炎症性肠病患者使用辅助和替代疗法的情况。

3区 综合性期刊
Laura Frank, Kelly Lambert
{"title":"炎症性肠病患者使用辅助和替代疗法的情况。","authors":"Laura Frank, Kelly Lambert","doi":"10.3390/ijerph21091140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) are frequently discussed by people with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). The aim of this study is to explore CAM use in Australians with IBD. This cross-sectional study was conducted via an anonymous online survey, predominantly distributed through IBD-specific social media accounts. Data collection occurred over a three-month period in 2021. Descriptive statistics, Chi-Square tests, and binary logistic regression were used to analyse quantitative data. A simple thematic analysis was conducted for qualitative free-text responses. Of the 123 responses, acupuncture (12.2%) and chiropractors (8.9%) were common CAM practitioners accessed. CAM practitioners were perceived to be 'very helpful' compared to mainstream health practitioners. The most common CAM products reported were vitamins (51.2%), probiotics (43.9%), and herbal medicine (30.9%). Common reasons for use were improved perceived improvements to wellbeing or for long-term management of IBD. Females were more likely to access CAM practitioners (OR 12.6, 95% CI 1.62-98.1, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Doctors were the participants' primary source of information (64.2%), although many expressed dissatisfaction with conventional therapy and the desire for a more holistic approach to care. The use of CAMs in this sample was high. Limited research into the efficacy and safety of these therapies may prevent health professionals from discussing their use with patients. Improved communication with health professionals will allow patients to be active partners in their healthcare plans and can heighten patient satisfaction with conventional therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11431664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Complementary and Alternative Therapies in People with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Frank, Kelly Lambert\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ijerph21091140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) are frequently discussed by people with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). The aim of this study is to explore CAM use in Australians with IBD. This cross-sectional study was conducted via an anonymous online survey, predominantly distributed through IBD-specific social media accounts. Data collection occurred over a three-month period in 2021. Descriptive statistics, Chi-Square tests, and binary logistic regression were used to analyse quantitative data. A simple thematic analysis was conducted for qualitative free-text responses. Of the 123 responses, acupuncture (12.2%) and chiropractors (8.9%) were common CAM practitioners accessed. CAM practitioners were perceived to be 'very helpful' compared to mainstream health practitioners. The most common CAM products reported were vitamins (51.2%), probiotics (43.9%), and herbal medicine (30.9%). Common reasons for use were improved perceived improvements to wellbeing or for long-term management of IBD. Females were more likely to access CAM practitioners (OR 12.6, 95% CI 1.62-98.1, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Doctors were the participants' primary source of information (64.2%), although many expressed dissatisfaction with conventional therapy and the desire for a more holistic approach to care. The use of CAMs in this sample was high. Limited research into the efficacy and safety of these therapies may prevent health professionals from discussing their use with patients. Improved communication with health professionals will allow patients to be active partners in their healthcare plans and can heighten patient satisfaction with conventional therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11431664/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21091140\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21091140","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

炎症性肠病 (IBD) 患者经常讨论补充和替代药物 (CAM)。本研究旨在探讨澳大利亚 IBD 患者使用 CAM 的情况。这项横断面研究是通过匿名在线调查进行的,调查主要通过 IBD 专用社交媒体账户发布。数据收集时间为 2021 年的三个月。描述性统计、奇偶检验和二元逻辑回归被用于分析定量数据。对定性的自由文本回复进行了简单的主题分析。在 123 个回复中,针灸(12.2%)和脊骨神经科医生(8.9%)是常见的 CAM 医生。与主流医疗从业人员相比,人们认为 CAM 从业人员 "非常有帮助"。最常见的 CAM 产品是维生素(51.2%)、益生菌(43.9%)和草药(30.9%)。使用这些产品的常见原因是为了改善健康状况或长期治疗 IBD。女性更有可能接触 CAM 医生(OR 12.6,95% CI 1.62-98.1,p = 0.02)。医生是参与者的主要信息来源(64.2%),尽管许多人对传统疗法表示不满,并希望获得更全面的护理方法。该样本中使用 CAMs 的比例很高。对这些疗法的疗效和安全性的研究有限,这可能会妨碍医疗专业人员与患者讨论使用这些疗法的问题。加强与医疗专业人员的沟通将使患者成为其医疗保健计划的积极合作伙伴,并能提高患者对传统疗法的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of Complementary and Alternative Therapies in People with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) are frequently discussed by people with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). The aim of this study is to explore CAM use in Australians with IBD. This cross-sectional study was conducted via an anonymous online survey, predominantly distributed through IBD-specific social media accounts. Data collection occurred over a three-month period in 2021. Descriptive statistics, Chi-Square tests, and binary logistic regression were used to analyse quantitative data. A simple thematic analysis was conducted for qualitative free-text responses. Of the 123 responses, acupuncture (12.2%) and chiropractors (8.9%) were common CAM practitioners accessed. CAM practitioners were perceived to be 'very helpful' compared to mainstream health practitioners. The most common CAM products reported were vitamins (51.2%), probiotics (43.9%), and herbal medicine (30.9%). Common reasons for use were improved perceived improvements to wellbeing or for long-term management of IBD. Females were more likely to access CAM practitioners (OR 12.6, 95% CI 1.62-98.1, p = 0.02). Doctors were the participants' primary source of information (64.2%), although many expressed dissatisfaction with conventional therapy and the desire for a more holistic approach to care. The use of CAMs in this sample was high. Limited research into the efficacy and safety of these therapies may prevent health professionals from discussing their use with patients. Improved communication with health professionals will allow patients to be active partners in their healthcare plans and can heighten patient satisfaction with conventional therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14422
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health. The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信