对多重耐药菌实施标准化标准:对停止 ESBL 接触预防措施的成本规避进行回顾性分析。

Brenna Crossley, Carmen T Cortes-Ramos, Dawn Nolt
{"title":"对多重耐药菌实施标准化标准:对停止 ESBL 接触预防措施的成本规避进行回顾性分析。","authors":"Brenna Crossley, Carmen T Cortes-Ramos, Dawn Nolt","doi":"10.1017/ash.2024.351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This manuscript calculates the estimated cost-savings associated with implementing criteria for multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study evaluated extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing <i>Enterobacterales</i> isolates utilizing the MDRO criteria established by Infection Prevention and Control. Isolates were categorized as either meeting or not meeting criteria. The number of inpatient days for patients with isolates not meeting criteria was calculated. The average daily cost of personal protective equipment (PPE) for patients in contact isolation was determined via literature review. Annual cost savings were determined by multiplying the total number of inpatient days by the average cost of PPE per day. Because our institution only isolates patients who meet the MDRO criteria, this approach was considered a cost-saving measure.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>560 licensed bed, tertiary care facility in the United States.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult inpatients between the years of 2019-2022 with an ESBL-producing <i>Enterobacterales</i> isolated from any specimen source.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>229 patients met inclusion criteria. 73% of isolates did not meet MDRO criteria. The patients with ESBL isolates not meeting criteria represented 2942 isolation days over four years. The average cost of PPE for contact isolation per day was $40.18. Cost-savings were estimated at $118,209 over four years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings provide support for other healthcare systems to define organisms that warrant transmission-based contact precautions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing standardized criteria for multi-drug-resistant organisms: a retrospective cost-avoidance analysis for discontinuing contact precautions for ESBL.\",\"authors\":\"Brenna Crossley, Carmen T Cortes-Ramos, Dawn Nolt\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ash.2024.351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This manuscript calculates the estimated cost-savings associated with implementing criteria for multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study evaluated extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing <i>Enterobacterales</i> isolates utilizing the MDRO criteria established by Infection Prevention and Control. Isolates were categorized as either meeting or not meeting criteria. The number of inpatient days for patients with isolates not meeting criteria was calculated. The average daily cost of personal protective equipment (PPE) for patients in contact isolation was determined via literature review. Annual cost savings were determined by multiplying the total number of inpatient days by the average cost of PPE per day. Because our institution only isolates patients who meet the MDRO criteria, this approach was considered a cost-saving measure.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>560 licensed bed, tertiary care facility in the United States.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult inpatients between the years of 2019-2022 with an ESBL-producing <i>Enterobacterales</i> isolated from any specimen source.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>229 patients met inclusion criteria. 73% of isolates did not meet MDRO criteria. The patients with ESBL isolates not meeting criteria represented 2942 isolation days over four years. The average cost of PPE for contact isolation per day was $40.18. Cost-savings were estimated at $118,209 over four years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings provide support for other healthcare systems to define organisms that warrant transmission-based contact precautions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427955/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2024.351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2024.351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本手稿计算了实施多重耐药菌(MDRO)标准所能节省的成本:本稿件计算了实施多重耐药菌(MDRO)标准估计可节约的成本:设计:本研究根据感染预防与控制部门制定的 MDRO 标准,对产生广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的肠杆菌分离物进行了评估。分离物被分为符合标准和不符合标准两种。计算了分离物不符合标准的患者的住院天数。通过文献查阅确定了接触隔离患者个人防护设备 (PPE) 的日平均成本。将住院总天数乘以个人防护设备的日平均成本,得出每年可节约的成本。由于我院只隔离符合 MDRO 标准的患者,因此这种方法被认为是一种节约成本的措施:环境:美国拥有 560 张执照病床的三级医疗机构:结果:229 名患者符合纳入标准。73%的分离物不符合MDRO标准。ESBL分离物不符合标准的患者在四年中的隔离天数为2942天。每天用于接触隔离的个人防护设备的平均成本为 40.18 美元。估计四年内可节约成本 118,209 美元:我们的研究结果为其他医疗系统定义需要采取基于传播的接触预防措施的微生物提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing standardized criteria for multi-drug-resistant organisms: a retrospective cost-avoidance analysis for discontinuing contact precautions for ESBL.

Objective: This manuscript calculates the estimated cost-savings associated with implementing criteria for multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO).

Design: The study evaluated extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacterales isolates utilizing the MDRO criteria established by Infection Prevention and Control. Isolates were categorized as either meeting or not meeting criteria. The number of inpatient days for patients with isolates not meeting criteria was calculated. The average daily cost of personal protective equipment (PPE) for patients in contact isolation was determined via literature review. Annual cost savings were determined by multiplying the total number of inpatient days by the average cost of PPE per day. Because our institution only isolates patients who meet the MDRO criteria, this approach was considered a cost-saving measure.

Setting: 560 licensed bed, tertiary care facility in the United States.

Patients: Adult inpatients between the years of 2019-2022 with an ESBL-producing Enterobacterales isolated from any specimen source.

Results: 229 patients met inclusion criteria. 73% of isolates did not meet MDRO criteria. The patients with ESBL isolates not meeting criteria represented 2942 isolation days over four years. The average cost of PPE for contact isolation per day was $40.18. Cost-savings were estimated at $118,209 over four years.

Conclusions: Our findings provide support for other healthcare systems to define organisms that warrant transmission-based contact precautions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信