将循环白细胞介素作为非小细胞肺癌患者的生物标记物:与正常人相比的试点研究。

IF 2.9 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Wei-Wen Lim, Jason H Leung, Chen Xie, Angelina W T Cheng, Liping Su, Luh-Nah Lum, Aishah Toh, Siew-Ching Kong, Angela M Takano, Derek J Hausenloy, Yang C Chua
{"title":"将循环白细胞介素作为非小细胞肺癌患者的生物标记物:与正常人相比的试点研究。","authors":"Wei-Wen Lim, Jason H Leung, Chen Xie, Angelina W T Cheng, Liping Su, Luh-Nah Lum, Aishah Toh, Siew-Ching Kong, Angela M Takano, Derek J Hausenloy, Yang C Chua","doi":"10.3390/diseases12090221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can improve diagnosis and patient stratification. We evaluated plasmas and sera for interleukins (IL)-11, IL-6, IL-8, IL-17A, and IL-33 as biomarkers in primary NSCLC patients undergoing surgical treatment against normal volunteers. Exhaled-breath condensates (EBCs), a potential source without invasive procedures, were explored in normal individuals. Due to separate recruitment criteria and intrinsic cohort differences, the NSCLC and control cohorts were not well matched for age (median age: 65 vs. 40 years; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and smoking status (<i>p</i> = 0.0058). Interleukins were first assessed through conventional ELISA. IL-11 was elevated in NSCLC plasma compared to controls (49.71 ± 16.90 vs. 27.67 ± 14.06 pg/mL, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) but undetectable in sera and EBCs by conventional ELISA. Therefore, high-sensitivity PCR-based IL-11 ELISA was repeated, albeit with concentration discrepancies. IL11 gene and protein upregulation by RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry, respectively, were validated in NSCLC tumors. The lack of detection sensitivity across IL-6, IL-8, IL-17A, and IL-33 suggests the need for further, precise assays. Surprisingly, biomarker concentrations can be dissimilar across paired plasmas and sera. Our results identified a need to optimize detection limits for biomarker detection and caution against over-reliance on just one form of blood sample for biomarker assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":72832,"journal":{"name":"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11430979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Circulating Interleukins as Biomarkers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study Compared to Normal Individuals.\",\"authors\":\"Wei-Wen Lim, Jason H Leung, Chen Xie, Angelina W T Cheng, Liping Su, Luh-Nah Lum, Aishah Toh, Siew-Ching Kong, Angela M Takano, Derek J Hausenloy, Yang C Chua\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diseases12090221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Identifying biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can improve diagnosis and patient stratification. We evaluated plasmas and sera for interleukins (IL)-11, IL-6, IL-8, IL-17A, and IL-33 as biomarkers in primary NSCLC patients undergoing surgical treatment against normal volunteers. Exhaled-breath condensates (EBCs), a potential source without invasive procedures, were explored in normal individuals. Due to separate recruitment criteria and intrinsic cohort differences, the NSCLC and control cohorts were not well matched for age (median age: 65 vs. 40 years; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and smoking status (<i>p</i> = 0.0058). Interleukins were first assessed through conventional ELISA. IL-11 was elevated in NSCLC plasma compared to controls (49.71 ± 16.90 vs. 27.67 ± 14.06 pg/mL, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) but undetectable in sera and EBCs by conventional ELISA. Therefore, high-sensitivity PCR-based IL-11 ELISA was repeated, albeit with concentration discrepancies. IL11 gene and protein upregulation by RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry, respectively, were validated in NSCLC tumors. The lack of detection sensitivity across IL-6, IL-8, IL-17A, and IL-33 suggests the need for further, precise assays. Surprisingly, biomarker concentrations can be dissimilar across paired plasmas and sera. Our results identified a need to optimize detection limits for biomarker detection and caution against over-reliance on just one form of blood sample for biomarker assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11430979/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12090221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12090221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的生物标志物可以改善诊断和患者分层。我们对血浆和血清中的白细胞介素 (IL)-11、IL-6、IL-8、IL-17A 和 IL-33 进行了评估,将其作为接受手术治疗的原发性 NSCLC 患者和正常志愿者的生物标记物。呼出气体冷凝物(EBC)是一种无需侵入性程序的潜在来源,在正常人中进行了研究。由于招募标准不同和队列的内在差异,NSCLC 队列和对照队列在年龄(中位年龄:65 岁对 40 岁;p < 0.0001)和吸烟状况(p = 0.0058)方面并不完全匹配。白细胞介素首先通过传统的 ELISA 方法进行评估。与对照组相比,NSCLC血浆中的IL-11升高(分别为49.71 ± 16.90 pg/mL vs. 27.67 ± 14.06 pg/mL,p < 0.0001),但通过传统的ELISA方法,血清和EBC中检测不到IL-11。因此,再次采用基于 PCR 的高灵敏度 IL-11 酶联免疫吸附试验,尽管浓度存在差异。通过 RT-qPCR 和免疫组化分别验证了 IL11 基因和蛋白在 NSCLC 肿瘤中的上调。IL-6、IL-8、IL-17A 和 IL-33 的检测灵敏度不足,这表明需要进一步的精确测定。令人惊讶的是,配对血浆和血清中的生物标记物浓度可能不同。我们的研究结果表明,有必要优化生物标记物检测的检测限,并告诫人们不要过度依赖一种形式的血液样本来进行生物标记物评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Circulating Interleukins as Biomarkers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study Compared to Normal Individuals.

Identifying biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can improve diagnosis and patient stratification. We evaluated plasmas and sera for interleukins (IL)-11, IL-6, IL-8, IL-17A, and IL-33 as biomarkers in primary NSCLC patients undergoing surgical treatment against normal volunteers. Exhaled-breath condensates (EBCs), a potential source without invasive procedures, were explored in normal individuals. Due to separate recruitment criteria and intrinsic cohort differences, the NSCLC and control cohorts were not well matched for age (median age: 65 vs. 40 years; p < 0.0001) and smoking status (p = 0.0058). Interleukins were first assessed through conventional ELISA. IL-11 was elevated in NSCLC plasma compared to controls (49.71 ± 16.90 vs. 27.67 ± 14.06 pg/mL, respectively, p < 0.0001) but undetectable in sera and EBCs by conventional ELISA. Therefore, high-sensitivity PCR-based IL-11 ELISA was repeated, albeit with concentration discrepancies. IL11 gene and protein upregulation by RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry, respectively, were validated in NSCLC tumors. The lack of detection sensitivity across IL-6, IL-8, IL-17A, and IL-33 suggests the need for further, precise assays. Surprisingly, biomarker concentrations can be dissimilar across paired plasmas and sera. Our results identified a need to optimize detection limits for biomarker detection and caution against over-reliance on just one form of blood sample for biomarker assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信