Sylvia H Li, Katharine Foster Nehme, Anna Moshkovich, Lydia Suh, Anna Pawlowski, Yasmeen Ali, Gayatri B Patel, Fei Li Kuang, Anju T Peters
{"title":"嗜酸性粒细胞增多症与杜匹单抗对呼吸系统的不良反应:真实世界环境","authors":"Sylvia H Li, Katharine Foster Nehme, Anna Moshkovich, Lydia Suh, Anna Pawlowski, Yasmeen Ali, Gayatri B Patel, Fei Li Kuang, Anju T Peters","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2024.09.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dupilumab has been used with significant benefit in the treatment of asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Phase 3 clinical trials have demonstrated transient eosinophilia and rare eosinophil-related and other adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize dupilumab-associated eosinophilia (absolute eosinophil count ≥1.5 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL within 36 weeks of dupilumab initiation) and adverse effects associated in real-world patients with asthma and CRSwNP in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review of 251 patients receiving dupilumab for asthma and/or CRSwNP seen at a single institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 142 patients who had absolute eosinophil counts checked before and after treatment, 16 (11.3%) had posttreatment eosinophilia, including 11 (7.7%) who had new eosinophilia on dupilumab initiation. Thirteen patients with posttreatment eosinophilia remained on dupilumab, 10 of whom had resolution of eosinophilia. Eosinophil-related adverse effects were rare, and cases of eosinophilic granulomatous polyangiitis were limited to one patient with eosinophilia and one patient with normal eosinophil levels who was receiving systemic corticosteroids. Other adverse effects included arthralgias (13 of 251; 5.2%), rash (8 of 251; 3.2%), and conjunctivitis (7 of 251; 2.8%). All patients with pretreatment eosinophilia and most patients with posttreatment eosinophilia received significant treatment benefit for the respiratory disease with dupilumab.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Whereas dupilumab-associated eosinophilia is seen in a subset of patients, persistent eosinophilia or eosinophil-related adverse effects are rare. Furthermore, treatment benefit with dupilumab despite eosinophilia supports its continued use in both asthma and CRSwNP.</p>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":" ","pages":"121-131"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eosinophilia and Adverse Effects of Dupilumab for Respiratory Indications: A Real-World Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Sylvia H Li, Katharine Foster Nehme, Anna Moshkovich, Lydia Suh, Anna Pawlowski, Yasmeen Ali, Gayatri B Patel, Fei Li Kuang, Anju T Peters\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaip.2024.09.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dupilumab has been used with significant benefit in the treatment of asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Phase 3 clinical trials have demonstrated transient eosinophilia and rare eosinophil-related and other adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize dupilumab-associated eosinophilia (absolute eosinophil count ≥1.5 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL within 36 weeks of dupilumab initiation) and adverse effects associated in real-world patients with asthma and CRSwNP in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review of 251 patients receiving dupilumab for asthma and/or CRSwNP seen at a single institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 142 patients who had absolute eosinophil counts checked before and after treatment, 16 (11.3%) had posttreatment eosinophilia, including 11 (7.7%) who had new eosinophilia on dupilumab initiation. Thirteen patients with posttreatment eosinophilia remained on dupilumab, 10 of whom had resolution of eosinophilia. Eosinophil-related adverse effects were rare, and cases of eosinophilic granulomatous polyangiitis were limited to one patient with eosinophilia and one patient with normal eosinophil levels who was receiving systemic corticosteroids. Other adverse effects included arthralgias (13 of 251; 5.2%), rash (8 of 251; 3.2%), and conjunctivitis (7 of 251; 2.8%). All patients with pretreatment eosinophilia and most patients with posttreatment eosinophilia received significant treatment benefit for the respiratory disease with dupilumab.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Whereas dupilumab-associated eosinophilia is seen in a subset of patients, persistent eosinophilia or eosinophil-related adverse effects are rare. Furthermore, treatment benefit with dupilumab despite eosinophilia supports its continued use in both asthma and CRSwNP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"121-131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717595/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2024.09.013\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2024.09.013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Eosinophilia and Adverse Effects of Dupilumab for Respiratory Indications: A Real-World Setting.
Background: Dupilumab has been used with significant benefit in the treatment of asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Phase 3 clinical trials have demonstrated transient eosinophilia and rare eosinophil-related and other adverse effects.
Objective: To characterize dupilumab-associated eosinophilia (absolute eosinophil count ≥1.5 × 103/μL within 36 weeks of dupilumab initiation) and adverse effects associated in real-world patients with asthma and CRSwNP in the United States.
Methods: Retrospective chart review of 251 patients receiving dupilumab for asthma and/or CRSwNP seen at a single institution.
Results: Among the 142 patients who had absolute eosinophil counts checked before and after treatment, 16 (11.3%) had posttreatment eosinophilia, including 11 (7.7%) who had new eosinophilia on dupilumab initiation. Thirteen patients with posttreatment eosinophilia remained on dupilumab, 10 of whom had resolution of eosinophilia. Eosinophil-related adverse effects were rare, and cases of eosinophilic granulomatous polyangiitis were limited to one patient with eosinophilia and one patient with normal eosinophil levels who was receiving systemic corticosteroids. Other adverse effects included arthralgias (13 of 251; 5.2%), rash (8 of 251; 3.2%), and conjunctivitis (7 of 251; 2.8%). All patients with pretreatment eosinophilia and most patients with posttreatment eosinophilia received significant treatment benefit for the respiratory disease with dupilumab.
Conclusions: Whereas dupilumab-associated eosinophilia is seen in a subset of patients, persistent eosinophilia or eosinophil-related adverse effects are rare. Furthermore, treatment benefit with dupilumab despite eosinophilia supports its continued use in both asthma and CRSwNP.
期刊介绍:
JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases.
This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders.
The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.