评估在从产房到产房的新系统中引入 PRRSV 后生长后期猪抗生素使用的变化情况

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Isadora Machado , Thomas Petznick , Ana Paula S. Poeta Silva , Chong Wang , Locke Karriker , Daniel C.L. Linhares , Gustavo S. Silva
{"title":"评估在从产房到产房的新系统中引入 PRRSV 后生长后期猪抗生素使用的变化情况","authors":"Isadora Machado ,&nbsp;Thomas Petznick ,&nbsp;Ana Paula S. Poeta Silva ,&nbsp;Chong Wang ,&nbsp;Locke Karriker ,&nbsp;Daniel C.L. Linhares ,&nbsp;Gustavo S. Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Responsible antibiotic usage (ABU) is crucial for both animal and human health and requires constant improvement of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). The presence of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), a viral pathogen with immunosuppressive effects on swine, can intensify bacterial co-infections, alter antibiotic pharmacokinetics, and potentially lead to increased ABU. This study aimed to measure ABU changes in the grow-finish population associated with PRRSV infection and describe the antibiotic classes employed to manage clinical signs from a farrow-to-finish genetic multiplier system. Three PRRSV statuses (naïve, positive epidemic, and positive endemic) were established to classify the lots based on PRRSV circulation, with a total of 135,063 animals evaluated. The number of pig treatments per animal days at risk (PTDR) was calculated by administration route to quantify ABU across PRRSV status using negative binomial regression and non-parametric tests (<em>P-value</em> &lt; 0.05). Moreover, to improve ABU comparability in the international scenario, the milligrams per population correction unit (mg/PCU) was calculated according to the European Medicines Agency guidelines. In the nursery phase, there was a statistically significant difference between PRRSV statuses for the overall PTDR (injectable and water routes of administration), with an ABU increase of 3.79 and 2.51 times the naïve PTDR for positive epidemic and endemic status, respectively. For the finishing phase, there was a statistically significant difference between PRRSV statuses in the injectable PTDR, with an ABU increase of 2.74 and 2.28 times the naïve PTDR level for positive epidemic and endemic statuses, respectively. In the nursery phase, the mean mg/PCU was 22.27 mg/PCU for naïve, 86.71 for positive epidemic, and 33.37 for positive endemic statuses; in the finishing phase, 81.31, 76.55, and 67.09 mg/PCU, respectively. The most frequently injected antibiotic in the nursery phase was ampicillin, with 49 % of total injections, followed by lincomycin (31 %) and enrofloxacin (20 %), and in the finishing phase, 72 % of injections were lincomycin, followed by enrofloxacin (28 %). The results highlight that the PRRSV outbreak in the source was associated with a grow-finish ABU increase, revealing the importance of preventing PRRSV infection to potentially decrease ABU and improve AMS within swine production systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20413,"journal":{"name":"Preventive veterinary medicine","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 106350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of changes in antibiotic use in grow-finish pigs after the introduction of PRRSV in a naïve farrow-to-finish system\",\"authors\":\"Isadora Machado ,&nbsp;Thomas Petznick ,&nbsp;Ana Paula S. Poeta Silva ,&nbsp;Chong Wang ,&nbsp;Locke Karriker ,&nbsp;Daniel C.L. Linhares ,&nbsp;Gustavo S. Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Responsible antibiotic usage (ABU) is crucial for both animal and human health and requires constant improvement of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). The presence of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), a viral pathogen with immunosuppressive effects on swine, can intensify bacterial co-infections, alter antibiotic pharmacokinetics, and potentially lead to increased ABU. This study aimed to measure ABU changes in the grow-finish population associated with PRRSV infection and describe the antibiotic classes employed to manage clinical signs from a farrow-to-finish genetic multiplier system. Three PRRSV statuses (naïve, positive epidemic, and positive endemic) were established to classify the lots based on PRRSV circulation, with a total of 135,063 animals evaluated. The number of pig treatments per animal days at risk (PTDR) was calculated by administration route to quantify ABU across PRRSV status using negative binomial regression and non-parametric tests (<em>P-value</em> &lt; 0.05). Moreover, to improve ABU comparability in the international scenario, the milligrams per population correction unit (mg/PCU) was calculated according to the European Medicines Agency guidelines. In the nursery phase, there was a statistically significant difference between PRRSV statuses for the overall PTDR (injectable and water routes of administration), with an ABU increase of 3.79 and 2.51 times the naïve PTDR for positive epidemic and endemic status, respectively. For the finishing phase, there was a statistically significant difference between PRRSV statuses in the injectable PTDR, with an ABU increase of 2.74 and 2.28 times the naïve PTDR level for positive epidemic and endemic statuses, respectively. In the nursery phase, the mean mg/PCU was 22.27 mg/PCU for naïve, 86.71 for positive epidemic, and 33.37 for positive endemic statuses; in the finishing phase, 81.31, 76.55, and 67.09 mg/PCU, respectively. The most frequently injected antibiotic in the nursery phase was