[玻璃体黄斑牵引和黄斑孔的当前治疗策略:德国视网膜专家调查]。

Die Ophthalmologie Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1007/s00347-024-02118-1
D Vogt, C Haritoglou, V Nicoletti, F C Kortuem, V Deiters, H Hoerauf, A Wolf, R G Schumann
{"title":"[玻璃体黄斑牵引和黄斑孔的当前治疗策略:德国视网膜专家调查]。","authors":"D Vogt, C Haritoglou, V Nicoletti, F C Kortuem, V Deiters, H Hoerauf, A Wolf, R G Schumann","doi":"10.1007/s00347-024-02118-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the different treatment strategies for eyes with vitreomacular traction (VMT) and macular holes (MF) regarding the indications and initiation of treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to facilitate clinical decision making by presenting the opinions of experienced retinal specialists in the context of the current literature and the changed approval situation for ocriplasmin.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Members of the German Retina Society (RG) were questioned in an online survey. Based on a literature review a 100-question questionnaire was created and sent to all members of the RG via an electronic link to the online platform \"LimeSurvey\". Voluntary participation was possible from 15 October 2021 to 15 November 2021. Data collection and statistical analysis were anonymized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The responses of the 115 participants were congruent with the presentation of the new S1 guidelines on this topic. The indications for active treatment of focal VMT without MF were postponed in favor of watchful waiting, with the individual symptoms of the patient playing a major role in the proposed temporal management. The results on the indications for vitrectomy are consistent and convincingly confirm the opinions on the efficacy and risk assessment of this therapeutic procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results presented provide an overview of the consensus and controversies in the current treatment options for VMT and MF. With the help of a homogeneous and experienced group of retinal experts, it was possible to develop individual treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72808,"journal":{"name":"Die Ophthalmologie","volume":" ","pages":"973-984"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Current treatment strategies for vitreomacular traction and macular holes: a survey of retinal specialists in Germany].\",\"authors\":\"D Vogt, C Haritoglou, V Nicoletti, F C Kortuem, V Deiters, H Hoerauf, A Wolf, R G Schumann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00347-024-02118-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the different treatment strategies for eyes with vitreomacular traction (VMT) and macular holes (MF) regarding the indications and initiation of treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to facilitate clinical decision making by presenting the opinions of experienced retinal specialists in the context of the current literature and the changed approval situation for ocriplasmin.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Members of the German Retina Society (RG) were questioned in an online survey. Based on a literature review a 100-question questionnaire was created and sent to all members of the RG via an electronic link to the online platform \\\"LimeSurvey\\\". Voluntary participation was possible from 15 October 2021 to 15 November 2021. Data collection and statistical analysis were anonymized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The responses of the 115 participants were congruent with the presentation of the new S1 guidelines on this topic. The indications for active treatment of focal VMT without MF were postponed in favor of watchful waiting, with the individual symptoms of the patient playing a major role in the proposed temporal management. The results on the indications for vitrectomy are consistent and convincingly confirm the opinions on the efficacy and risk assessment of this therapeutic procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results presented provide an overview of the consensus and controversies in the current treatment options for VMT and MF. With the help of a homogeneous and experienced group of retinal experts, it was possible to develop individual treatment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Die Ophthalmologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"973-984\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Die Ophthalmologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-024-02118-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Ophthalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-024-02118-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:评估玻璃体粘膜牵引(VMT)和黄斑孔(MF)患者在适应症和开始治疗方面的不同治疗策略:目的:评估玻璃体粘膜牵引(VMT)和黄斑孔(MF)患者在适应症和开始治疗方面的不同治疗策略:本研究的目的是根据目前的文献和奥曲肽批准情况的变化,介绍经验丰富的视网膜专家的意见,以促进临床决策:通过在线调查询问了德国视网膜学会(RG)的成员。在文献综述的基础上,我们制作了一份包含 100 个问题的调查问卷,并通过在线平台 "LimeSurvey "的电子链接发送给德国视网膜学会的所有会员。自愿参与时间为 2021 年 10 月 15 日至 2021 年 11 月 15 日。数据收集和统计分析均采用匿名方式:结果:115 位参与者的回答与新的 S1 指南对这一主题的表述一致。无中耳炎的局灶性 VMT 的积极治疗指征被推迟,转为观察等待,患者的个体症状在建议的时间管理中发挥了重要作用。关于玻璃体切除术适应症的结果是一致的,并令人信服地证实了关于这种治疗方法的疗效和风险评估的观点:研究结果概述了目前治疗 VMT 和 MF 方案的共识和争议。在同一批经验丰富的视网膜专家的帮助下,制定个性化的治疗策略成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Current treatment strategies for vitreomacular traction and macular holes: a survey of retinal specialists in Germany].

Background: To evaluate the different treatment strategies for eyes with vitreomacular traction (VMT) and macular holes (MF) regarding the indications and initiation of treatment.

Objective: The aim of this study is to facilitate clinical decision making by presenting the opinions of experienced retinal specialists in the context of the current literature and the changed approval situation for ocriplasmin.

Material and methods: Members of the German Retina Society (RG) were questioned in an online survey. Based on a literature review a 100-question questionnaire was created and sent to all members of the RG via an electronic link to the online platform "LimeSurvey". Voluntary participation was possible from 15 October 2021 to 15 November 2021. Data collection and statistical analysis were anonymized.

Results: The responses of the 115 participants were congruent with the presentation of the new S1 guidelines on this topic. The indications for active treatment of focal VMT without MF were postponed in favor of watchful waiting, with the individual symptoms of the patient playing a major role in the proposed temporal management. The results on the indications for vitrectomy are consistent and convincingly confirm the opinions on the efficacy and risk assessment of this therapeutic procedure.

Conclusion: The results presented provide an overview of the consensus and controversies in the current treatment options for VMT and MF. With the help of a homogeneous and experienced group of retinal experts, it was possible to develop individual treatment strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信