波多黎各儿童在认知评估系统中使用的策略及其与规划表现的关系。

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Giselle Cordero-Arroyo, José A Ramos-Carrasquillo, Imalay M Cruz-Figueroa, Loggina Báez-Ávila, Manuel Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Mary A Moreno-Torres, Mario E Bermonti-Pérez
{"title":"波多黎各儿童在认知评估系统中使用的策略及其与规划表现的关系。","authors":"Giselle Cordero-Arroyo, José A Ramos-Carrasquillo, Imalay M Cruz-Figueroa, Loggina Báez-Ávila, Manuel Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Mary A Moreno-Torres, Mario E Bermonti-Pérez","doi":"10.3390/jintelligence12090090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies involving the Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) planning scale typically use only the subtest and scale scores without assessing the strategies employed by the participants. This study addressed this gap and examined the planning strategies used by children in the CAS2: Spanish version and their relationship with planning performance. We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional study with 26 Puerto Rican children aged 8 to 11. Results showed that no strategies were consistently used by participants according to examinees' reports (<i>f</i> = 0-46%), but examiners observed consistent use of some strategies such as \"coded left to right, top to bottom\", <i>f</i> = 92%; \"scanned the page for the next number or letter\", <i>f</i> = 100%. Welch's <i>t</i>-tests did not show relationships between participants' performance and the strategies observed by examiners, | mean differences | = 0.05-0.81, <i>p</i>s ≥ 0.05, nor with the strategies reported by participants, | mean differences | = 0.05-1.69, <i>p</i>s ≥ 0.05. These findings suggest that although the examiners may observe the use of strategies, the examinees are unaware of the strategies they use, and the strategies used are not associated with their performance. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":52279,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intelligence","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11433149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies Used by Puerto Rican Children in the Cognitive Assessment System and Their Relationship with Planning Performance.\",\"authors\":\"Giselle Cordero-Arroyo, José A Ramos-Carrasquillo, Imalay M Cruz-Figueroa, Loggina Báez-Ávila, Manuel Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Mary A Moreno-Torres, Mario E Bermonti-Pérez\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jintelligence12090090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Studies involving the Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) planning scale typically use only the subtest and scale scores without assessing the strategies employed by the participants. This study addressed this gap and examined the planning strategies used by children in the CAS2: Spanish version and their relationship with planning performance. We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional study with 26 Puerto Rican children aged 8 to 11. Results showed that no strategies were consistently used by participants according to examinees' reports (<i>f</i> = 0-46%), but examiners observed consistent use of some strategies such as \\\"coded left to right, top to bottom\\\", <i>f</i> = 92%; \\\"scanned the page for the next number or letter\\\", <i>f</i> = 100%. Welch's <i>t</i>-tests did not show relationships between participants' performance and the strategies observed by examiners, | mean differences | = 0.05-0.81, <i>p</i>s ≥ 0.05, nor with the strategies reported by participants, | mean differences | = 0.05-1.69, <i>p</i>s ≥ 0.05. These findings suggest that although the examiners may observe the use of strategies, the examinees are unaware of the strategies they use, and the strategies used are not associated with their performance. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"12 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11433149/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12090090\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12090090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

涉及认知评估系统(CAS)规划量表的研究通常只使用分测验和量表分数,而不评估参与者使用的策略。本研究填补了这一空白,研究了儿童在 CAS2:西班牙语版中使用的规划策略及其与规划表现之间的关系。我们对 26 名 8 至 11 岁的波多黎各儿童进行了一项探索性横断面研究。结果显示,根据受试者的报告(f = 0-46%),受试者没有持续使用任何策略,但考官观察到一些策略的持续使用,如 "从左到右、从上到下编码",f = 92%;"扫描页面寻找下一个数字或字母",f = 100%。韦尔奇 t 检验未显示参与者的成绩与主考官观察到的策略之间存在关系(平均差异 | = 0.05-0.81, ps ≥ 0.05),也未显示参与者报告的策略与主考官观察到的策略之间存在关系(平均差异 | = 0.05-1.69, ps ≥ 0.05)。这些结果表明,虽然考官可以观察到策略的使用,但考生并不知道他们使用了哪些策略,而且所使用的策略与他们的成绩无关。未来的研究需要证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategies Used by Puerto Rican Children in the Cognitive Assessment System and Their Relationship with Planning Performance.

Studies involving the Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) planning scale typically use only the subtest and scale scores without assessing the strategies employed by the participants. This study addressed this gap and examined the planning strategies used by children in the CAS2: Spanish version and their relationship with planning performance. We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional study with 26 Puerto Rican children aged 8 to 11. Results showed that no strategies were consistently used by participants according to examinees' reports (f = 0-46%), but examiners observed consistent use of some strategies such as "coded left to right, top to bottom", f = 92%; "scanned the page for the next number or letter", f = 100%. Welch's t-tests did not show relationships between participants' performance and the strategies observed by examiners, | mean differences | = 0.05-0.81, ps ≥ 0.05, nor with the strategies reported by participants, | mean differences | = 0.05-1.69, ps ≥ 0.05. These findings suggest that although the examiners may observe the use of strategies, the examinees are unaware of the strategies they use, and the strategies used are not associated with their performance. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intelligence
Journal of Intelligence Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
17.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信