简单的等待:自然语言处理在识别院内延误中的应用。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Daksh Tyagi, Sheryn Tan, Charis Tang, Joshua Kovoor, Aashray Gupta, WengOnn Chan, Samuel Gluck, Toby Gilbert, Andrew C. Zannettino, Patrick G. O'Callaghan, Stephen Bacchi
{"title":"简单的等待:自然语言处理在识别院内延误中的应用。","authors":"Daksh Tyagi,&nbsp;Sheryn Tan,&nbsp;Charis Tang,&nbsp;Joshua Kovoor,&nbsp;Aashray Gupta,&nbsp;WengOnn Chan,&nbsp;Samuel Gluck,&nbsp;Toby Gilbert,&nbsp;Andrew C. Zannettino,&nbsp;Patrick G. O'Callaghan,&nbsp;Stephen Bacchi","doi":"10.1111/hex.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We read with interest the study by Abdelhalim et al. (DOI:10.1111/hex.14050) that addressed the persistent challenge of delayed hospital discharge (DHD) by identifying its primary causes and emphasising the significance of effective communication and management in healthcare settings [<span>1</span>]. This has the effect of prolonging hospital stays, increasing costs, reducing capacity and poorer patient outcomes [<span>2-5</span>].</p><p>One of the main findings of the study is that poor communication—between hospitals, community health and social care providers, and within hospital departments—was consistently a factor in DHD [<span>1</span>]. Numerous articles highlighted the inadequate communication and coordination among hospital staff, patients and healthcare and community institutions acting as a significant obstacle to minimising DHD. Additionally, many research findings agreed that the primary cause of the DHD issue lies in hospital management, internal processes and inadequate coordination [<span>1</span>].</p><p>In line with this, we conducted a multicentre retrospective cohort study evaluating consecutive general medicine inpatient admissions to two metropolitan tertiary hospitals over a 2.5-year period using natural language processing (NLP) to evaluate documented discharge delays.</p><p>Our findings provide a South Australian inpatient general medicine complement to the 700 studies spanning the last 24 years analysed by Abdelhalim et al. Evaluation of 28,377 unique visits and associated 193,251 individual ward round notes suggested significant association between the use of a delay phrase (‘wait’ and ‘chase’) in a ward round note and greater length of stay (LOS). Among the individual hospital processes evaluated, the term ‘wait’ was frequently linked with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), whereas the term ‘chase’ was frequently linked with blood tests.</p><p>Our study demonstrated that it is feasible to use NLP on medical free text to gain insights into reasons associated with DHD. Patients who had ward round notes with specific delay phrases had longer LOS. This method can also be used to identify hospital processes that are frequently discussed in the context of these described delays. This type of analysis may present novel insights into aspects of the psychology of medical officers. Results that typically have a shorter turnaround time, such as blood and urine tests, were discussed more in the context of ‘chasing’, whereas other test results, such as MRI and CT, were more often discussed in the context of ‘waiting’.</p><p>Although the results of the study are novel, their utility has not yet been investigated. Some identified delays may not be amenable to change. However, there may be delays amenable to change in specific circumstances. For example, when an access-block crisis point is reached, a hospital system may respond by leveraging additional resources to overcome this situation. An automated and rapid evaluation of already described factors contributing to hospital delays for current inpatients may be able to direct such resources, such as extended access to radiological services.</p><p>Identification of the reasons behind DHD is absolutely crucial in streamlining the outflow, and by extension, the overall load of patients upon a hospital. One of the primary rationales behind conducting the scoping review by Abdelhalim et al. was to illustrate that rather than solely focusing efforts on capacity expansion, we should advocate for hospital management enhancements and interventions targeting foundational issues, such as social and transitional care support [<span>1</span>].</p><p>The study conducted by our research team further shows that there is a wide scope for research in this field. Further research may seek to examine the generalisability of these findings and methods to other specialties and centres. Studies examining the potential utility of this information should be considered. Such studies may seek to conduct a cross-sectional analysis at a time of increased healthcare demand to determine whether these methods may identify delays amenable to modification.