校本咨询和辅导促进教师的综合成果:荟萃分析

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Zachary C. LaBrot, Tyler Smith, Emily Maxime, Abigail Lawson
{"title":"校本咨询和辅导促进教师的综合成果:荟萃分析","authors":"Zachary C. LaBrot,&nbsp;Tyler Smith,&nbsp;Emily Maxime,&nbsp;Abigail Lawson","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>School-based consultation or coaching may be used to promote teachers' use of various classroom management practices and interventions. An important aspect of school-based consultation and coaching is ensuring teachers generalize their use of evidence-based practices that were trained through consultation. However, the extent to which teachers generalize practices trained through consultation or coaching is somewhat unclear. As such, the purpose of this meta-analysis was twofold: (a) synthesize the existing school-based consultation literature to determine the extent to which teachers generalize practices they learned through consultation and coaching and (b) make a call to action for researchers to collect generalization data in consultation and coaching research. Seventeen studies were identified for review, in which results indicated school-based consultation and coaching to be effective for promoting teachers' generalization of EBPs (LRRi = 0.82) as well as target outcomes (LRRi = 1.15). Specific implementation supports (i.e., in situ training and behavioral skills training) significantly contributed to teachers' generalization, with specific practices (i.e., behavior specific praise) being more generalizable. Furthermore, moderation analyses were conducted to delineate aspects of consultation and coaching that are more likely to promote teachers' generalized outcomes. Limitations, future directions, and implications for research and practice are described.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"School-based consultation and coaching for promoting teachers’ generalized outcomes: A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Zachary C. LaBrot,&nbsp;Tyler Smith,&nbsp;Emily Maxime,&nbsp;Abigail Lawson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>School-based consultation or coaching may be used to promote teachers' use of various classroom management practices and interventions. An important aspect of school-based consultation and coaching is ensuring teachers generalize their use of evidence-based practices that were trained through consultation. However, the extent to which teachers generalize practices trained through consultation or coaching is somewhat unclear. As such, the purpose of this meta-analysis was twofold: (a) synthesize the existing school-based consultation literature to determine the extent to which teachers generalize practices they learned through consultation and coaching and (b) make a call to action for researchers to collect generalization data in consultation and coaching research. Seventeen studies were identified for review, in which results indicated school-based consultation and coaching to be effective for promoting teachers' generalization of EBPs (LRRi = 0.82) as well as target outcomes (LRRi = 1.15). Specific implementation supports (i.e., in situ training and behavioral skills training) significantly contributed to teachers' generalization, with specific practices (i.e., behavior specific praise) being more generalizable. Furthermore, moderation analyses were conducted to delineate aspects of consultation and coaching that are more likely to promote teachers' generalized outcomes. Limitations, future directions, and implications for research and practice are described.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of School Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of School Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440524000992\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440524000992","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

校本咨询或辅导可用于促进教师使用各种课堂管理实践和干预措施。校本咨询和辅导的一个重要方面是确保教师推广使用通过咨询培训的循证实践。然而,教师在多大程度上推广了通过咨询或辅导培训的实践方法,目前尚不清楚。因此,本荟萃分析有两个目的:(a)综合现有的校本咨询文献,以确定教师在多大程度上推广了他们通过咨询和辅导所学到的方法;(b)呼吁研究人员在咨询和辅导研究中收集推广数据。研究结果表明,校本咨询与辅导能有效促进教师推广 EBPs(LRRi = 0.82)和目标成果(LRRi = 1.15)。具体的实施支持(即现场培训和行为技能培训)对教师的推广有显著的促进作用,而具体的做法(即针对具体行为的表扬)则更具推广性。此外,我们还进行了调节分析,以确定咨询和辅导的哪些方面更有可能促进教师的普遍化成果。本文阐述了研究的局限性、未来发展方向以及对研究和实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
School-based consultation and coaching for promoting teachers’ generalized outcomes: A meta-analysis
School-based consultation or coaching may be used to promote teachers' use of various classroom management practices and interventions. An important aspect of school-based consultation and coaching is ensuring teachers generalize their use of evidence-based practices that were trained through consultation. However, the extent to which teachers generalize practices trained through consultation or coaching is somewhat unclear. As such, the purpose of this meta-analysis was twofold: (a) synthesize the existing school-based consultation literature to determine the extent to which teachers generalize practices they learned through consultation and coaching and (b) make a call to action for researchers to collect generalization data in consultation and coaching research. Seventeen studies were identified for review, in which results indicated school-based consultation and coaching to be effective for promoting teachers' generalization of EBPs (LRRi = 0.82) as well as target outcomes (LRRi = 1.15). Specific implementation supports (i.e., in situ training and behavioral skills training) significantly contributed to teachers' generalization, with specific practices (i.e., behavior specific praise) being more generalizable. Furthermore, moderation analyses were conducted to delineate aspects of consultation and coaching that are more likely to promote teachers' generalized outcomes. Limitations, future directions, and implications for research and practice are described.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of School Psychology
Journal of School Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信