执行功能和认知变量对分心任务中实验性急性疼痛感知的影响:对无症状无疼痛者的研究

IF 3.2 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Life-Basel Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.3390/life14091141
Angela Tejera-Alonso, Francisco G Fernández-Palacios, Juan C Pacho-Hernández, Arvin Naeimi, Ana I de-la-Llave-Rincón, Silvia Ambite-Quesada, Ricardo Ortega-Santiago, César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, Margarita Cigarán-Mendez
{"title":"执行功能和认知变量对分心任务中实验性急性疼痛感知的影响:对无症状无疼痛者的研究","authors":"Angela Tejera-Alonso, Francisco G Fernández-Palacios, Juan C Pacho-Hernández, Arvin Naeimi, Ana I de-la-Llave-Rincón, Silvia Ambite-Quesada, Ricardo Ortega-Santiago, César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, Margarita Cigarán-Mendez","doi":"10.3390/life14091141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of executive functioning and cognitive performance on individual experimentally induced pain perception during distractor tasks in an asymptomatic pain-free population. A total of 59 healthy pain-free subjects (59.3% women, mean age: 46.5 ± 24.7 years) completed a battery test that assessed execution functions (cognitive flexibility, working memory, mental inhibition), attention level, and psychological aspects (anxiety/depressive levels-HADS, pain catastrophizing-PCS, pain anxiety symptoms-PASS 20, sleep quality-PSQI) before conducting two n-back distraction tasks. Pain was experimentally induced with a thermal stimulus that was able to induce moderate pain (70/100 points) and applied to the non-dominant forearm. The thermal stimulus was applied before and during both (one-back and two-back) distraction tasks. The analyses consisted of separated repeated-measures ANOVA that considered the functioning on each test (cognitive flexibility, working memory, mental inhibition, selective attention) and controlled for sociodemographic and psychological aspects by comparing the pain intensity at the baseline and during the one-back and two-back distractor tasks. All ANOVAs found a significant effect of the distraction task, which indicates that the perceived pain intensity scores were lower during the one-back and two-back tasks (<i>p</i> < 0.001) as compared with the baseline. No interaction effect between the distractor tasks and working memory (<i>p</i> = 0.546), mental inhibition (<i>p</i> = 0.16), cognitive flexibility (<i>p</i> = 0.069), or selective attention (<i>p</i> = 0.105) was identified. The current study found that a distraction task decreased the perceived intensity of experimentally induced pain in asymptomatic pain-free individuals and that this effect was not related to executive function or attention levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":56144,"journal":{"name":"Life-Basel","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11433093/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Executive Functions and Cognitive Variables in Experimentally Induced Acute Pain Perception during a Distraction Task: A Study on Asymptomatic Pain-Free Individuals.\",\"authors\":\"Angela Tejera-Alonso, Francisco G Fernández-Palacios, Juan C Pacho-Hernández, Arvin Naeimi, Ana I de-la-Llave-Rincón, Silvia Ambite-Quesada, Ricardo Ortega-Santiago, César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, Margarita Cigarán-Mendez\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/life14091141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of executive functioning and cognitive performance on individual experimentally induced pain perception during distractor tasks in an asymptomatic pain-free population. A total of 59 healthy pain-free subjects (59.3% women, mean age: 46.5 ± 24.7 years) completed a battery test that assessed execution functions (cognitive flexibility, working memory, mental inhibition), attention level, and psychological aspects (anxiety/depressive levels-HADS, pain catastrophizing-PCS, pain anxiety symptoms-PASS 20, sleep quality-PSQI) before conducting two n-back distraction tasks. Pain was experimentally induced with a thermal stimulus that was able to induce moderate pain (70/100 points) and applied to the non-dominant forearm. The thermal stimulus was applied before and during both (one-back and two-back) distraction tasks. The analyses consisted of separated repeated-measures ANOVA that considered the functioning on each test (cognitive flexibility, working