</p><p>Similar to the findings of Abdelhalim et al., our results also highlight the need for increased research focus on the reasons behind DHD, as opposed to the current direction of funding, which is more focused on capacity expansion [<span>1</span>].</p><p><b>Daksh Tyagi:</b> conceptualisation, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, writing of the draft, writing–review and editing. <b>Sheryn Tan:</b> conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. <b>Charis Tang:</b> conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. <b>Joshua Kovoor:</b> conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. <b>Aashray Gupta:</b> conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. <b>WengOnn Chan:</b> formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. <b>Samuel Gluck:</b> conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. <b>Toby Gilbert:</b> formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. <b>Andrew C. Zannettino:</b> formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. <b>Patrick G. O'Callaghan:</b> conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. <b>Stephen Bacchi:</b> conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing.</p><p>The authors declare conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Simple Act of Waiting: Natural Language Processing in the Identification of In-Hospital Delays\",\"authors\":\"Daksh Tyagi,&nbsp;Sheryn Tan,&nbsp;Charis Tang,&nbsp;Joshua Kovoor,&nbsp;Aashray Gupta,&nbsp;WengOnn Chan,&nbsp;Samuel Gluck,&nbsp;Toby Gilbert,&nbsp;Andrew C. Zannettino,&nbsp;Patrick G. O'Callaghan,&nbsp;Stephen Bacchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hex.70017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We read with interest the study by Abdelhalim et al. (DOI:10.1111/hex.14050) that addressed the persistent challenge of delayed hospital discharge (DHD) by identifying its primary causes and emphasising the significance of effective communication and management in healthcare settings [<span>1</span>]. This has the effect of prolonging hospital stays, increasing costs, reducing capacity and poorer patient outcomes [<span>2-5</span>].</p><p>One of the main findings of the study is that poor communication—between hospitals, community health and social care providers, and within hospital departments—was consistently a factor in DHD [<span>1</span>]. Numerous articles highlighted the inadequate communication and coordination among hospital staff, patients and healthcare and community institutions acting as a significant obstacle to minimising DHD. Additionally, many research findings agreed that the primary cause of the DHD issue lies in hospital management, internal processes and inadequate coordination [<span>1</span>].</p><p>In line with this, we conducted a multicentre retrospective cohort study evaluating consecutive general medicine inpatient admissions to two metropolitan tertiary hospitals over a 2.5-year period using natural language processing (NLP) to evaluate documented discharge delays.</p><p>Our findings provide a South Australian inpatient general medicine complement to the 700 studies spanning the last 24 years analysed by Abdelhalim et al. Evaluation of 28,377 unique visits and associated 193,251 individual ward round notes suggested significant association between the use of a delay phrase (‘wait’ and ‘chase’) in a ward round note and greater length of stay (LOS). Among the individual hospital processes evaluated, the term ‘wait’ was frequently linked with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), whereas the term ‘chase’ was frequently linked with blood tests.</p><p>Our study demonstrated that it is feasible to use NLP on medical free text to gain insights into reasons associated with DHD. Patients who had ward round notes with specific delay phrases had longer LOS. This method can also be used to identify hospital processes that are frequently discussed in the context of these described delays. This type of analysis may present novel insights into aspects of the psychology of medical officers. Results that typically have a shorter turnaround time, such as blood and urine tests, were discussed more in the context of ‘chasing’, whereas other test results, such as MRI and CT, were more often discussed in the context of ‘waiting’.