留下还是离开?金融脱钩推动下的美国上市中国公司与全球金融网络的重塑

IF 4.7 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
{"title":"留下还是离开?金融脱钩推动下的美国上市中国公司与全球金融网络的重塑","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The deterioration of Sino-US relations in recent years has led to a financial decoupling between the world's two largest economies, impacting Chinese companies listed on US stock markets. This study explores the consequential decisions of these companies to either remain listed or leave the US markets and examines their impacts on the reshaping of Global Financial Networks (GFNs). By utilizing an analytical framework encompassing listings, delistings, and cross-listings, we identify distinct channels through which Sino-US geopolitical tensions shape GFNs. Our findings reveal a notable shift towards a regionalized spatial pattern within GFNs following the return of Chinese companies to the Hong Kong and mainland China stock markets. During this transformative process, Chinese securities firms have emerged as significant players, challenging the dominance of Western bulge-bracket banks. Moreover, Hong Kong has become an increasingly central node in the GFNs shaped by Chinese companies' return listings. Nonetheless, New York sustains its pre-eminence as a leading financial centre, and the Cayman Islands retains its pivotal role as an offshore jurisdiction. These findings highlight the formative and restructuring power of world governments (WGs) within GFNs. Taken together, the contributions of this paper are twofold. First, it advances our understanding of the intricate relationship between geopolitics and GFNs, shedding light on the impacts of geopolitical tensions on global finance. Second, it argues that the GFN approach is a powerful framework for exploring how global financial activities are embedded in geopolitical dynamics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48262,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stay or leave? US-listed Chinese companies under financial decoupling push and the reshaping of global financial networks\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The deterioration of Sino-US relations in recent years has led to a financial decoupling between the world's two largest economies, impacting Chinese companies listed on US stock markets. This study explores the consequential decisions of these companies to either remain listed or leave the US markets and examines their impacts on the reshaping of Global Financial Networks (GFNs). By utilizing an analytical framework encompassing listings, delistings, and cross-listings, we identify distinct channels through which Sino-US geopolitical tensions shape GFNs. Our findings reveal a notable shift towards a regionalized spatial pattern within GFNs following the return of Chinese companies to the Hong Kong and mainland China stock markets. During this transformative process, Chinese securities firms have emerged as significant players, challenging the dominance of Western bulge-bracket banks. Moreover, Hong Kong has become an increasingly central node in the GFNs shaped by Chinese companies' return listings. Nonetheless, New York sustains its pre-eminence as a leading financial centre, and the Cayman Islands retains its pivotal role as an offshore jurisdiction. These findings highlight the formative and restructuring power of world governments (WGs) within GFNs. Taken together, the contributions of this paper are twofold. First, it advances our understanding of the intricate relationship between geopolitics and GFNs, shedding light on the impacts of geopolitical tensions on global finance. Second, it argues that the GFN approach is a powerful framework for exploring how global financial activities are embedded in geopolitical dynamics.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Geography\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629824001628\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629824001628","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,中美关系的恶化导致世界上最大的两个经济体之间的金融脱钩,影响了在美国股市上市的中国公司。本研究探讨了这些公司继续上市或退出美国市场的相应决定,并研究了它们对全球金融网络(GFN)重塑的影响。通过利用包括上市、退市和交叉上市在内的分析框架,我们确定了中美地缘政治紧张局势塑造全球金融网络的不同渠道。我们的研究结果表明,在中国公司回归香港和中国大陆股市后,全球金融市场网的空间格局发生了明显的区域化转变。在这一转变过程中,中国证券公司成为重要的参与者,挑战了西方大银行的主导地位。此外,在中国公司回归上市所形成的全球金融网络中,香港已成为一个日益重要的节点。尽管如此,纽约仍保持着其作为主要金融中心的突出地位,开曼群岛则继续保持着其作为离岸司法管辖区的关键作用。这些发现凸显了世界政府(WGs)在全球金融网络中的形成和重组力量。综上所述,本文有两方面的贡献。首先,它加深了我们对地缘政治与全球金融网络之间错综复杂关系的理解,揭示了地缘政治紧张局势对全球金融的影响。其次,本文论证了全球金融网络方法是探索全球金融活动如何嵌入地缘政治动态的有力框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stay or leave? US-listed Chinese companies under financial decoupling push and the reshaping of global financial networks
The deterioration of Sino-US relations in recent years has led to a financial decoupling between the world's two largest economies, impacting Chinese companies listed on US stock markets. This study explores the consequential decisions of these companies to either remain listed or leave the US markets and examines their impacts on the reshaping of Global Financial Networks (GFNs). By utilizing an analytical framework encompassing listings, delistings, and cross-listings, we identify distinct channels through which Sino-US geopolitical tensions shape GFNs. Our findings reveal a notable shift towards a regionalized spatial pattern within GFNs following the return of Chinese companies to the Hong Kong and mainland China stock markets. During this transformative process, Chinese securities firms have emerged as significant players, challenging the dominance of Western bulge-bracket banks. Moreover, Hong Kong has become an increasingly central node in the GFNs shaped by Chinese companies' return listings. Nonetheless, New York sustains its pre-eminence as a leading financial centre, and the Cayman Islands retains its pivotal role as an offshore jurisdiction. These findings highlight the formative and restructuring power of world governments (WGs) within GFNs. Taken together, the contributions of this paper are twofold. First, it advances our understanding of the intricate relationship between geopolitics and GFNs, shedding light on the impacts of geopolitical tensions on global finance. Second, it argues that the GFN approach is a powerful framework for exploring how global financial activities are embedded in geopolitical dynamics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Political Geography is the flagship journal of political geography and research on the spatial dimensions of politics. The journal brings together leading contributions in its field, promoting international and interdisciplinary communication. Research emphases cover all scales of inquiry and diverse theories, methods, and methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信