评估超声引导下选择性颈神经根脉冲射频治疗对慢性颈椎根性疼痛患者的疗效。

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Ultrasound Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1007/s40477-024-00950-4
Ezgi Can, Ömer Taylan Akkaya
{"title":"评估超声引导下选择性颈神经根脉冲射频治疗对慢性颈椎根性疼痛患者的疗效。","authors":"Ezgi Can, Ömer Taylan Akkaya","doi":"10.1007/s40477-024-00950-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Management of cervical radicular pain is complex and may be resistant to conservative treatment. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided selective cervical nerve root pulsed radiofrequency (US-SCNR PRF) treatment in patients with radicular neck pain due to cervical disc herniation who did not respond to conservative treatment. The secondary aim was to determine the efficacy of the treatment in terms of functionality, neuropathic pain, and treatment-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 62 patients with chronic cervical radicular pain who underwent US-SCNR PRF treatment. Pain intensity was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale before treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. The Neck Disability Index and Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions were used to assess functionality and neuropathic pain before and 6 months after treatment. Significant pain relief was defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the pain score compared with the pre-treatment score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cervical radicular pain was significantly reduced at 1, 3, and 6 months after pulsed radiofrequency compared to pre-treatment (P < 0.001). Successful pain relief was achieved in 59.6% of the patients at 6 month. However, there was no significant difference between the mean pain scores in the 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month. In addition, the functionality and neuropathic pain scores were significantly reduced at 6 month.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that US-SCNR PRF treatment is effective for cervical radicular pain, functionality, and neuropathic pain for at least six months in the majority of patients with refractory cervical radicular pain, and is considered a safer and preferable treatment modality due to real-time visualization of the cervical nerve roots and adjacent neurovascular structures and no radiation exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":51528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":"847-855"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496453/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided selective cervical nerve root pulsed radiofrequency treatment in patients with chronic cervical radicular pain.\",\"authors\":\"Ezgi Can, Ömer Taylan Akkaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40477-024-00950-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Management of cervical radicular pain is complex and may be resistant to conservative treatment. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided selective cervical nerve root pulsed radiofrequency (US-SCNR PRF) treatment in patients with radicular neck pain due to cervical disc herniation who did not respond to conservative treatment. The secondary aim was to determine the efficacy of the treatment in terms of functionality, neuropathic pain, and treatment-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 62 patients with chronic cervical radicular pain who underwent US-SCNR PRF treatment. Pain intensity was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale before treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. The Neck Disability Index and Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions were used to assess functionality and neuropathic pain before and 6 months after treatment. Significant pain relief was defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the pain score compared with the pre-treatment score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cervical radicular pain was significantly reduced at 1, 3, and 6 months after pulsed radiofrequency compared to pre-treatment (P < 0.001). Successful pain relief was achieved in 59.6% of the patients at 6 month. However, there was no significant difference between the mean pain scores in the 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month. In addition, the functionality and neuropathic pain scores were significantly reduced at 6 month.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that US-SCNR PRF treatment is effective for cervical radicular pain, functionality, and neuropathic pain for at least six months in the majority of patients with refractory cervical radicular pain, and is considered a safer and preferable treatment modality due to real-time visualization of the cervical nerve roots and adjacent neurovascular structures and no radiation exposure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"847-855\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496453/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-024-00950-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-024-00950-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:颈椎根性疼痛的治疗非常复杂,而且可能对保守治疗产生耐药性。本研究的主要目的是评估超声引导下选择性颈神经根脉冲射频(US-SCNR PRF)治疗对保守治疗无效的颈椎间盘突出症引起的颈部根性疼痛患者的疗效。次要目的是确定治疗在功能、神经性疼痛和治疗相关不良事件方面的疗效:本研究纳入了 62 名接受 US-SCNR PRF 治疗的慢性颈椎根性疼痛患者。在治疗前和治疗后 1、3 和 6 个月,使用数字评分量表评估疼痛强度。颈部残疾指数和杜勒神经病理性 4 个问题用于评估治疗前和治疗后 6 个月的功能和神经病理性疼痛。与治疗前相比,疼痛评分降低≥50%即为疼痛明显缓解:结果:与治疗前相比,脉冲射频治疗后 1、3 和 6 个月的颈椎根性疼痛明显减轻(P 结论:脉冲射频治疗对颈椎根性疼痛有明显的缓解作用:这些结果表明,US-SCNR 脉冲射频治疗对大多数难治性颈椎根性疼痛患者的颈椎根性疼痛、功能性疼痛和神经病理性疼痛有效,至少可持续 6 个月,而且由于可实时观察颈神经根和邻近的神经血管结构,且无放射线暴露,因此被认为是一种更安全、更可取的治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided selective cervical nerve root pulsed radiofrequency treatment in patients with chronic cervical radicular pain.

Purpose: Management of cervical radicular pain is complex and may be resistant to conservative treatment. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided selective cervical nerve root pulsed radiofrequency (US-SCNR PRF) treatment in patients with radicular neck pain due to cervical disc herniation who did not respond to conservative treatment. The secondary aim was to determine the efficacy of the treatment in terms of functionality, neuropathic pain, and treatment-related adverse events.

Methods: This study included 62 patients with chronic cervical radicular pain who underwent US-SCNR PRF treatment. Pain intensity was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale before treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. The Neck Disability Index and Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions were used to assess functionality and neuropathic pain before and 6 months after treatment. Significant pain relief was defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the pain score compared with the pre-treatment score.

Results: Cervical radicular pain was significantly reduced at 1, 3, and 6 months after pulsed radiofrequency compared to pre-treatment (P < 0.001). Successful pain relief was achieved in 59.6% of the patients at 6 month. However, there was no significant difference between the mean pain scores in the 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month. In addition, the functionality and neuropathic pain scores were significantly reduced at 6 month.

Conclusions: These results suggest that US-SCNR PRF treatment is effective for cervical radicular pain, functionality, and neuropathic pain for at least six months in the majority of patients with refractory cervical radicular pain, and is considered a safer and preferable treatment modality due to real-time visualization of the cervical nerve roots and adjacent neurovascular structures and no radiation exposure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ultrasound
Journal of Ultrasound RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound is the official journal of the Italian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB). The journal publishes original contributions (research and review articles, case reports, technical reports and letters to the editor) on significant advances in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and in cross-sectional diagnostic imaging. The official language of Journal of Ultrasound is English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信