</p><p>Although the results of the study are novel, their utility has not yet been investigated. Some identified delays may not be amenable to change. However, there may be delays amenable to change in specific circumstances. For example, when an access-block crisis point is reached, a hospital system may respond by leveraging additional resources to overcome this situation. An automated and rapid evaluation of already described factors contributing to hospital delays for current inpatients may be able to direct such resources, such as extended access to radiological services.</p><p>Identification of the reasons behind DHD is absolutely crucial in streamlining the outflow, and by extension, the overall load of patients upon a hospital. One of the primary rationales behind conducting the scoping review by Abdelhalim et al. was to illustrate that rather than solely focusing efforts on capacity expansion, we should advocate for hospital management enhancements and interventions targeting foundational issues, such as social and transitional care support [<span>1</span>].</p><p>The study conducted by our research team further shows that there is a wide scope for research in this field. Further research may seek to examine the generalisability of these findings and methods to other specialties and centres. Studies examining the potential utility of this information should be considered. Such studies may seek to conduct a cross-sectional analysis at a time of increased healthcare demand to determine whether these methods may identify delays amenable to modification.</p><p>Similar to the findings of Abdelhalim et al., our results also highlight the need for increased research focus on the reasons behind DHD, as opposed to the current direction of funding, which is more focused on capacity expansion [<span>1</span>].</p><p><b>Daksh Tyagi:</b> conceptualisation, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, writing of the draft, writing–review and editing. <b>Sheryn Tan:</b> conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. <b>Charis Tang:</b> conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. <b>Joshua Kovoor:</b> conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. <b>Aashray Gupta:</b> conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. <b>WengOnn Chan:</b> formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. <b>Samuel Gluck:</b> conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. <b>Toby Gilbert:</b> formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. <b>Andrew C. Zannettino:</b> formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. <b>Patrick G. O'Callaghan:</b> conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. <b>Stephen Bacchi:</b> conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing.</p><p>The authors declare conflicts of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Expectations\",\"volume\":\"27 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442310/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Expectations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70017\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们饶有兴趣地阅读了 Abdelhalim 等人的研究报告 (DOI:10.1111/hex.14050),该报告通过确定延迟出院 (DHD) 的主要原因并强调医疗机构有效沟通和管理的重要性,解决了延迟出院这一长期存在的难题 [1]。该研究的主要发现之一是,医院、社区卫生和社会医疗服务提供者之间以及医院各部门内部沟通不畅一直是导致延迟出院的一个因素[1]。许多文章都强调,医院员工、患者、医疗保健机构和社区机构之间沟通和协调不足,是最大限度减少危险性疾病的一大障碍。为此,我们开展了一项多中心回顾性队列研究,利用自然语言处理(NLP)技术对两家大都市三级医院在两年半的时间里连续收治的普通内科住院病人进行评估,以评估有记录的出院延迟情况。我们的研究结果为 Abdelhalim 等人在过去 24 年中分析的 700 项研究提供了南澳大利亚普通内科住院病人的补充。对 28,377 次独特就诊和相关的 193,251 份个人查房记录的评估表明,在查房记录中使用延迟短语("等待 "和 "追逐")与住院时间(LOS)延长之间存在显著关联。在所评估的单个医院流程中,"等待 "一词经常与磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层扫描(CT)联系在一起,而 "追逐 "一词则经常与血液化验联系在一起。查房记录中包含特定延迟短语的患者的生命周期较长。这种方法还可用于识别在描述这些延误时经常讨论的医院流程。这种分析可能会对医务人员的心理产生新的影响。通常周转时间较短的检查结果(如血液和尿液检查)更多地是在 "追逐 "的背景下被讨论,而其他检查结果(如核磁共振成像和 CT)则更多地是在 "等待 "的背景下被讨论。一些已发现的延误可能无法改变。然而,在特定情况下,有些延误是可以改变的。例如,当达到通道受阻的危机点时,医院系统可能会通过利用额外资源来应对这种情况。对已描述过的导致当前住院病人住院时间延误的因素进行自动快速评估,可能会引导此类资源的使用,例如延长放射服务的使用时间。Abdelhalim等人进行范围界定研究的主要目的之一是为了说明,我们不应只关注扩容,而应提倡加强医院管理,并针对社会和过渡护理支持等基础问题采取干预措施[1]。进一步的研究可以探讨这些发现和方法在其他专科和中心的通用性。应考虑对这些信息的潜在用途进行研究。与阿卜杜勒哈利姆等人的研究结果类似,我们的研究结果也突出表明,有必要加强对DHD背后原因的研究,而不是像目前的资助方向那样,将重点更多地放在能力扩张上[1]。Sheryn Tan:概念化、形式分析、调查、方法论、项目管理、监督、验证、撰写-审阅和编辑。Charis Tang:构思、形式分析、调查、方法论、项目管理、监督、验证、撰写-审阅和编辑。约书亚-科沃尔(Joshua Kovoor):构思、形式分析、调查、方法论、项目管理、监督、验证、撰写-审阅和编辑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Simple Act of Waiting: Natural Language Processing in the Identification of In-Hospital Delays