memory, mental inhibition, selective attention) and controlled for sociodemographic and psychological aspects by comparing the pain intensity at the baseline and during the one-back and two-back distractor tasks. All ANOVAs found a significant effect of the distraction task, which indicates that the perceived pain intensity scores were lower during the one-back and two-back tasks (<i>p</i> < 0.001) as compared with the baseline. No interaction effect between the distractor tasks and working memory (<i>p</i> = 0.546), mental inhibition (<i>p</i> = 0.16), cognitive flexibility (<i>p</i> = 0.069), or selective attention (<i>p</i> = 0.105) was identified. The current study found that a distraction task decreased the perceived intensity of experimentally induced pain in asymptomatic pain-free individuals and that this effect was not related to executive function or attention levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Life-Basel\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11433093/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Life-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/life14091141\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/life14091141","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是在无症状无疼痛的人群中调查执行功能和认知能力对实验诱发的疼痛感的影响。共有 59 名健康的无痛受试者(59.3% 为女性,平均年龄:46.5 ± 24.7 岁)在进行两项 n-back 分散任务前完成了一项电池测试,该测试评估了执行功能(认知灵活性、工作记忆、心理抑制)、注意力水平和心理方面(焦虑/抑郁水平-HADS、疼痛灾难化-PCS、疼痛焦虑症状-PASS 20、睡眠质量-PSQI)。疼痛是通过热刺激实验诱发的,热刺激可诱发中度疼痛(70/100 分),并作用于非主导前臂。热刺激在两次(单后背和双后背)分散注意力任务之前和过程中均有作用。分析包括单独的重复测量方差分析,该方差分析考虑了各项测试的功能(认知灵活性、工作记忆、心理抑制、选择性注意),并通过比较基线时以及单向和双向分散注意力任务期间的疼痛强度,控制了社会人口学和心理学方面的因素。所有方差分析均发现分散注意力任务有显著影响,这表明与基线相比,单向后和双向后任务期间的感知疼痛强度得分较低(p < 0.001)。分散注意力任务与工作记忆(p = 0.546)、心理抑制(p = 0.16)、认知灵活性(p = 0.069)或选择性注意(p = 0.105)之间未发现交互效应。本研究发现,分散注意力任务可降低无症状无疼痛者对实验诱发疼痛的感知强度,而且这种效应与执行功能或注意力水平无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Executive Functions and Cognitive Variables in Experimentally Induced Acute Pain Perception during a Distraction Task: A Study on Asymptomatic Pain-Free Individuals.

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of executive functioning and cognitive performance on individual experimentally induced pain perception during distractor tasks in an asymptomatic pain-free population. A total of 59 healthy pain-free subjects (59.3% women, mean age: 46.5 ± 24.7 years) completed a battery test that assessed execution functions (cognitive flexibility, working memory, mental inhibition), attention level, and psychological aspects (anxiety/depressive levels-HADS, pain catastrophizing-PCS, pain anxiety symptoms-PASS 20, sleep quality-PSQI) before conducting two n-back distraction tasks. Pain was experimentally induced with a thermal stimulus that was able to induce moderate pain (70/100 points) and applied to the non-dominant forearm. The thermal stimulus was applied before and during both (one-back and two-back) distraction tasks. The analyses consisted of separated repeated-measures ANOVA that considered the functioning on each test (cognitive flexibility, working memory, mental inhibition, selective attention) and controlled for sociodemographic and psychological aspects by comparing the pain intensity at the baseline and during the one-back and two-back distractor tasks. All ANOVAs found a significant effect of the distraction task, which indicates that the perceived pain intensity scores were lower during the one-back and two-back tasks (p < 0.001) as compared with the baseline. No interaction effect between the distractor tasks and working memory (p = 0.546), mental inhibition (p = 0.16), cognitive flexibility (p = 0.069), or selective attention (p = 0.105) was identified. The current study found that a distraction task decreased the perceived intensity of experimentally induced pain in asymptomatic pain-free individuals and that this effect was not related to executive function or attention levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Life-Basel
Life-Basel Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1798
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Life (ISSN 2075-1729) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of scientific studies related to fundamental themes in Life Sciences, especially those concerned with the origins of life and evolution of biosystems. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信