ampicillin, with 49 % of total injections, followed by lincomycin (31 %) and enrofloxacin (20 %), and in the finishing phase, 72 % of injections were lincomycin, followed by enrofloxacin (28 %). The results highlight that the PRRSV outbreak in the source was associated with a grow-finish ABU increase, revealing the importance of preventing PRRSV infection to potentially decrease ABU and improve AMS within swine production systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventive veterinary medicine\",\"volume\":\"233 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106350\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventive veterinary medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587724002368\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive veterinary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587724002368","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

负责任地使用抗生素(ABU)对动物和人类健康都至关重要,需要不断改进抗菌药物管理(AMS)。猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒(PRRSV)是一种对猪有免疫抑制作用的病毒性病原体,它的存在会加剧细菌合并感染,改变抗生素的药代动力学,并可能导致抗生素使用量增加。本研究旨在测量与 PRRSV 感染相关的生长-出栏猪群的 ABU 变化,并描述为控制从产仔到出栏的遗传倍增系统的临床症状而采用的抗生素种类。根据 PRRSV 循环情况,确定了三种 PRRSV 状态(天真、阳性流行和阳性流行)来对批次进行分类,共评估了 135,063 头动物。通过负二项回归和非参数检验(P 值为 0.05),按给药途径计算出每只动物的风险日数(PTDR),以量化不同 PRRSV 状态下的 ABU。此外,为提高 ABU 在国际情况下的可比性,根据欧洲药品管理局指南计算了每人口校正单位毫克数(mg/PCU)。在育雏阶段,不同 PRRSV 状态下的总体 PTDR(注射和饮水给药途径)存在显著的统计学差异,阳性流行状态和地方病状态的 ABU 分别增加到天真 PTDR 的 3.79 倍和 2.51 倍。在育成期,不同 PRRSV 状态下的注射给药 PTDR 有显著的统计学差异,疫情阳性和流行状态下的 ABU 分别增加了 2.74 倍和 2.28 倍。在保育阶段,天真状态的平均 mg/PCU 为 22.27 mg/PCU,阳性流行状态为 86.71 mg/PCU,阳性地方病状态为 33.37 mg/PCU;在结束阶段,平均 mg/PCU 分别为 81.31、76.55 和 67.09 mg/PCU。在育雏阶段,最常注射的抗生素是氨苄西林,占总注射量的 49%,其次是林可霉素(31%)和恩诺沙星(20%);在育成阶段,72%的注射量是林可霉素,其次是恩诺沙星(28%)。结果表明,猪源中的 PRRSV 爆发与生长-育成阶段 ABU 的增加有关,揭示了预防 PRRSV 感染的重要性,从而有可能降低 ABU 并改善猪生产系统中的急性呼吸系统综合症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of changes in antibiotic use in grow-finish pigs after the introduction of PRRSV in a naïve farrow-to-finish system
Responsible antibiotic usage (ABU) is crucial for both animal and human health and requires constant improvement of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). The presence of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), a viral pathogen with immunosuppressive effects on swine, can intensify bacterial co-infections, alter antibiotic pharmacokinetics, and potentially lead to increased ABU. This study aimed to measure ABU changes in the grow-finish population associated with PRRSV infection and describe the antibiotic classes employed to manage clinical signs from a farrow-to-finish genetic multiplier system. Three PRRSV statuses (naïve, positive epidemic, and positive endemic) were established to classify the lots based on PRRSV circulation, with a total of 135,063 animals evaluated. The number of pig treatments per animal days at risk (PTDR) was calculated by administration route to quantify ABU across PRRSV status using negative binomial regression and non-parametric tests (P-value < 0.05). Moreover, to improve ABU comparability in the international scenario, the milligrams per population correction unit (mg/PCU) was calculated according to the European Medicines Agency guidelines. In the nursery phase, there was a statistically significant difference between PRRSV statuses for the overall PTDR (injectable and water routes of administration), with an ABU increase of 3.79 and 2.51 times the naïve PTDR for positive epidemic and endemic status, respectively. For the finishing phase, there was a statistically significant difference between PRRSV statuses in the injectable PTDR, with an ABU increase of 2.74 and 2.28 times the naïve PTDR level for positive epidemic and endemic statuses, respectively. In the nursery phase, the mean mg/PCU was 22.27 mg/PCU for naïve, 86.71 for positive epidemic, and 33.37 for positive endemic statuses; in the finishing phase, 81.31, 76.55, and 67.09 mg/PCU, respectively. The most frequently injected antibiotic in the nursery phase was ampicillin, with 49 % of total injections, followed by lincomycin (31 %) and enrofloxacin (20 %), and in the finishing phase, 72 % of injections were lincomycin, followed by enrofloxacin (28 %). The results highlight that the PRRSV outbreak in the source was associated with a grow-finish ABU increase, revealing the importance of preventing PRRSV infection to potentially decrease ABU and improve AMS within swine production systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Preventive veterinary medicine
Preventive veterinary medicine 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Preventive Veterinary Medicine is one of the leading international resources for scientific reports on animal health programs and preventive veterinary medicine. The journal follows the guidelines for standardizing and strengthening the reporting of biomedical research which are available from the CONSORT, MOOSE, PRISMA, REFLECT, STARD, and STROBE statements. The journal focuses on: Epidemiology of health events relevant to domestic and wild animals; Economic impacts of epidemic and endemic animal and zoonotic diseases; Latest methods and approaches in veterinary epidemiology; Disease and infection control or eradication measures; The "One Health" concept and the relationships between veterinary medicine, human health, animal-production systems, and the environment; Development of new techniques in surveillance systems and diagnosis; Evaluation and control of diseases in animal populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信