We read with interest the study by Abdelhalim et al. (DOI:10.1111/hex.14050) that addressed the persistent challenge of delayed hospital discharge (DHD) by identifying its primary causes and emphasising the significance of effective communication and management in healthcare settings [1]. This has the effect of prolonging hospital stays, increasing costs, reducing capacity and poorer patient outcomes [2-5].

One of the main findings of the study is that poor communication—between hospitals, community health and social care providers, and within hospital departments—was consistently a factor in DHD [1]. Numerous articles highlighted the inadequate communication and coordination among hospital staff, patients and healthcare and community institutions acting as a significant obstacle to minimising DHD. Additionally, many research findings agreed that the primary cause of the DHD issue lies in hospital management, internal processes and inadequate coordination [1].

In line with this, we conducted a multicentre retrospective cohort study evaluating consecutive general medicine inpatient admissions to two metropolitan tertiary hospitals over a 2.5-year period using natural language processing (NLP) to evaluate documented discharge delays.

Our findings provide a South Australian inpatient general medicine complement to the 700 studies spanning the last 24 years analysed by Abdelhalim et al. Evaluation of 28,377 unique visits and associated 193,251 individual ward round notes suggested significant association between the use of a delay phrase (‘wait’ and ‘chase’) in a ward round note and greater length of stay (LOS). Among the individual hospital processes evaluated, the term ‘wait’ was frequently linked with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), whereas the term ‘chase’ was frequently linked with blood tests.

Our study demonstrated that it is feasible to use NLP on medical free text to gain insights into reasons associated with DHD. Patients who had ward round notes with specific delay phrases had longer LOS. This method can also be used to identify hospital processes that are frequently discussed in the context of these described delays. This type of analysis may present novel insights into aspects of the psychology of medical officers. Results that typically have a shorter turnaround time, such as blood and urine tests, were discussed more in the context of ‘chasing’, whereas other test results, such as MRI and CT, were more often discussed in the context of ‘waiting’.

Although the results of the study are novel, their utility has not yet been investigated. Some identified delays may not be amenable to change. However, there may be delays amenable to change in specific circumstances. For example, when an access-block crisis point is reached, a hospital system may respond by leveraging additional resources to overcome this situation. An automated and rapid evaluation of already described factors contributing to hospital delays for current inpatients may be able to direct such resources, such as extended access to radiological services.

Identification of the reasons behind DHD is absolutely crucial in streamlining the outflow, and by extension, the overall load of patients upon a hospital. One of the primary rationales behind conducting the scoping review by Abdelhalim et al. was to illustrate that rather than solely focusing efforts on capacity expansion, we should advocate for hospital management enhancements and interventions targeting foundational issues, such as social and transitional care support [1].

The study conducted by our research team further shows that there is a wide scope for research in this field. Further research may seek to examine the generalisability of these findings and methods to other specialties and centres. Studies examining the potential utility of this information should be considered. Such studies may seek to conduct a cross-sectional analysis at a time of increased healthcare demand to determine whether these methods may identify delays amenable to modification.

Similar to the findings of Abdelhalim et al., our results also highlight the need for increased research focus on the reasons behind DHD, as opposed to the current direction of funding, which is more focused on capacity expansion [1].

Daksh Tyagi: conceptualisation, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, writing of the draft, writing–review and editing. Sheryn Tan: conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. Charis Tang: conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. Joshua Kovoor: conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. Aashray Gupta: conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. WengOnn Chan: formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. Samuel Gluck: conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. Toby Gilbert: formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. Andrew C. Zannettino: formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. Patrick G. O'Callaghan: conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. Stephen Bacchi: conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing–review and editing.

The authors declare conflicts of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信