减少伪影并提高贝塔系数估计值的稳定性。在组水平上,所有三种模型都能在低运动和高运动扫描中产生预期运动区域的激活集群,这表明组水平平均也能充分解决因受试者而异的运动伪影。这些研究结果表明,ME-ICA 是一种有用的工具,可用于对具有高水平任务相关头部运动的运动任务数据进行受试者级别的分析。ME-ICA 带来的改进对于提高受试者水平激活图的可靠性至关重要,因为在临床人群中,组水平分析可能不可行或不合适,例如,在中风位置和组织损伤程度不同的慢性中风队列中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Denoising task-correlated head motion from motor-task fMRI data with multi-echo ICA.

Motor-task functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is crucial in the study of several clinical conditions, including stroke and Parkinson's disease. However, motor-task fMRI is complicated by task-correlated head motion, which can be magnified in clinical populations and confounds motor activation results. One method that may mitigate this issue is multi-echo independent component analysis (ME-ICA), which has been shown to separate the effects of head motion from the desired blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal but has not been tested in motor-task datasets with high amounts of motion. In this study, we collected an fMRI dataset from a healthy population who performed a hand grasp task with and without task-correlated amplified head motion to simulate a motor-impaired population. We analyzed these data using three models: single-echo (SE), multi-echo optimally combined (ME-OC), and ME-ICA. We compared the models' performance in mitigating the effects of head motion on the subject level and group level. On the subject level, ME-ICA better dissociated the effects of head motion from the BOLD signal and reduced noise. Both ME models led to increased t-statistics in brain motor regions. In scans with high levels of motion, ME-ICA additionally mitigated artifacts and increased stability of beta coefficient estimates, compared to SE. On the group level, all three models produced activation clusters in expected motor areas in scans with both low and high motion, indicating that group-level averaging may also sufficiently resolve motion artifacts that vary by subject. These findings demonstrate that ME-ICA is a useful tool for subject-level analysis of motor-task data with high levels of task-correlated head motion. The improvements afforded by ME-ICA are critical to improve reliability of subject-level activation maps for clinical populations in which group-level analysis may not be feasible or appropriate, for example, in a chronic stroke cohort with varying stroke location and degree of tissue damage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信