修改游戏中解决问题的评估以提高其实用性:对有效性、响应性和可靠性的评估。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Rebecca M Molinini, Natalie A Koziol, Ketaki Inamdar, Claire Rhee, Arya Salgaonkar, Regina T Harbourne, Lin-Ya Hsu, Sarah Westcott Mccoy, Michele A Lobo, James Bovaird, Jennifer Burnsed, Christine Spence, Richard Stevenson, Stacey C Dusing
{"title":"修改游戏中解决问题的评估以提高其实用性:对有效性、响应性和可靠性的评估。","authors":"Rebecca M Molinini, Natalie A Koziol, Ketaki Inamdar, Claire Rhee, Arya Salgaonkar, Regina T Harbourne, Lin-Ya Hsu, Sarah Westcott Mccoy, Michele A Lobo, James Bovaird, Jennifer Burnsed, Christine Spence, Richard Stevenson, Stacey C Dusing","doi":"10.1097/PEP.0000000000001123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the psychometric properties of a 4-second interval scoring modification of the Assessment of Problem-Solving in Play (ie, Assessment of Problem-Solving in Play 4-second interval scoring [APSP-4]).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 95 children (3-48 months) with or at high risk for neuromotor delay were assessed with the APSP-4 and Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-III (Bayley). APSP-4 and Bayley cognitive raw scores were compared by age (construct validity) and over time (responsiveness). Twenty percent of videos were scored twice for intra- and interrater reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The APSP-4 demonstrated excellent interrater (intraclass correlations [ICCs] ≥ 0.96) and intrarater (ICCs ≥ 0.99) reliability and performed similar to Bayley cognitive raw scores at different ages ( r s > 0.5), and over time ( r  = 0.81). The motor delay had similar effects on APSP-4 and Bayley scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results support the validity and reliability evidence of the APSP-4 for use over time in tracking problem-solving skills in young children aged 3 to 48 months. Future research investigating clinical implementation of the APSP-4 is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49006,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"449-456"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11446646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Modification to the Assessment of Problem-Solving in Play to Enhance Its Utility: Evaluation of Validity, Responsiveness, and Reliability.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca M Molinini, Natalie A Koziol, Ketaki Inamdar, Claire Rhee, Arya Salgaonkar, Regina T Harbourne, Lin-Ya Hsu, Sarah Westcott Mccoy, Michele A Lobo, James Bovaird, Jennifer Burnsed, Christine Spence, Richard Stevenson, Stacey C Dusing\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PEP.0000000000001123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the psychometric properties of a 4-second interval scoring modification of the Assessment of Problem-Solving in Play (ie, Assessment of Problem-Solving in Play 4-second interval scoring [APSP-4]).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 95 children (3-48 months) with or at high risk for neuromotor delay were assessed with the APSP-4 and Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-III (Bayley). APSP-4 and Bayley cognitive raw scores were compared by age (construct validity) and over time (responsiveness). Twenty percent of videos were scored twice for intra- and interrater reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The APSP-4 demonstrated excellent interrater (intraclass correlations [ICCs] ≥ 0.96) and intrarater (ICCs ≥ 0.99) reliability and performed similar to Bayley cognitive raw scores at different ages ( r s > 0.5), and over time ( r  = 0.81). The motor delay had similar effects on APSP-4 and Bayley scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results support the validity and reliability evidence of the APSP-4 for use over time in tracking problem-solving skills in young children aged 3 to 48 months. Future research investigating clinical implementation of the APSP-4 is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"449-456\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11446646/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000001123\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000001123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究调查了游戏中解决问题能力评估(即游戏中解决问题能力评估4秒间隔计分法[APSP-4])的心理测量学特性:共对 95 名神经运动发育迟缓或高风险儿童(3-48 个月)进行了 APSP-4 和贝雷婴幼儿发展量表-III(Bayley)评估。APSP-4 和 Bayley 认知原始分数按年龄(结构有效性)和时间(响应性)进行比较。对 20% 的视频进行了两次评分,以确保评分者内部和评分者之间的可靠性:APSP-4显示了极佳的研究者间(类内相关性[ICCs] ≥ 0.96)和研究者内(ICCs ≥ 0.99)可靠性,在不同年龄段(rs > 0.5)和不同时间段(r = 0.81)与Bayley认知原始分数的表现相似。运动延迟对 APSP-4 和 Bayley 分数的影响相似:研究结果支持 APSP-4 的有效性和可靠性,可用于长期跟踪 3 至 48 个月幼儿解决问题的技能。未来还需要对 APSP-4 的临床应用进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Modification to the Assessment of Problem-Solving in Play to Enhance Its Utility: Evaluation of Validity, Responsiveness, and Reliability.

Purpose: This study investigated the psychometric properties of a 4-second interval scoring modification of the Assessment of Problem-Solving in Play (ie, Assessment of Problem-Solving in Play 4-second interval scoring [APSP-4]).

Methods: A total of 95 children (3-48 months) with or at high risk for neuromotor delay were assessed with the APSP-4 and Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-III (Bayley). APSP-4 and Bayley cognitive raw scores were compared by age (construct validity) and over time (responsiveness). Twenty percent of videos were scored twice for intra- and interrater reliability.

Results: The APSP-4 demonstrated excellent interrater (intraclass correlations [ICCs] ≥ 0.96) and intrarater (ICCs ≥ 0.99) reliability and performed similar to Bayley cognitive raw scores at different ages ( r s > 0.5), and over time ( r  = 0.81). The motor delay had similar effects on APSP-4 and Bayley scores.

Conclusions: Results support the validity and reliability evidence of the APSP-4 for use over time in tracking problem-solving skills in young children aged 3 to 48 months. Future research investigating clinical implementation of the APSP-4 is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Physical Therapy
Pediatric Physical Therapy PEDIATRICS-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
18.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Physical Therapy is an indexed international journal, that publishes peer reviewed research related to the practice of physical therapy for children with movement disorders. The editorial board is comprised of an international panel of researchers and clinical scholars that oversees a rigorous peer review process. The journal serves as the official journal for the pediatric physical therapy professional organizations in the Netherlands, Switzerland, New Zealand, Canada, and the United States. The journal includes articles that support evidenced based practice of physical therapy for children with neuromuscular, musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory and developmental conditions that lead to disorders of movement, and research reports that contribute to the foundational sciences of pediatric physical therapy, ranging from biomechanics and pediatric exercise science to neurodevelopmental science. To these ends the journal publishes original research articles, systematic reviews directed to specific clinical questions that further the science of physical therapy, clinical guidelines and case reports that describe unusual conditions or cutting edge interventions with sound rationale. The journal adheres to the ethical standards of theInternational Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信