医疗补助自 1965 年以来的政治发展:一个支离破碎且不平等的计划是如何发展壮大的?

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Colleen M Grogan
{"title":"医疗补助自 1965 年以来的政治发展:一个支离破碎且不平等的计划是如何发展壮大的?","authors":"Colleen M Grogan","doi":"10.1215/03616878-11567692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Medicaid program has changed enormously over the past 60 years from a very restrictive program primarily attached to recipients on public assistance in 1965 to a much more expansive program allowing coverage for persons regardless of marital, parental or employment status. Incorporating the 'medically needy'-an ambiguous concept from the start-allowed states to include many different groups in Medicaid who are not traditionally thought of as poor. In addition, three structural features illuminate why the program has expanded and changed dramatically over time: federalism and intergovernmental financing, the dominance of the private sector, and fragmentation. Unequal treatment among Medicaid covered groups alongside partisan politics create a political discourse that often reveals Medicaid as a public subsidy for stigmatized groups, while hiding Medicaid's reach into the middle-class. This central political ideological tension collides with programmatic realities such that Medicaid strangely often suffers from a residual, retrenchment politics while at the same time benefiting from embeddedness making it extremely difficult to truly turn back the clock on Medicaid's expansion.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medicaid's Political Development Since 1965: How a Fragmented and Unequal Program Has Expanded.\",\"authors\":\"Colleen M Grogan\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/03616878-11567692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Medicaid program has changed enormously over the past 60 years from a very restrictive program primarily attached to recipients on public assistance in 1965 to a much more expansive program allowing coverage for persons regardless of marital, parental or employment status. Incorporating the 'medically needy'-an ambiguous concept from the start-allowed states to include many different groups in Medicaid who are not traditionally thought of as poor. In addition, three structural features illuminate why the program has expanded and changed dramatically over time: federalism and intergovernmental financing, the dominance of the private sector, and fragmentation. Unequal treatment among Medicaid covered groups alongside partisan politics create a political discourse that often reveals Medicaid as a public subsidy for stigmatized groups, while hiding Medicaid's reach into the middle-class. This central political ideological tension collides with programmatic realities such that Medicaid strangely often suffers from a residual, retrenchment politics while at the same time benefiting from embeddedness making it extremely difficult to truly turn back the clock on Medicaid's expansion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-11567692\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-11567692","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗补助计划在过去的 60 年中发生了巨大变化,从 1965 年主要针对公共援助受助人的限制性很强的计划,发展到现在无论婚姻、父母或就业状况如何,均可享受的更为广泛的计划。从一开始,"有医疗需求者 "就是一个含糊不清的概念,它允许各州将许多传统上不被视为贫困人口的不同群体纳入《医疗补助计划》。此外,有三个结构性特征说明了为什么该计划随着时间的推移不断扩大并发生了巨大变化:联邦制和政府间融资、私营部门的主导地位以及分散化。医疗补助计划 "覆盖群体之间的不平等待遇与党派政治形成了一种政治论述,这种论述往往揭示出 "医疗补助计划 "是对被污名化群体的公共补贴,同时掩盖了 "医疗补助计划 "对中产阶级的影响。这种核心政治意识形态的张力与计划的现实相冲突,使得医疗补助计划奇怪地经常受到残余、紧缩政治的影响,同时又得益于嵌入性,使得医疗补助计划的扩展极难真正倒退。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medicaid's Political Development Since 1965: How a Fragmented and Unequal Program Has Expanded.

The Medicaid program has changed enormously over the past 60 years from a very restrictive program primarily attached to recipients on public assistance in 1965 to a much more expansive program allowing coverage for persons regardless of marital, parental or employment status. Incorporating the 'medically needy'-an ambiguous concept from the start-allowed states to include many different groups in Medicaid who are not traditionally thought of as poor. In addition, three structural features illuminate why the program has expanded and changed dramatically over time: federalism and intergovernmental financing, the dominance of the private sector, and fragmentation. Unequal treatment among Medicaid covered groups alongside partisan politics create a political discourse that often reveals Medicaid as a public subsidy for stigmatized groups, while hiding Medicaid's reach into the middle-class. This central political ideological tension collides with programmatic realities such that Medicaid strangely often suffers from a residual, retrenchment politics while at the same time benefiting from embeddedness making it extremely difficult to truly turn back the clock on Medicaid's expansion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信